参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩对特朗普总统与科技和人工智能巨头于周二签署的新“宪法”表示欢迎，但他表示，他将致力于通过立法将一些安全保护措施“法典化”。
Senate Majority Leader John Thunewelcomed the new "constitution" that President Trump and tech and AI leaders signed Tuesday but said he would work to "codify" some safety protections with legislation.
为何重要：图恩和其他共和党参议员并未直接挑战特朗普对行业主导的安全保障机制的偏好。但他们暗示，昨天的协议——特朗普称其为“具有道义约束力”——可能还不够。
Why it matters: Thune and other GOP senators aren't directly challenging Trump's preference for industry-led safeguards. But they suggest yesterday's accord — which Trump called "morally binding" — might not be enough.
“我认为这很好，”南达科他州共和党参议员图恩周三对Axios表示，“这无疑是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。”他说：“我们一直在国会讨论，是否能制定某种立法框架，将一些安全保护措施也以法律形式固定下来。”
"I think this is good," Thune (R-S.D.) told Axios on Wednesday. "This is certainly a step in the right direction." "We are continuing to have those conversations up here on whether or not we can come up with some sort of a legislative framework that would codify some safety protections too," he said.
内幕：参议院共和党人对人工智能和前沿实验室抱有一股潜在的怀疑态度。
The intrigue: There's an undercurrent of skepticism in the Senate GOP about AI and the frontier labs.
“我不是说他们不关心人类，但他们也关心——我给你三个字母：I-P-O（首次公开募股）——他们关心的是利润，”路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪说。
"I'm not saying they don't care about humanity, but they also care — I'll give you three letters: I-P-O — and they care about profits," said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.).
“我对他们的信任度基本上就像信任高速公路休息室的洗手间一样，”肯尼迪说。
"I pretty much trust them like a rest-stop bathroom," Kennedy said.
弦外之音：众议院议长迈克·约翰逊（路易斯安那州共和党人）出席了白宫会议，与世界上一些最富有、最有权势的科技高管同桌而坐。
Between the lines: Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was at the White House meeting, sitting at a table with some of the world's wealthiest and most powerful tech executives.
图恩没有出席，但他在周一晚上于其参议院办公室与Anthropic公司首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代伊举行了单独会谈，后者是该行业监管前沿人工智能的主要倡导者之一。
Thune was not, but he had a separate meeting Monday night in his Senate office with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, one of the industry's leading advocates for regulating frontier AI.
细节：在国会需要监管人工智能行业这一点上，图恩表现得比约翰逊更为坚定。
Zoom in: Thune has been more assertive than Johnson about the need for Congress to regulate the AI industry.
图恩上周对Axios表示：“我确实认为这些威胁是真实的。我认为你至少必须制定某种计划并在其周围设置护栏。”约翰逊似乎更倾向于一种不干涉的方法：“面临的挑战在于，要在国会就所有这些问题达成共识非常困难。这项技术变化太快了，”约翰逊周二表示。"白宫和国会将继续以安全的方式引导行业发展，"约翰逊说。"
"I do think that the threats are real," Thune told Axios last week. "I think you have to have at least some sort of a plan and some guardrails around it." Johnson appears to favor a more hands-off approach: "The challenge has been that finding consensus on all of this in Congress is very difficult. The technology changes rapidly," Johnson said Tuesday. "The White House and Congress will continue to guide the industry's development in a safe manner," Johnson said.
国会将继续稳握方向盘。" 核心在于：图恩的一些共和党同僚同意国会需要采取行动，而另一些人则倾向于特朗普的放任自流做法。"你必须有成文法、法律和法规的约束力，"参议员约翰·霍文（共和党，北达科他州）说。"就像任何其他行业一样，这并非超级智能所独有。" "归根结底，企业必须自己做正确的事，"参议员里克·斯科特（共和党，佛罗里达州）说。"
"Congress is going to keep steady hands at the wheel on this." The bottom line: Some of Thune's GOP colleagues agree Congress needs to act, while others favor Trump's laissez-faire approach. "You have to have the strength of statute and law and regulation," said Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.). "Like for any other industry, this is not unique to super intelligence." "Ultimately, the companies have got to do the right thing themselves," said Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.).
我对国会能否制定出正确的AI解决方案有信心吗？并没有，"参议员罗恩·约翰逊（共和党，威斯康星州）说。"最终，我认为我们需要做的是维护竞争。" "国会也应该有所作为，而不是坐视旁观，"参议员乔什·霍利（共和党，密苏里州）说。
"Do I have confidence Congress would craft the right solution on AI? Not really," said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). "In the end, I think what we need to do is preserve competition." "Congress should do something too, rather than sit back and spectate," said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).