自10月下旬以来，游戏开发者不断遭到Claude Code的拒绝，有些人表示，他们被拒绝的项目是自己有权开发的。布鲁诺·费雷拉周六为Tom's Hardware报道了这些投诉，援引了Claude Code公开GitHub跟踪器上的一波问题。TNW阅读了这些问题。
Game developers have been hitting refusals from Claude Code since late October, some on projects they say they have a right to build. Bruno Ferreira reported the complaints for Tom’s Hardware on Saturday, citing a wave of issues on Claude Code’s public GitHub tracker. TNW read the issues.
Anthropic尚未宣布任何变更，其Claude Code更新日志中也没有提及相关变动。Tom's Hardware表示，官方没有发表声明。
Anthropic has not announced a change, and its Claude Code changelog does not mention one. Tom’s Hardware said there was no official statement.
一位开发者报告的情况是，Conflict Simulations LLC的所有者为拥有游戏版权的客户制作桌游战争游戏的个性化数字版本。这位开发者在10月30日的GitHub问题中写道，大约在10月27日，Claude Code开始收到“服务器端指令”，要求拒绝游戏相关工作。现在会话会拒绝这些工作，理由是有一条禁止复制游戏的指令。
What one developer reports The owner of Conflict Simulations LLC builds personalised digital versions of board wargames for clients who own the games. Around 27 October, Claude Code began getting “a server-side instruction” to refuse game work, the developer wrote in a GitHub issue on 30 October. Sessions now refuse the work, citing an instruction against reproducing games.
“一条针对‘游戏’的一刀切类别规则，无法区分盗版和为游戏所有者进行的委托专业工作。”Conflict Simulations LLC的所有者在GitHub上写道。在一次更新中，这位开发者表示，据称该规则到来后，会话仍在继续做这些工作。拒绝只在他们要求Claude检查该规则是否影响其项目之后才开始。在针对同一代码的新会话中，拒绝仍在继续。一位评论者提出，该项目的记忆或Git历史现在带上了这一拒绝指令，开发者表示他们将尝试清除它。
“A blanket category rule against ‘games’ cannot tell the difference between piracy and commissioned professional work for a game’s owner.”The owner of Conflict Simulations LLC, on GitHub In an update, the developer said the sessions kept doing the work after the rule reportedly arrived. The refusals began only after they asked Claude to check whether the rule affected their projects. They continued in new sessions on the same code. One commenter suggested the project’s memory or Git history now carried the refusal, and the developer said they would try to clear it.
这位开发者写道，Anthropic的支持机器人告诉他们，该政策适用于所有客户，没有例外。两个支持工单后来都被转交给工作人员，开发者已提出申诉。他们要求Anthropic将规则对准真正的版权侵权行为，并为专业人士提供一条验证途径。
Anthropic’s support bot told the developer the policy covers all customers, with no exception, the developer wrote. Both support tickets were later passed to staff, and the developer has filed an appeal. They asked Anthropic to aim the rule at real copyright infringement and to offer a verification path for professionals.
更广泛的背景是，并非帖子中的所有人都同意。一位评论者表示，除非这些工作是为权利持有人做的，否则它与其他任何逆向工程移植没有区别。
The wider context Not everyone on the thread agreed. One commenter said that unless the work is for the rights holders, it is no different from any other reverse-engineered port.
其他开发者本月报告了另一种封锁情况。Claude Code的网络防护机制标记了一名开发者游戏中的反作弊代码，以及另一名开发者对自己游戏进行的安全审查。《汤姆硬件》表示，这两种限制在时间上的接近可能只是巧合。
Other developers reported a separate kind of block this month. Claude Code’s cyber safeguards flagged anti-cheat code for one developer’s game and a security review of another’s own game. Tom’s Hardware said the timing of the two kinds of restriction may be a coincidence.
Anthropic表示，其普遍可用的模型设有保守的网络防护机制，会阻止大多数网络相关工作。10月6日，该公司扩大了其“网络验证计划”，该计划为经过审核的安全团队解除部分此类封锁。其早先针对Mythos模型推出的“玻璃翼计划”成员将进入最高层级。
Anthropic says its generally available models have conservative cyber safeguards that block most cyber work. On 6 October it expanded its Cyber Verification Program, which lifts some of those blocks for vetted security teams. Members of Project Glasswing, its earlier programme for its Mythos model, move into the top tier.
该公司还面临版权索赔，包括10月就274首猫王歌曲提起的诉讼。另外，10月29日，一个被篡改的Claude Code扩展程序触及了Cursor用户。Anthropic尚未说明该游戏规则是否存在，或者是否会提供豁免途径。
The company also faces copyright claims, including a suit over 274 Elvis Presley songs filed in October. Separately, a tampered Claude Code extension reached Cursor users on 29 October. Anthropic has not said whether the game rule exists or will get an exemption path.