到目前为止，美国在监管该技术方面一直采取不干预的态度。但这种策略正变得难以为继。在本周的《内部人士》节目中，我们的专家小组讨论了监管的必要性。
Until now, America has taken a hands-off approach to regulating the technology. But that strategy is becoming unsustainable. On The Insider this week our panel of experts discuss the case for regulation.
伦敦时间下午6点收听节目。“谁赢得了人工智能，谁就赢得了未来！”唐纳德·特朗普在谈到人工智能时从不含糊。到目前为止，美国在监管该技术方面一直采取不干预的态度。相反，总统倾向于提振股市，并确保美国在人工智能领域击败中国。
Tune in from 6pm London time“Whoever wins AI, WINS!”Donald Trump doesn’t mince his words about artificial intelligence. Until now, America has taken a hands-off approach to regulating the technology. Instead the president has favoured boosting the stock market and ensuring that America beats China in AI.
但这种策略正变得难以为继。美国人对从数据中心到就业保障等方方面面的问题日益感到焦虑，而人工智能代理失控的事件也为未来可能发生的灾难敲响了警钟。
But that strategy is becoming unsustainable. Americans are increasingly anxious about everything from data centres to job security, while incidents of agents going rogue are warnings for the catastrophes that could lie ahead.
随着反人工智能情绪的增长，以及中期选举的临近，特朗普政府可能不得不重新评估应如何监管人工智能。
With anti-AI sentiment growing, and the midterms fast approaching, the Trump administration may have to reassess how AI should be regulated.
《经济学人》副主编爱德华·卡尔（Edward Carr）与我们的主编扎尼·明顿·贝多斯（Zanny Minton Beddoes）以及我们的专家小组一起，讨论了监管的必要性，以及如何在安全与速度之间取得适当的平衡。
Edward Carr, The Economist’s deputy editor, is joined by Zanny Minton Beddoes, our editor-in-chief, and a panel of our experts to discuss the case for regulation and how to strike the right balance between safety and speed.