字号·· | 护眼
国会山报

特朗普提案引发幼教工作者担忧工作条件将更严苛Early childhood educators fear tougher working conditions amid Trump proposals

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

学前教育工作者正对特朗普政府提出的放松行业监管的方案发出警报,例如调整师生比例。在政府提议的公众意见征求期结束后,倡导者们坐立不安——该提议旨在取消统一的Head Start项目(该项目服务来自低收入家庭的70万儿童),转而采取各州自行制定的众多监管方式。但该行业本就因人手短缺和低薪问题困扰重重——教育工作者担忧这些变化将使工作变得更加艰难。

Early childhood educators are sounding the alarm at changes proposed by the Trump administration to loosen regulations on the industry such as staff-to-child ratios. Advocates are on the edge of their seats after the public comment period closed on a proposal from the administration that would take a unified Head Start, a program that serves 700,000 children from low-income households, and create a state-by-state approach for many regulations. But in an industry already plagued by staffing shortages and low pay — educators fear these changes will make the job even more difficult.

全美幼儿教育协会(NAEYC)对近4000名学前教育工作者的调查显示,多数人担心增加师生比例会使他们的工作更加困难,并对所有人构成安全隐患。80%的受访者表示,更大的班级规模将使满足学生个体需求变得更难;78%的人认为,由于倦怠,离开该行业的人数将增加。超过一半的学前教育工作者表示,如果师生比例提高,他们很可能会离职。

A survey of almost 4,000 early childhood educators from the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) found a majority worry that increasing staff-to-child ratios will make their jobs harder and pose as a safety issue for everyone involved. Eighty percent say bigger group sizes would make it harder to meet students’ individual needs, and 78 percent said there is greater risk of more people leaving the industry due to burnout. More than half of early childhood educators said they would be likely to leave if the ratios increased.

明尼苏达州Windy Willow幼儿园的工作者特里西亚·赫尔塞瑟说:“我认为,如果他们试图提高儿童与教师的比例,那只会让整个行业彻底崩溃。”她补充道:“尤其是在婴儿室,目前四比一的比例已经很难维持了。如果他们试图提高这个比例,没人愿意在那间教室工作。”她还说:“即使在四比一的比例下,我们也需要行政人员和其他老师在一天的某些时段介入协助;如果比例进一步提高,没人愿意待在那儿。”她认为:“家长也不希望自己的孩子待在那种环境里。问题不仅仅是老师压力太大。”

"I think that if they were to try to raise the child to teacher ratio, that it would just completely collapse the industry," said Tricia Hulsether, a worker at Windy Willow Preschool in Minnesota. "It's already very difficult to have, especially in an infant room, four to one ratio. If they were to try and raise that, no one would want to work in that room." "Even at a four to one ratio, we have our administrative staff and our other teachers stepping in just to assist at certain times of the day, and if that was more, no one would want to be in there," she added. "I think the parents wouldn't want their child in there either. It wouldn't just be that the teachers are too stressed.

孩子们将会感到痛苦。”特朗普政府的提议将监管责任转移给各州,导致不同地区的班级规模、教育要求和背景调查存在巨大差异。一些州的师生比例要求与现行联邦指导方针相同,但超过一半的州并非如此。“今天,我们将Head Start项目归还到其初衷。我们正在削减不必要的官僚主义,加强营养和身体健康,信任父母和当地社区,并让Head Start项目惠及数十万更多儿童。这就是我们为下一代续写Head Start承诺的方式,”卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长罗伯特·F·肯尼迪 Jr.在宣布Head Start项目拟议变更时如此表示。

The children are going to be distressed." The Trump administration’s proposal shifts the responsibility of regulation onto the states, creating vastly different class sizes, education requirements and background checks depending on the area. Some states have the same staff-to-child ratio requirements as current federal guidance, but more than half do not. “Today, we are returning Head Start to those roots. We are removing unnecessary bureaucracy, strengthening nutrition and physical health, trusting parents and local communities, and opening Head Start to hundreds of thousands more children. That’s how we renew the promise of Head Start for the next generation,” Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Said when announcing the proposed changes to Head Start.

