《华尔街日报》最近询问了1,500名选民关于国会和竞选活动中流传的一些主要政策主张，发现存在广泛的共识领域。
The Wall Street Journal found broad areas of agreement when it asked 1,500 voters recently about some of the top policy ideas circulating in Congress and on the campaign trail.
保守派、自由派和温和派都支持一系列旨在让医疗保健和其他开支更负担得起、以及遏制非法移民的想法。然而，一些想法则极具两极分化，并在意识形态界限上引发了强烈反对。
Conservatives, liberals and moderates all backed a set of ideas to make healthcare and other expenses more affordable, as well as to curb illegal immigration. Yet some ideas were sharply polarizing and drew staunch opposition along ideological lines.
参加我们的民调，看看你的观点与我们调查中的自由派、保守派和温和派相比如何。
Take our poll to see how your views compare with the liberals, conservatives and moderates in our survey.
美国往往因党派之争而显得两极分化严重。但我们的调查发现，意识形态光谱上的选民普遍渴望政府采取更多行动，通过价格上限或对企业的其他强制规定等措施，帮助民众应对生活成本。同时也有广泛共识认为，国家既需要安全的边境，也需要为目前非法居留在国内的许多移民提供合法化方案。
America often seems bitterly divided by partisanship. But our survey found that there is a broad hunger across the ideological spectrum for the government to do more to help people manage the cost of living through measures such as price caps or other mandates on business. And there is broad agreement that the nation needs both secure borders and a legalization plan for many immigrants currently in the country illegally.
与此同时，一些在意识形态光谱一端流行的想法，对另一端的选民来说则难以接受。在医疗保健政策和移民问题的其他方面达成共识的同时，“全民医保”方案被保守派拒绝，而终止出生公民权则遭到自由派和温和派选民的强烈反对。
At the same time, some ideas popular on one end of the ideological spectrum are a bridge too far for other voters. Amid agreement on other aspects of healthcare policy and immigration, Medicare for All was rejected by conservatives, while ending birthright citizenship drew strong opposition from liberal and moderate voters.
来源：《华尔街日报》对1,500名登记选民的民调，于2026年9月16日至21日实施；误差范围为正负2.5个百分点。
Source: Wall Street Journal poll of 1,500 registered voters, conducted Sept. 16-21, 2026; margin of error +/- 2.5 percentage points.