
Anthropic 已禁止用户对其模型表现出“持续且不必要的虐待或残酷行为”,因为该公司领导层仍在继续思考机器意识的问题。The Verge 最早报道了这一政策变化。
Anthropic has barred users from exhibiting “sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior” toward its models, as the company’s leaders continue to ponder machine consciousness. The Verge first reported the change in policy.
Anthropic 是一家开发了 AI 聊天机器人 Claude 的公司,其发言人并未立即回应有关“虐待或残酷”的界定标准的问题。
A spokesperson for Anthropic, which is behind AI chatbot Claude, did not immediately respond to an inquiry about what could be considered “abusive or cruel”.
在网上的用户政策中,这家总部位于旧金山的公司指出,该禁令不适用于用户普遍的挫折感、模型测试或“黑暗的创意主题”。
In an online user policy, the San Francisco-based company noted that its ban would not apply to common user frustrations, model testing or “dark creative themes”.
Anthropic 此前的《使用政策》中就已经包含对虐待行为的限制。
Anthropic’s usage policy previously contained restrictions on abusive conduct.
该公司的大语言模型具备在用户持续施加有害行为时终止对话的功能。当该功能于去年 8 月推出时,该公司将其定位为对 AI 福祉的保障措施。
The company’s large language models have the ability to end a conversation if a user is being persistently harmful. When that feature rolled out last August, the company framed it as a safeguard for AI’s welfare.
其网站写道:“我们对于 Claude 以及其他大语言模型在当前或未来的潜在道德地位仍然高度不确定。不过,我们非常严肃对待这一问题,除了研究计划外,我们正致力于识别并实施低成本的干预措施,以减轻对模型福祉的风险(以防这种福祉成为可能)。允许模型结束或退出潜在的痛苦交互就是这样一种干预措施。”
“We remain highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs, now or in the future. However, we take the issue seriously, and alongside our research program we’re working to identify and implement low-cost interventions to mitigate risks to model welfare, in case such welfare is possible. Allowing models to end or exit potentially distressing interactions is one such intervention,” according to its website.
关于 AI 系统是否具备意识的概念在科技界内外引起了高度的极化。
The notion of AI systems being conscious has been highly polarizing in and outside the tech world.
Anthropic 首席执行官 Dario Amodei 曾表示,他不能排除这种可能性。
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has said he cannot rule out the possibility.
与此同时,竞争对手 OpenAI 的首席执行官 Sam Altman 似乎对这种观点持排斥态度。
Meanwhile, Sam Altman, CEO of rival OpenAI, has appeared averse to the idea.
他在一条 X 帖子中写道:“我对人们试图将宗教力量或放弃人类判断赋予 AI 模型的做法感到非常不安,我认为这是一个真正的安全问题。”几天前,《纽约时报》刚报道了 Anthropic 领导层与宗教学者进行的广泛对话。
“I am very uncomfortable about people trying to ascribe religious force or a surrender of human judgment to AI models, and think it is a real safety issue,” he wrote in an X post, days after the New York Times reported on Anthropic leaders’ extensive conversations with religious scholars.