10月14日 - 美国卫生部长罗伯特·F·肯尼迪 Jr. 在美国超过三十年来最严重的高传染性病毒爆发期间,改变了联邦政府对麻疹死亡的认定方式,引发疾病专家和政治对手的反对。以下是您需要了解的关于美国目前如何确定麻疹死亡的信息:有什么变化?
Oct 14 - US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has changed how the federal government recognizes deaths from measles in the midst of the worst US outbreak of the highly infectious virus in more than three decades, prompting backlash from disease experts and political opponents. Here is what you need to know about how US measles deaths are currently determined: WHAT HAS CHANGED?
一个多世纪以来,美国州和地方卫生官员被要求向联邦政府报告麻疹诊断患者的死亡病例。这些报告与医院工作人员或验尸官签发的死亡证明不同,后者可以将麻疹列为死亡原因或促成因素。
For over a century, US state and local health officials have been required to report cases of death in people with a measles diagnosis to the federal government. These reports are separate from death certificates issued by hospital staff or coroners that can list measles as a cause of death or as a contributing factor.
疾病专家普遍认为,任何感染麻疹的人的死亡都与病毒有关,因为麻疹可能直接损害器官或加重潜在健康问题。
Disease experts have generally considered the death of any person infected with measles to be related to the virus, which can directly impair organs or exacerbate underlying health problems.
肯尼迪表示,美国将不再自动将州政府向疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)报告的、死于麻疹的人员计入全国公布的麻疹死亡总数。
Kennedy has said the US will no longer automatically include state reports to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of people who died with measles in the national published tally of measles deaths.
相反,CDC的国家健康统计中心将首先确认该人的死亡证明上是否将麻疹列为死亡的根本原因 — — 根据卫生专家的说法,这一过程可能需要数周。CDC还表示,正在重新评估麻疹死亡的定义方式,但未解释进行此类审查的必要性。肯尼迪的改变为何引发争议?
Instead, the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics will first confirm that measles was identified as an underlying cause of death on a person's death certificate — a process that can take weeks, according to health experts. The CDC has also said it was re-evaluating how measles deaths are defined, without explaining the need for such a review. WHY IS KENNEDY'S CHANGE CONTROVERSIAL?
自2000年在美国境内消灭麻疹传播以来,美国目前正面临自1991年以来病毒的最大反弹,原因是疫苗犹豫情绪上升。自2025年初肯尼迪 — — 一位长期反疫苗活动家 — — 就任国家最高卫生职务以来,州和地方官员已报告超过6300例感染和至少8例死亡。
After eradicating measles transmission within the country in 2000, the United States is now battling its biggest resurgence of the virus since 1991, fueled by rising vaccine hesitancy. More than 6,300 infections and at least eight fatalities have been reported by state and local officials since Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, took the nation's top health job in early 2025.
肯尼迪多年来一直在质疑麻疹疫苗 — — 这是预防感染和疾病传播最有效的方式 — — 通过散布怀疑,他对麻疹是否可能致命表示怀疑,并推广一种理论,即病毒比用于对抗它的疫苗更不危险,这与数十年科学证据相悖,这些证据表明疫苗接种具有显著益处。
Kennedy, who spent years sowing doubt about the measles vaccine — by far the best way to prevent infection and spread of the disease — has cast doubt on whether measles can be fatal and promoted the theory that the virus is less dangerous than the vaccines used against it, contrary to decades of scientific evidence showing the benefits of the shots.
他在宾夕法尼亚州州长、民主党人乔什·夏皮罗面前公开争论,争论点在于该州报告的麻疹相关死亡病例,随后他改变了此类死亡的统计方式。截至目前,疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)仅接受了美国各州今年报告的五起麻疹相关死亡中的两起。
He sparred publicly with Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, over the state's report of measles-related deaths before changing how such fatalities are counted. The CDC has so far accepted only two out of five measles-related deaths reported by US states so far this year.
领先的医学组织表示,肯尼迪关于免疫的言论和政策增加了美国人对疫苗的不信任,尽管数十年的证据表明疫苗在预防疾病方面是安全有效的。疾病专家表示,卫生部长对麻疹死亡报告的质疑淡化了病毒的风险,而死亡统计方式的改变将延迟关键信息的发布,这些信息本来可以说服更多家庭为孩子接种疫苗。为什么有人死于麻疹时并不明显?
