印度CJP抗议者将矛头指向选举委员会主席穆拉利·克里希南 2026年9月28日在协助迫使印度教育部长辞职之后，这场由青年主导的抗议运动如今正针对选举委员会发起挑战，起因是选民名册修订过程中引发的争议。本周末计划举行新的抗议活动。
India's CJP protesters target election commission chief Murali Krishnan September 28, 2026 After helping force the resignation of India's education minister, a youth-led protest movement is now taking on the election commission amid controversy over voter rolls. New protests are planned for this weekend.
这些得到反对派团体支持的抗议活动，标志着对印度总理纳伦德拉·莫迪政府的新政治挑战。印度由青年主导的“蟑螂人民党”（CJP）及反对党在一家报纸的调查报道指控选民名册大规模修订过程中存在不当行为后，要求首席选举专员吉亚内什·库马尔辞职。
The protests, which are backed by opposition groups, mark a new political challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi India 's youth-led Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and opposition parties have demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar after a newspaper investigation alleged impropriety during a large-scale voter-roll revision.
据《印度快报》发表的调查报道显示，去年启动的所谓选民名册“特别强化修订”（SIR）中，一些关键决定很可能是在未经三名选举专员中两人批准的情况下做出的。
According to the probe, published The Indian Express newspaper, some key decisions linked to the so-called Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls that began last year were likely taken without the approval of two of the three election commissioners.
报道称，选举专员苏克比尔·辛格·桑杜和维韦克·乔希在10个月内，就选民登记、删除与恢复以及选民名册数据控制等决定，至少提出了14次正式异议。
said that fellow Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had raised at least 14 formal objections over 10 months to decisions concerning voter registrations, deletions and restorations, as well as control of electoral-roll data.
CJP创始人阿比吉特·迪普克称库马尔是“对印度民主的最大威胁”【资料图片：2025年10月27日】在一份异议中，桑杜抱怨印度选举委员会（ECI）违背了两名专员的书面建议行事，并声称该行为“未经授权且违法”。印度选举委员会在一份声明中表示，这些指控“只是情况的一部分”，而“不同意见”是决策过程中常规的“组成部分”。该声明被当地媒体引用。“蟑螂”运动创始人呼吁举行示威CJP创始人阿比吉特·迪普克周四在新闻发布会上称库马尔是“对印度民主的最大威胁”，并要求其辞职。
CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke called Kumar 'the biggest threat to India's democracy' [FILE: October 27, 2025] In one of the objections, Sandhu complained that the Election Commission of India (ECI) acted against the written advice of two commissioners and claimed its action was "unauthorized and illegal." The allegations presented "only one part of the picture," and "differing views" were a routine "part of decision-making," the ECI said in a statement cited by local media. 'Cockroach' movement founder calls for demonstrations Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke called Kumar "the biggest threat to India's democracy" and demanded his resignation.
迪普克威胁称，如果库马尔在周六之前不辞职，他们将从10月2日（印度国父圣雄甘地的诞辰日）开始，在全国范围内发起抗议活动。然而，周六的截止日期过去了，库马尔仍未辞职。
Dipke threatened to launch nationwide protests, beginning in Mumbai on October 2, the birthday of India's founding father Mahatma Gandhi, if Kumar did not quit by Saturday. The Saturday deadline passed without Kumar stepping down.
在孟买警方拒绝批准原定于10月2日举行的抗议活动后，迪普克在社交媒体上呼吁支持者们选择接受大规模逮捕，而不是遵守政府的禁令。尽管存在这些限制，支持者们仍在周五举行了抗议活动，并表示会继续动员民众。
After Mumbai police denied permission for the planned October 2 protest, Dipke posted on X calling on supporters to submit to mass arrests rather than comply with the ban. Supporters staged protests on Friday and pledged to continue mobilizing despite the restrictions.
反对党也呼应了CJP对库马尔及印度选举委员会的批评。主要反对党国大党的帕万·克赫拉表示：“吉亚内什·库马尔的所作所为简直就是叛国行为。”他在社交媒体上写道：“如果与选举相关的重要决定是在三位选举委员会委员中仅有两人不知情或未获得其批准的情况下作出的……那么这些决定以及整个选举程序在法律上都是无效的。”
Opposition parties echoed the CJP's criticism of Kumar and the Election Commission. Pawan Khera of the main opposition Congress party said that "Gyanesh Kumar has done nothing short of treason." "If decisions relating to the SIR were taken without the knowledge or approval of two of the three election commissioners... then those decisions and the entire SIR exercise are legally invalid," Khera said on social media.
国大党及其他反对党指责印度选举委员会与执政的印度人民党（BJP）勾结，企图操纵选民名单以赢得选举；不过，选举委员会和印度人民党都否认了这些指控。
Congress and other opposition parties have accused the ECI of colluding with India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to manipulate voter lists and win state elections in recent years, charges both the commission and the BJP have denied. What are the demands of India's CJP movement?
那么，印度“CJP运动”的具体诉求是什么呢？这个在社交媒体上拥有数百万追随者的组织曾在7月份迫使教育部长达尔门德拉·普拉丹辞职——当时学生们发起了大规模街头抗议活动。该组织提出了三项要求：库马尔必须辞职并受到刑事起诉；应暂停所有即将举行的选举；同时应废除2023年关于选举委员会成员任命的相关法律。
'Cockroach' movement which has millions of followers on social media, forced Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to resign in July following widespread student-led street protests. The group has laid out three demands: Kumar's resignation and criminal proceedings against him, a freeze on the SIR and the suspension of all upcoming elections, and the repeal of the 2023 law on the appointment of the election commissioners of India.
