字号·· | 护眼
福克斯新闻网

加州五孩父亲称特许学校拒绝甚至仅提及上帝的书籍,并设“出版商黑名单”California dad of 5 says charter school rejected books that even mentioned God, 'Publisher blacklist'

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

约翰·伍拉德、他的妻子布蕾安娜及家人。(第一自由研究所)John Woolard, his wife Breanna, and their family. (First Liberty Institute)

一位加利福尼亚州的五子之父表示,他家庭所在的公立特许学校拒绝了仅仅提及上帝或信仰的家庭教育教材,即使这些书籍符合州学术标准,迫使他的家庭自掏腰包购买教育资源,而他表示其他家长可以用公共资金获取这些资源。

A California father of five says his family's public charter school rejected homeschooling materials that merely mentioned God or faith, even when the books met state academic standards, forcing his family to pay out of pocket for educational resources he says other parents could access with public funds.

约翰·伍拉德告诉福克斯新闻数字版,他和妻子最初在使用一项允许他们在家教育孩子的公立特许学校项目时没有遇到问题。但他表示,他们最终发现自己的课程选择因宗教内容而受到审查。

John Woolard told Fox News Digital that he and his wife initially had no problems using a public charter school program that allowed them to educate their children at home. But he said they eventually discovered that their curriculum choices were being scrutinized for religious content.

伍拉德说:“我们想购买的任何书籍或课程,哪怕只是以一种附带的方式提及上帝或信仰,都会被拒绝。”

"Any book or curriculum purchase that we wanted to make that referenced God or faith in even like an adjacent sort of way was being denied," Woolard said.

他描述了所谓的“出版社黑名单”,并表示限制范围超出了明确的基督教教学材料。

He described what he called a "publisher blacklist" and said the restrictions extended beyond explicitly Christian instructional materials.

伍拉德说,甚至连考察美国建国先贤宗教信仰的书籍也遇到了问题。

Woolard said he even encountered problems with books examining the religious beliefs of America's Founding Fathers.

他说:“你会认为这应该是无可争议的,但那些课程选择也会被拒绝。”

"You would think that that would be something that would be non-controversial, but those curriculum choices would be denied," he said.

对伍拉德来说,这场争议超越了宗教表达的范畴。作为五个孩子的父亲,他说该特许学校项目提供了一种经济高效的方式,可以根据每个孩子的个别需求量身定制课程。

For Woolard, the dispute goes beyond religious expression. As a father of five, he said the charter school program provided a cost-effective way to tailor the curriculum to each child's individual needs.

但他表示,当学校拒绝某些课程采购时,他的家庭只能自行承担费用。

But when the school rejected certain curriculum purchases, he said, his family was left covering the costs.

伍拉德告诉福克斯新闻数字版:“如果我们的课程选择被拒绝,那么我们就必须为那些资源、为那些课程选择自掏腰包。”伍拉德说,他曾向学校官员追问拒绝这些教材的原因。

"If our curriculum choices are denied, then we have to pay for those resources, we have to pay for those curriculum choices out of pocket," Woolard told Fox News Digital. Woolard said he pressed school officials to explain why the materials were being rejected.

他询问课程是否符合加州标准,以及是否具有足够的学术严谨性。据伍拉德称,这两个问题的答案都是肯定的。

He asked whether the curriculum met California standards and whether it was academically rigorous enough. According to Woolard, the answer to both questions was yes.

伍拉德家的孩子们在学习。(第一自由研究所)The Woolard kids studying. (First Liberty Institute)

“归根结底,你对这套课程、我们的课程选择唯一的反对理由,就是它包含信仰成分,”伍拉德回忆说,他当时这样问道。他说,一名教师和一名校长都承认,宗教成分是反对的理由。“这告诉我,平等只延伸到政府批准的范围,”他说。

"So, at the end of the day, the only objection that you have to this curriculum, our curriculum choices, is that there's a faith component to it," Woolard said he recalled asking. He said both a teacher and principal acknowledged that the religious component was the objection. "What that tells me is that equality only extends as far as what the government approves," he said.

第一自由研究所高级法律顾问斯蒂芬妮·托布在接受Fox News Digital采访时表示,该政策歧视寻求信仰教育的家庭。

Stephanie Taub, senior counsel with First Liberty Institute, characterized the policy as discriminatory toward families seeking a faith-based education during an interview with Fox News Digital.

约翰和布蕾安娜·伍拉德。(第一自由研究所)John and Breanna Woolard. (First Liberty Institute)

“我们在这里要求的是,加利福尼亚州有一项政策,专门针对想给孩子提供信仰教育的家长,将他们排除在本可享受的家庭教育福利之外,”这位律师说。

"What we're asking here is California has a policy that singles out parents who want to give their children a faith-based education, and it excludes them from homeschooling benefits that would otherwise be available," the attorney said.

托布说,在下级法院作出不利判决后,该家庭正寻求最高法院介入。伍拉德说,他希望大法官最终能迫使加利福尼亚州改变做法。

Taub said the family is seeking Supreme Court intervention after an unfavorable lower-court decision. Woolard said he hopes the justices will ultimately force California to change its approach.

“我真正希望的是,政府或最高法院能回过头来告诉加利福尼亚州,你们判错了,这是纠正的方法,”他说。

"What I really hope is for the government or for the Supreme Court to come back and tell California you got the decision wrong and this is the way to correct it," he said.

他补充说,这样的裁决可能会“为许多寻求类似变革的家庭打开加利福尼亚州的大门”。

He added that such a ruling could "break open California for a lot of families" seeking similar changes.

美国最高法院正在考虑是否受理一起挑战加利福尼亚州对公立资助居家教育项目中宗教材料限制的案件。(安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社)The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to take up a case challenging California's restrictions on religious materials in publicly funded homeschooling programs. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

托布说,最高法院正在考虑是否受理此案,她预计在未来几个月内会得知大法官是否会审理。

Taub said the Supreme Court is considering whether to take the case and that she expects to hear whether the justices will review it in the next few months.

加利福尼亚州教育部的一位发言人告诉Fox News Digital,该部门无法对正在进行的诉讼发表评论。

A spokesperson for the California Department of Education told Fox News Digital that the department cannot comment on pending litigation.

阅读媒体原文 ↗