每周，MS NOW 法律分析师、我们的“Main Justice”播客联合主持人安德鲁·魏斯曼（Andrew Weissmann）都会在 MS NOW 会员专属系列节目“Answers with Andrew Weissmann”中回答观众提出的法律问题。在上方视频中，魏斯曼解答了来自佛罗里达州奥蒙德海滩的 MS NOW 会员琳达·S.（Linda S.）的提问：“国会能否阻止特朗普从俄罗斯购买柴油？”
Each week, MS NOW legal analyst Andrew Weissmann, co-host of our “Main Justice” podcast, answers legal questions from our audience in our MS NOW Membership exclusive series, “Answers with Andrew Weissmann.”In the video above, Weissmann addresses a question from MS NOW Member Linda S. from Ormond-by-the-Sea, Florida: “Can Congress stop Trump from purchasing diesel from Russia?”
请观看魏斯曼对国会通过的针对该问题的法规的见解——以及他对哪个政府分支未能正常运作的看法。本周魏斯曼解答的其他读者提问：虽然特朗普享有豁免权，但我以为那仅涉及他作为总统的公务；不涉及个人财富或与其职务无关的个人犯罪。是这样吗？
Watch for Weissmann’s insights on the statute Congress passed to address this issue — and his view of which branch of government isn’t functioning. Other reader questions Weissmann addressed this week: Although Trump has immunity, I thought that it only pertains to his official duties as president; not personal wealth or personal crimes not associated with the duties of his position. Is that correct?
既然最高法院六位大法官裁定总统因其作为总统所作所为享有豁免权，那他怎么会被弹劾？我们人民还有什么救济途径？——总统拥有广泛的赦免权。如果他赦免某人的金融犯罪，政府能否追回资金（假设另一个党派重新夺回白宫）？——美国检察官办公室分为刑事和民事两个部门。总统的赦免是否消除了司法部民事部门在特朗普卸任后追究个人责任的能力？
Since the SCOTUS6 ruled that the president has immunity for anything he does in his position as president, how can he be impeached? Do we the people have any recourse? —The president has wide pardon powers. If he pardons someone for financial crimes, can the funds be reclaimed by the government (assuming a different party takes back the White House)? —U.S. attorneys’ offices are divided between a criminal and civil division. Do the president’s pardons eliminate the DOJ Civil Division’s ability to go after individuals once Trump leaves office? —I’m asking about the DOJ’s longstanding, unspoken practices — for example, avoiding prosecutorial action before an election.
——我是在询问司法部长期以来不成文的惯例——例如在选举前避免采取起诉行动。显然，这些惯例应当转化为政策或法律。那么要实现这一点需要什么？应该由国会、司法部还是其他机构来推动？
Clearly, these practices ought to be turned into policies or law. So what is required in order for that to take place? Should it be Congress, the DOJ or someone else? .
当特朗普总统公开反驳其政府在法庭上的论点——正如我们在哥伦比亚特区高尔夫球场一案中所见——政府律师是否有义务纠正记录，即使这样做会削弱他们的案情？而特朗普自身的行为，究竟是否正在破坏旨在扩大总统权力的更广泛保守派法律努力？——MS NOW会员 成为MS NOW会员以
When President Trump publicly contradicts his own administration’s arguments in court, as we’ve seen with the D.C. golf courses, do government attorneys have an obligation to correct the record, even if doing so undermines their case? And is Trump’s own behavior ultimately undermining the broader conservative legal effort to expand presidential power? — MS NOW Member Become an MS NOW Member to