值得注意的是，这个“CJP运动”所引发的社会影响十分深远。民权活动家阿姆里塔·乔赫里指出，CJP选择针对印度选举委员会的行动，实际上反映了人们对选举程序缺乏透明度的普遍担忧。
India's Cockroach movement — and why it matters To view this video , and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Civil rights activist Amrita Johri said the CJP's decision to target the poll panel reflects wider concerns over the lack of transparency surrounding the SIR.
Johri 告诉德国之声：“发起这项工作缺乏公众咨询或明确解释，加上报纸发现两名选举委员曾对关键决定提出反复异议。”
"There is an absence of public consultation or a clear explanation for launching the exercise, as well as the findings of the newspaper that the two election commissioners had raised repeated objections to key decisions," Johri told DW.
“恢复公众信心需要库马尔下台、停止 SIR（注：原文缩写，推测为特定行动或审查名称）以及对草案名单中被排除的数百万名选民进行独立审查。”从教育抗议到选举政治政治活动家苏德欣德·库尔卡尼认为，CJP（公民正义与和平组织）的最新行动属于施压团体的行为，而非新兴的独立政治力量。
"Restoring public confidence will require Kumar's removal, stopping the SIR and an independent review of the millions of names excluded from the draft rolls." From education protests to electoral politics Political activist Sudheendra Kulkarni sees the CJP's latest campaign as that of a pressure group rather than an emerging standalone political force.
库尔卡尼告诉德国之声：“我看不出 CJP 有任何独立的政治未来。它可能会作为一个施压团体存在一段时间。但随着下届议会选举临近，它将不得不与反对党联盟结盟。”其他人则认为 CJP 的转型分量更重。教育部长向“蟑螂”诉求妥协并辞职政治分析师兼评论员拉迪卡·拉马塞尚表示，CJP 扩大关注范围不会削弱其发起的初衷。
"I do not see any separate political future for the CJP. It may remain as a pressure group for some time. But as the next parliamentary election approaches, it will have to align itself with the opposition alliance," Kulkarni told DW. Others see greater weight in the CJP's shift. Education minister concedes to 'Cockroach' demands, resigns Political analyst and commentator Radhika Ramaseshan said the CJP widening its focus will not weaken what it started.
拉马塞尚告诉德国之声：“我不认为如果 CJP 扩大了关注范围并围绕这些议题发起抗议，会削弱其最初凸显问题的显著性和力度。选民权利和参政权是公民生存的根本，也是维护印度宪法神圣性的基石。”“这些不是抽象概念或程序性问题。它们关乎首次投票者的切身利益，而这群人构成了 CJP 的主体。”她补充道。接下来会发生什么？
"I don't think if the CJP enlarged the ambit of its concerns and built protests around [them], it would take away from the salience and power of the first issue it highlighted," Ramaseshan told DW. "Voter rights and enfranchisement is fundamental to a citizen's existence, to upholding the sanctity of the Indian constitution." "These are not abstractions or procedural matters. They impinge on the lives of first-time voters who make up the bulk of the CJP," she added. What happens now?
随着库马尔拒绝辞职，关注点现在将转向 CJP 承诺于 10 月 2 日在孟买发起的街头抗议活动。
With Kumar refusing to resign, attention will now turn to the CJP's promise of street protests starting in Mumbai on October 2.
但仅靠一个抗议团体无法直接罢免首席选举委员。根据印度宪法，罢免首席选举委员需要议会两院采取行动并获得特别多数通过，理由必须是经证实的不当行为或丧失能力。
But a protest group alone cannot simply remove a CEC. Under India's constitution, the CEC can be removed only through a process requiring action by both houses of Parliament and a special majority, on grounds of proved misbehavior or incapacity.
前首席选举专员S·Y·库雷希对德国之声表示：“公民正义与和平组织（CJP）的意义在于增加压力，迫使对印度选举委员会（ECI）的运作进行审视。”
"The CJP's significance would be in increasing pressure and forcing scrutiny of the ECI's functioning," former Chief Election Commissioner S Y Quraishi's told DW.
他认为，报道中提到的单方面决定才是更严重的问题，应接受独立的法律和技术审计。
He argues that the reported unilateral decisions are the more serious issue and should be subjected to an independent legal and technical audit.
他说：“切实可行的途径是司法审查，而不是街头罢免。在三人组成的委员会中，首席选举专员单方面做出的决定可能被质疑为无效，届时可能需要最高法院介入。”库雷希补充道：“选举委员会不作为时，最高法院就必须介入。”
"The practical route is judicial scrutiny, not street removal. The decisions taken unilaterally by the CEC in a three-member commission could be challenged as invalid, with the Supreme Court potentially needed to intervene," he said. "Where the commission will not act, the Supreme Court will have to step in," added Quraishi.
公民正义与和平组织（CJP）的最新行动将其直接置入印度关于选举管理最具争议的纠纷核心。
The CJP's latest campaign puts it directly into one of India's most contentious disputes over electoral administration.
这场运动能否保持势头、对抗选举委员会，将是对这个仍在努力确立其在印度政治中定位的运动的完全不同的考验。编辑：基思·沃克
Whether it can sustain that momentum against the Election Commission will be a very different test for a movement that is still trying to define its place in Indian politics. Edited by: Keith Walker