Leading medical organizations say Kennedy's comments and policies on immunization have increased Americans' distrust of vaccines, despite decades of evidence showing they are safe and effective at preventing disease. Disease experts say that the health secretary's questioning of measles death reports minimizes the risks of the virus, and that the change in how deaths are counted will delay information that could persuade more families to vaccinate their children. WHY ISN'T IT OBVIOUS WHEN SOMEONE DIED FROM MEASLES?
许多传染病是间接致命的。例如,麻疹可能引发诸如喉炎、肺炎和脑肿胀等并发症,这些并发症最终可能导致死亡。在某些情况下,致命的神经系统并发症要等到感染多年后才会出现。病毒还可能导致免疫系统抑制,使患者更容易受到致命的继发性细菌和病毒感染。
Many infectious diseases kill indirectly. Measles, for example, can trigger complications such as croup, pneumonia and brain swelling that ultimately prove fatal. In some cases, deadly neurological complications don't appear until years after the infection. The virus can also induce immune system suppression that makes patients vulnerable to fatal secondary bacterial and viral infections.
死亡证明通常会记录事件链。当患者因由麻疹引发的肺炎导致呼吸衰竭而死亡时,呼吸衰竭是直接死亡原因,而麻疹被视为根本原因,因为它引发了导致死亡的一系列事件。
Death certificates generally record a chain of events. When a patient dies of respiratory failure due to pneumonia that was due to measles, the respiratory failure is the immediate cause of death, and measles is considered an underlying cause because it initiated the sequence of events leading to death.
当地公共卫生官员通常会关注根本原因,因为它反映了引发致命过程的疾病。如果该人还有其他严重健康问题怎么办?
Local public health officials generally focus on the underlying cause because it reflects the disease responsible for setting the fatal process in motion. WHAT IF THE PERSON HAD OTHER SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEMS?
当患有慢性肺病、癌症或其他使其特别容易出现严重并发症的疾病的人在麻疹感染后死亡时,核心问题通常是:如果该人没有感染病毒,死亡是否仍可能发生。调查人员必须确定麻疹是导致恶化致死的原因,仅仅是促成因素,还是与死亡无关。
When a person with chronic lung disease, cancer, or another condition that makes them especially vulnerable to severe complications dies after a measles infection, the central question is usually whether the death would likely have occurred if the person had not contracted the virus. Investigators must determine whether measles caused the fatal deterioration, merely contributed to it, or was unrelated.
两位专家审阅同一份病历时,有时会强调案件的不同方面。这并不一定意味着任何一方行为不当。死亡原因的确定通常涉及医学判断。麻疹死亡和麻疹相关死亡有什么区别?
Two experts reviewing the same medical records may sometimes emphasize different aspects of the case. That does not necessarily mean either side is acting improperly. Cause-of-death determinations often involve medical judgment. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MEASLES DEATH AND A MEASLES-ASSOCIATED DEATH?
“麻疹相关死亡”这一术语可以反映出对病毒具体贡献程度的确定性不足。它使卫生官员能够在多种因素共同作用时承认存在关联。麻疹死亡是否被高估了?
The term "measles-associated death" can reflect uncertainty about precisely how much the virus contributed. It allows health officials to acknowledge a connection when multiple factors were involved. ARE MEASLES DEATHS BEING OVERCOUNTED?
目前没有证据表明麻疹死亡人数被系统性地高估。历史上,公共卫生监测一直关注疾病是否导致或显著促成死亡,而不是它是否是唯一因素。
There is no evidence that measles mortality is systematically overcounted. Historically, public health surveillance has focused on whether a disease caused or substantially contributed to death, rather than whether it was the sole factor involved.
在新冠肺炎疫情高峰期,曾就患有既往慢性疾病的患者是死于新冠(即SARS-CoV-2病毒导致死亡),还是伴有新冠(即他们恰好感染了新冠,但癌症或其他健康状况才是死亡原因)展开类似争论。
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, a similar debate took place over whether patients with preexisting chronic diseases were dying from COVID — that is, the SARS-CoV-2 virus caused the death — or with COVID, meaning they happened to have COVID but their cancer or other health condition is what killed them.
公共卫生专家认为,仅仅因为患者有其他医疗问题就排除其死亡病例会低估疾病的影响。
Public health experts argue that excluding deaths simply because a patient had other medical problems would underestimate the disease's impact.