Anthropic的国际事务负责人在都柏林接受彭博电视采访时表示，其模型的开放替代方案本质上风险更大。这一说法比达里奥·阿莫代伊7月份提出的更为宽泛，当时他指出，没有危险能力的开放权重模型是一种公共品。
Anthropic’s head of international told Bloomberg TV in Dublin that open alternatives to its models carry more risk by definition. That is a broader claim than the one Dario Amodei set out in July, when he wrote that open-weight models without dangerous capabilities are a public good.
Anthropic在美国以外地区的最高销售主管表示，与其自身模型竞争的开放模式风险更大。他在都柏林的爱尔兰政府峰会上发表了这一看法。
Anthropic’s top sales executive outside the US says the open models competing with its own carry more risk. He said it in Dublin, at an Irish government summit.
“我们在开源安全方面需要格外谨慎，”Anthropic国际事务负责人吉勒姆·普兰森周三对彭博电视表示。“我无法代表开放模型发言。但按定义，它们风险更大。”该场地并非中立之地。国际AI峰会是爱尔兰欧盟理事会轮值主席国的官方活动，由亨娜·维尔库宁主持开幕。爱尔兰公民自由委员会曾要求爱尔兰回避，因为其税收依赖于它所引导的文件所属的公司。
“We need to be really careful with open-source on safety,” Guillaume Princen, Anthropic’s head of international, told Bloomberg TV on Wednesday. “I can’t talk for open models. But by definition, there’s more risk with them.”The venue is not neutral ground. The International AI Summit is an official event of Ireland’s EU Council Presidency, opened by Henna Virkkunen. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties has asked Ireland to recuse itself, over its tax reliance on the firms whose files it steers.
Anthropic在此有立场需要维护。EMEA是其增长最快的地区，都柏林是其首个欧盟办事处，且其在纳斯达克的上市申请估值接近9650亿美元。
Anthropic has a position to protect there. EMEA is its fastest-growing region, Dublin its first EU office, and a Nasdaq listing filed at $965B is close.
竞争来自欧洲且较为近期。米斯特拉尔在八天前推出了名为“大型4”、昵称为“Le Chonk”的模型，这是一个万亿参数模型，在欧洲训练并主打主权概念。
The competition is European and recent. Mistral launched Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk, eight days earlier, a trillion-parameter model trained in Europe and pitched on sovereignty.
开放部分尚未落地。该模型的预览版通过米斯特拉尔的API提供，但权重要到10月27日才会发布，因此目前它仍是一个托管模型。
The open part has not landed. A preview runs through Mistral’s API and the weights are not due until 27 October, so today it is a hosted model.
普兰森的表态超过了其首席执行官。达里奥·阿莫代伊7月曾写道，Anthropic从未主张禁止开放权重模型，且那些没有危险能力的模型是一种公共品。
Princen went further than his chief executive. Dario Amodei wrote in July that Anthropic has never advocated banning open-weight models, and that those without dangerous capabilities are a public good.
分歧在于条件性与绝对性。阿莫代伊的论断取决于模型是否危险；而普兰森的论断则取决于模型的类别。
The gap is conditional against categorical. Amodei’s claim turns on whether a model is dangerous. Princen’s turns on the category.
有证据支持这种担忧。SaferAI发现，中国的GLM-5.2模型在进攻性网络或双用途生物学任务中没有拒绝任何一项；而Claude模型拒绝如此一致，以至于基准测试甚至无法完成。
There is evidence for the worry. SaferAI found China’s GLM-5.2 refused none of the offensive-cyber or dual-use-biology tasks. Claude refused so consistently the benchmark could not finish.
Anthropic 自身本周的研究也指向同一方向。其前沿红队让小型模型在廉价安卓电视盒子上实现了自我复制，且测试的每个模型均为开放模型，包括 Gemma 4 和 GLM-5.2。
Anthropic’s own research this week pointed the same way. Its Frontier Red Team got small models replicating across cheap Android TV boxes, and every model tested was open, including Gemma4 and GLM-5.2.
开放性在此切切实实是一把双刃剑，因为这些测试之所以可行，正是因为模型权重公开。Anthropic 的应对之道是实施准入控制，向经过审查的防御者提供模型发现的内容，而非模型本身。
Openness cut both ways there, since those tests were only possible because the weights were public. Anthropic’s answer is gated access, giving vetted defenders what the model finds rather than the model.
布鲁塞尔则倾向于另一条路径。《人工智能法案》第 53 条豁免真正免费且开源的模型履行部分向 AI 办公室提交文档的义务，除非认定存在系统性风险。
Brussels leans the other way. Article 53 of the AI Act exempts genuinely free and open-source models from part of the documentation owed to the AI Office, unless systemic risk is found.
Princen 还提出了一项价格主张。他表示，Claude Opus 5.5 比其前代产品便宜 40%。这是典型成本数据，因为挂牌价下降了 20%，其余降幅来自于使用的 token 更少。
Princen made a price claim too. He said Claude Opus 5.5 is 40% cheaper than its predecessor. That is the typical-cost figure, since the list price fell 20% and the rest comes from using fewer tokens.