内森·费尔德和兰斯·奥本海姆执导的伊丽莎白·霍尔姆斯纪录片《You Can See Everything》在周五（10月16日）于影院上映时，时长近三小时，为观众此前关于费尔德如何在霍尔姆斯入狱前获得如此广泛接触权限的疑问提供了一些答案。
Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes documentary, future audiences wondered how Fielder got such extensive access before her prison sentence. The nearly three-hour documentary offered some answers when it was released in theaters Friday, Oct. 16.
尽管采取有限上映，该片深受观众欢迎，首周末国内票房收入达1500万美元。
Despite its limited release, the film proved popular with audiences, grossing $15 million at the domestic box office in its opening weekend.
即便如此，费尔德、霍尔姆斯或两者的粉丝看完影片后，可能留下的疑问比答案还多。伊丽莎白·霍尔姆斯为何邀请内森·费尔德进入她的生活？
Even so, fans of Fielder, Holmes or both may leave the film with more questions than answers. Why did Elizabeth Holmes invite Nathan Fielder into her life?
影片最怪诞的地方之一，在于霍尔姆斯同意在入狱服刑前，拍摄她和家人的生活——她因欺诈投资者数亿美元而被判刑。
One of the film’s stranger aspects is Holmes agreeing to film her and her family before she goes to prison for defrauding investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
她声称自己的健康科技公司Theranos拥有血液检测技术，仅需一滴血即可进行多项诊断测试。
She claimed her health technology company Theranos had blood-testing technology that could perform several diagnostic tests with just one drop of blood.
科罗拉多州泰勒赖德——2026年9月6日：内森·费尔德在2026年泰勒赖德电影节《You Can See Everything》世界首映式上发言。
TELLURIDE, COLORADO – SEPTEMBER 06: Nathan Fielder speaks at the World Premiere of “You Can See Everything” at 2026 Telluride Film Festival on September 06, 2026 in Telluride, Colorado.
资料照片——前Theranos首席执行官伊丽莎白·霍尔姆斯于2022年10月17日抵达加利福尼亚州圣何塞联邦法院。霍尔姆斯再次败诉，未能在就血液检测骗局欺诈投资者的定罪提出上诉期间继续留在狱外。美国第九巡回上诉法院于2023年5月16日作出的一页裁决中认定，霍尔姆斯的上诉未能表明，她会因审判期间的错误而获得更短刑期或推翻定罪。
FILE – Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes arrives at federal court in San Jose, Calif., Oct. 17, 2022. Holmes has once again lost her bid to stay out of prison while she appeals her fraud conviction tied to a blood-testing hoax that bilked investors. In a one-page ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday, May 16, 2023, that Holmes’ appeal did not show that she would have received a shorter sentence or have her conviction reversed due to errors made during her trial.
费尔德以其社交笨拙、令人尴尬的喜剧风格著称——《You Can See Everything》中有许多此类例子——他在霍尔姆斯开始服11年刑期前34天，跟随并最终搬去与这位Theranos创始人及其伴侣比利·埃文斯共同生活。
Known for his socially awkward, cringeworthy comedic style — of which “You Can See Everything” has many examples — Fielder follows and eventually moves in with the Theranos founder and her partner, Billy Evans, 34 days before she began her 11-year prison sentence.
费尔德告诉《Wired》杂志，他在得知埃文斯和霍尔姆斯曾向制片公司推介过关于他们生活的纪录片但未果后，加入了该项目。
Fielder told Wired he joined the project after learning that Evans and Holmes had unsuccessfully pitched a documentary about their lives to the studio.
“几个月后，我听说这事发生了。于是我给A24打电话，说：‘那我能见见她吗？’一切就从那时开始了，”他说。尽管如此，费尔德表示，他并不完全理解为什么她同意让他记录自己的生活。
“Months later, I heard that had happened. So, I called A24 and said, ‘Well, could I meet her?’ That was the start of it all,” he said. Still, Fielder said he doesn’t fully understand why she agreed to let him chronicle her life.
“这是谜团的一部分，对我来说讲不通，”费尔德说。“我想是在我们拍摄的第一天之一，我就问过她这个问题。我至今仍不完全理解。”
“This is part of the mystery that, like, doesn’t make sense to me,” Fielder said. “I asked her that on, I think, one of the first days we shot. I still don’t fully understand it.”
