
哥伦比亚大学毕业生马哈茂德·哈利勒于周一请求美国最高法院撤销一项裁决。该裁决为唐纳德·特朗普政府重新逮捕并驱逐这名巴勒斯坦活动人士扫清了法律障碍。在费城的美国第三巡回上诉法院裁定联邦移民法禁止下级法院法官下令将哈利勒从美国移民和海关执法局手中释放后,哈利勒的律师们请求最高法院受理此案。
Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil on Monday asked the US Supreme Court to overturn a ruling that opened the door for President Donald Trump's administration to re-arrest and deport the Palestinian activist. Khalil's lawyers asked the justices to take up his case after the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal immigration law barred a lower-court judge from ordering his release from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.
去年,特朗普政府大力打击大学校园内参与亲巴勒斯坦活动的非公民,哈利勒便是当时被逮捕的最知名的外国留学生之一。他的律师们指出,最高法院应当明确:移民法并不妨碍非公民通过法律途径主张自己遭拘留系因发表了受美国宪法第一修正案保护的言论所致。哈利勒周一对记者说道:“倘若特朗普政府可以因某人发表亲巴勒斯坦言论而予以惩罚,那么本届或今后的任何届政府都可以因任何言论来惩罚任何人。”
Khalil was among the most prominent foreign students to be arrested last year as the Trump administration pursued a campaign to detain and deport noncitizens who engaged in pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses. His lawyers say the Supreme Court should make clear that immigration law does not prevent noncitizens from pursuing cases arguing they have been detained to punish them for speech that is protected by the US Constitution's First Amendment." If the Trump administration can punish someone for their pro-Palestine speech, this or any future administration can punish anyone for any speech," Khalil told reporters on Monday.

在最高法院作出裁决前,哈利勒仍面临被重新逮捕及驱逐出境的风险。倘若第三巡回上诉法院的裁决得以维持,哈利勒便极有可能遭到逮捕与驱逐——此前美国移民上诉委员会已于4月份驳回了他针对移民法官“将其遣返回阿尔及利亚或叙利亚”这一命令提出的上诉。目前,一项禁止哈利勒被重新拘留的法院命令仍然有效,直至最高法院作出最终裁决。
Khalil faces possible re-arrest and deportation pending Supreme Court rulingIf the 3rd Circuit's decision is allowed to stand, Khalil faces the prospect of arrest and deportation, after the Board of Immigration Appeals in April rejected his challenge to an immigration judge's order that he be removed to Algeria or Syria.A lower court order barring him from being re-detained remains in place for now until the Supreme Court rules.
关于移民法官的裁决,另一项上诉程序仍待审理中。美国国土安全部(该部门负责监督移民与海关执法局,即ICE)的发言人表示,特朗普政府在处理卡利尔(Khalil)的案件时是在其职权范围内行事的,并建议他自行离开美国。卡利尔是支持巴勒斯坦、反对以色列在加沙发动战争的抗议活动中的重要人物;他是一名阿尔及利亚公民,出生于叙利亚的一个巴勒斯坦难民营。尽管卡利尔持有美国的合法永久居留权(即绿卡),但移民官员仍于2025年3月在曼哈顿他大学宿舍的大厅内将其逮捕。
A separate appeal of the immigration judge's order remains pending.A spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, in a statement said the Trump administration acted within its authority in Khalil's case, and it encouraged him to self-deport. Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war in Gaza, is an Algerian citizen who was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria. Immigration agents arrested him in March 2025 in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan despite his being a lawful permanent resident, or green-card holder.
他的妻子和他们1岁的儿子都是美国公民。国务卿马可·卢比奥援引《移民与国籍法》中一项鲜为人知的条款,以 Khalil 参与了2024年在哥伦比亚大学发生的“反犹太主义抗议活动及破坏性行为”为由,认定他应被驱逐出境;美国政府称这些行为为犹太学生营造了敌对的环境。2025年6月,在前总统乔·拜登任命的新泽西州地方法官迈克尔·法比亚兹的命令下,Khalil 被从路易斯安那州的拘留中心释放。
His wife and their 1-year-old son are both US citizens. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had invoked an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act to deem Khalil removable, citing his involvement in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities" at Columbia in 2024 that the government said fostered a hostile environment for Jewish students. He was released from a Louisiana detention center in June 2025 after the New Jersey-based US District Judge Michael Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ordered the Department of Homeland Security to release him.
然而,联邦上诉法院推翻了这一释放 Khalil 的裁决。1月份,第三巡回上诉法院以2比1的投票结果推翻了法比亚兹的判决,认为根据《移民与国籍法》,Khalil 的申诉不应通过地方法院处理,而应通过针对驱逐令的上诉程序来提出。在最高上诉法院拒绝重新审理此案后,Khalil 向最高法院求助。
Federal appeals court overturns ruling that secured Khalil's releaseIn January, a 2-1 panel of the 3rd Circuit overturned Farbiarz's decision, saying that under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Khalil's claims could not be addressed through a district court and instead could be raised in an appeal of a removal order from an immigration judge. After the full appeals court declined to reconsider the case, Khalil turned to the Supreme Court.
目前,联邦上诉法院在“地方法院是否有权审理类似案件”这一问题上存在分歧:一些法院认为地方法院有权审理此类案件,而另一些法院则认为此类申诉必须先通过隶属于美国司法部的移民法院进行处理。上个月,特朗普政府曾请求最高法院推翻另一起类似案件的裁决——该裁决支持乔治城大学学者巴达尔·汗·苏里(Badar Khan Suri)的申诉;苏里同样是一名支持巴勒斯坦的 aktivist,也曾被美国移民与海关执法局(ICE)拘留,后来被下令释放。
Federal appeals courts are split on whether district judges may hear challenges like Khalil's or whether such claims must proceed first through immigration courts, which are not part of the federal judiciary but are instead run by the US Department of Justice. The Trump administration last month asked the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling in a similar case favoring Georgetown University scholar Badar Khan Suri, another pro-Palestinian advocate detained by ICE who was ordered released.