字号·· | 护眼
美联社

法官下令从电视和社交媒体撤下三则由纳税人资助的特朗普政府广告Judge orders 3 taxpayer-funded Trump administration ads to be pulled from TV and social media

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

拉里·诺迈斯特、阿里·斯文森 纽约——一名法官周五裁定,联邦政府必须从电视和社交媒体网站上撤下三则由纳税人资助的特朗普政府广告,这些广告似乎出于政治或宣传目的制作,其中一则鼓吹总统的说法,即如果共和党在中期选举中保住众议院和参议院控制权,每个美国人将获得5000美元。

LARRY NEUMEISTER, ALI SWENSON NEW YORK — The federal government must pull three taxpayer-funded Trump administration ads from television and social media sites that appear to have been made for political or propaganda purposes, including one that trumpets the president’s claim that every American will get $5,000 if Republicans keep control of the House and Senate in the midterm election, a judge ruled Friday.

纽约联邦地区法官詹妮弗·L·罗雄站在包括无党派监督机构“共同事业”在内的一个联盟一边,下令政府撤下题为“给美国人的5000美元”、“每位民主党人都投票反对小费免税”和“社会主义的代价”的广告。她表示,这些广告必须从官方政府网站上撤下,包括YouTube、Instagram或其他类似网站等社交媒体网站。她还下令,取消通过授权第三方(包括特朗普的旗舰超级政治行动委员会“MAGA Inc.”)播出或传播这些广告的任何时段、投放位置、预订或安排。

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition, including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, in ordering the government to take down the s entitled ”$5,000 to Americans,” “Every Democrat Voted Against No Tax on Tips,” and “Cost of Socialism.”She said they must be taken off official government websites, including social media sites such as YouTube, Instagram, or other similar sites. She also ordered that any slots, placements, reservations, or arrangements for the airing or dissemination of the ads through authorized third parties, including by Trump’s flagship super PAC MAGA Inc., be canceled.

罗雄由时任总统、民主党人乔·拜登提名出任该法院法官。她在听证会上作出上述裁决,听证中她考虑扩大两周前发布的临时限制令,当时她禁止了一系列美化总统唐纳德·特朗普、并在中期选举前呼应其政治信息的广告。

Rochon, who was nominated to the court by then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, ruled during a hearing in which she considered expanding a temporary restraining order she issued two weeks ago when she banned a series of ads that glorify President Donald Trump and echo his political messaging going into the midterms.

白宫为这些广告辩护,称其类似于历届政府为宣传各种政策而制作的公益广告。但原告表示,这些近期广告与许多过去的公益广告不同,因为它们并非旨在帮助公众从具体政府项目中受益。

The White House has defended the ads as public service announcements akin to what past administrations have made to promote various policies. But the recent ads differ from many past public service announcements because they aren’t aimed at helping members of the public benefit from specific government programs, according to the plaintiffs.

罗雄发布命令后指出,她是在周五下午作出这一裁决的,政府没有任何借口拖延立即撤下这些广告。

After Rochon issued the order, she noted that she was doing so on a Friday afternoon and that the government would have no excuse to delay taking them down immediately.

一名政府律师承认,他能够立即通知负责撤下这些广告的相关人员。

A government lawyer acknowledged that he would be able to immediately notify relevant individuals responsible for taking down the ads.

阅读媒体原文 ↗