他补充道：“这真的让我百思不得其解。而且我从很早就感觉到，她没看过太多我的作品，但看过一些，还跟看过我作品的人聊过。比利看得更多。”
He added, “That really messed with my head. Also, I got the sense very early that she hadn’t seen a lot, but she had seen some of what I did, and she had talked to people who had seen what I did. Billy had seen more.”
埃文斯在“All-In”播客的一期节目中给出了解释，称这对伴侣同意拍纪录片，是为了让人们“看清她是谁”。比利·埃文斯是在试图从霍尔姆斯的故事中牟利吗？
Evans offered an explanation on an episode of the “All-In” podcast, saying the couple agreed to do the documentary so people could “see who she is.”Was Billy Evans trying to profit from Holmes’ story?
霍尔姆斯看似是这部纪录片显而易见的“反派”，但有人认为，这个（不）光彩的头衔反而属于埃文斯——她两个孩子的父亲。
Holmes may seem like the documentary’s obvious “villain,” but some say that (dis)honor instead belongs to Evans, the father of her two children.
影片将埃文斯描绘成对霍尔姆斯和费尔德都表现出控制欲，甚至试图从费尔德手中夺走导演职责。
The film portrays Evans as controlling toward both Holmes and Fielder, from whom he essentially tries to grab directing duties.
圣何塞，加利福尼亚州——3月17日：前Theranos首席执行官伊丽莎白·霍尔姆斯与男友比利·埃文斯于2023年3月17日在加利福尼亚州圣何塞的罗伯特·E·派克汉姆联邦法院出席听证会后离开。霍尔姆斯出庭参加赔偿听证会。
SAN JOSE, CA – MARCH 17: Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes alongside her boyfriend Billy Evans, leaves a hearing at the Robert E. Peckham U.S. Courthouse on March 17, 2023 in San Jose, California. Holmes appeared in court for a restitution hearing.
影片中一个令人瞠目结舌的戏剧化重演场景显示，一名饰演埃文斯的演员解释称，如果能分得利润，他和霍尔姆斯就会参与拍摄，这并不符合纪录片的惯常做法。
In one of the film’s more jaw-dropping dramatizations, an actor portraying Evans explains he and Holmes would participate in the documentary if they received a share of the profits, which isn’t standard practice for documentaries.
据费尔德回忆，A24答应了埃文斯的要求，但费尔德纳闷霍尔姆斯——当时她不在伴侣提出要求的房间里——是否知情。内森·费尔德和观众是否被霍尔姆斯操纵了？
A24 agreed to Evans’ demands, but Fielder wondered if Holmes, who wasn’t in the room when her partner made the demands, knew about his request, according to Fielder’s retelling. Did Nathan Fielder and the audience get manipulated by Holmes?
这部纪录片将菲尔德和霍姆斯的互动呈现为紧张而又奇异亲密。菲尔德和奥本海姆使用了大量特写镜头（几乎过于特写）拍摄霍姆斯、埃文斯和菲尔德的面部。
The documentary presents Fielder and Holmes’ interactions as intense and strangely intimate. Fielder and Oppenheim use many close-up shots (almost too close) of Holmes’, Evans’ and Fielder’s faces.
这位失势的泰诺斯创始人与《彩排》创始人一对一交谈的场景尤其令人不安，充斥着尴尬的沉默和强烈的目光。
The scenes in which the disgraced Theranos founder speaks one-on-one with “The Rehearsal” creator are especially uncomfortable, marked by awkward silences and intense gazes.
整部纪录片中，菲尔德似乎都不确定该如何理解霍姆斯。她是在表演以博取同情吗？她是否不明白自己做错了什么？她是否没有意识到，埃文斯在纪录片中的奇怪行为可能被视为操纵？
Throughout the documentary, Fielder appears unsure how to understand Holmes. Was she putting on an act to gain sympathy? Did she not understand she did something wrong? Does she not see that Evans’ strange actions during the documentary can be viewed as manipulative?
到影片结束时，这些问题仍未得到解答，很可能会在片尾字幕滚动后长久地留在观众心中。
By the film’s conclusion, those questions remain unanswered, likely remaining with audiences long after the credits roll.