《国会山报》已联系HHS寻求置评。虽然特朗普政府宣称这些变更可能为学生增加20万个名额;但有人认为,放松监管并不能解决托儿服务提供者或父母面临的资金问题。“我们不会通过放松监管来摆脱托儿服务根本上的融资问题,”美国托儿意识组织(Child Care Aware of America)首席执行官苏珊·盖尔·佩里说。“因此,无论是州级监管还是联邦监管,托儿服务都是一个高度依赖人力的行业。父母负担不起提供安全、有爱心照护的实际成本,而服务提供者也真的负担不起支付他们吸引和留住优秀教师所需的工资。”

The Hill has reached out to HHS for comment. While the Trump administration touted the changes could add 200,000 more spots for students; some argue deregulation does not fix the money problem for childcare providers or parents. "We are not going to deregulate our way out of what is fundamentally a financing problem for childcare," said Susan Gale Perry, CEO of Child Care Aware of America. "So, whether it's state regulation or federal regulation, childcare is a people-intensive business. Parents can't afford what it actually costs to provide care, safe and nurturing care, and providers really can't afford to pay the wages that they need to attract and retain great teachers."

另一份全美幼儿教育协会(NAEYC)报告发现,托儿费用正在上升,且这并非由教育工作者薪酬上涨导致。报告指出,从2024年到2025年,支付教育工作者的费用上涨了4%,但责任和财产保险费用均上涨了超过20%。随着师生比例的增加,有人担心保险费用可能会进一步上升。

Another NAEYC report found childcare costs are rising and hasn’t been caused by increasing pay for educators. Providers say from 2024 to 2025, the cost of paying educators went up 4 percent, according to the report, but liability and property insurance costs both went up by more than 20 percent. With increased ratios of staff to children, some worry insurance costs could go up even more.

“托儿责任保险费用正以火箭般的速度上升,不幸的是,改变那些确保儿童安全、适当数量的儿童、适当数量的成年人、这些成年人接受过良好培训以理解儿童发展并知道如何实际监督儿童的因素,将导致更多儿童受伤,这意味着保险费用将进一步飙升,”宾夕法尼亚州First Up组织(支持宾夕法尼亚州托儿教育)政府与对外事务主管泰隆·斯科特说。

“Childcare liability insurance has been rising at a rocket rate, and unfortunately, a very predictable conclusion of changing things that keep children, an appropriate number of children, an appropriate number of adults, those adults being well trained in understanding child development and how to actually supervise children, when you change those things, you're going to have more children get hurt, which means insurance is going to skyrocket even more,” said Tyrone Scott, director of government and external affairs at First Up Pennsylvania, a group supporting child care education in Pennsylvania.

“您可能节省的成本最终会转嫁给父母,但现在您还让儿童受到了伤害。”他补充道。早期儿童教育工作者与特朗普政府在托儿服务提供者在不同政府体系中面临重复报告要求的负担问题上达成了一致。调查显示,60%的受访者表示他们必须向多个机构提交相同的信息;56%的人表示文书工作所花的时间超出了他们入职时的预期;50%的人表示他们在无偿时间里进行合规工作。

“The costs that you may have saved will be turned back on the parents, but now you have hurt children on top of it,” he added. Where early childhood educators and the Trump administration reach an agreement is on the burden of duplicated reporting requirements for childcare providers within different government systems. Sixty percent in the survey said they have to submit the same information to multiple agencies, 56 percent said the paperwork takes more time than they expected when they took the job and 50 percent perform compliance work on unpaid time.

但倡导者认为,解决托儿问题的重点应放在投资上,而不仅仅是监管。“我认为我们也在继续支持努力,真正重新构想和加强我们的体系,以便我们能够覆盖更多儿童和家庭,服务所有需要优质托儿服务的儿童和家庭,并且在我们服务更多儿童和家庭的同时,提高与之相关的支付标准,使教育工作者能够像专业人士一样获得报酬,并被认可为专业人士——无论他们是在托儿中心还是家庭托儿所工作。这需要大幅增加投资,”美国幼儿教育协会(NAEYC)首席政策与专业发展官员丹尼尔·海恩斯说。

But advocates argue the focus for solutions to child care need to be on investment, not solely regulation. “I think we are also continuing to support efforts to really reimagine and strengthen our systems so that we can reach more children and families, serve all children and families who need access to quality childcare, and ensure that as we're serving more children and families, that we're increasing payment rates that are associated with that, so that educators are able to be paid like the professionals they are, and recognized as professionals, whether they're working in a childcare center or a family childcare home. That requires significantly more investment,” said Daniel Hains, NAEYC’s chief policy and professional advancement officer.

阅读媒体原文 ↗