
2026年10月16日,在印度新德里,抗议者们在高防保安人员的看守下高喊口号,参加由“蟑螂人民党”(Cockroach Janta Party,简称CJP)组织的集会,要求印度选举委员会主席吉亚内什·库马尔(Gyanesh Kumar)辞职。——路透社53岁的卡姆塔·普拉萨德(Kamta Prasad)是因印度选民名单修订而被从选民名单中删除的1.3亿人之一。此次修订引发了大规模抗议活动,对纳伦德拉·莫迪(Narendra Modi)政府构成了重大挑战。
Protestors amid security personnels chant slogans as they take part in a flag rally by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) seeking the resignation of India's Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, in New Delhi, India, October 16, 2026. — Reuters Kamta Prasad has been shuttling between government offices in Delhi trying to prove he is not dead. The 53-year-old tailor is among 130 million names removed from India's electoral rolls under a voter roll revision that has sparked mass protests and posed the biggest challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has led to removals for reasons ranging from "logical discrepancies" to people being recorded as dead, leaving many such as Prasad struggling to get more than just their voting status restored.
根据印度选举委员会公布的选民名单草案,普拉萨德属于被错误标记为“已死亡”的选民之一。他每天仅靠250卢比(约合2.63美元)的工资维持全家人的生计,如今却不得不四处奔走,试图纠正这一错误。
He has had to forgo his daily wage of 250 rupees ($2.63) that supports his family of four to scurry around the city to reverse the error.
“当我得知这个消息时,我惊慌失措,”普拉萨德说,“根据选举委员会8月31日公布的名单,我有420万德里选民被从选民名单中删除。”他继续说道:“从那以后,我一直在四处证明自己还活着。”
"I panicked when I heard about it," said Prasad, who is among 4.2 million Delhi voters struck off the list, according to the draft rolls published by the poll body on August 31. "Since then I've been going everywhere to prove that I'm alive."
这些选民的删除行为引发了政治风波:反对党和青年团体在新德里及其他地区几乎每天都举行抗议活动,但遭到了警方的暴力镇压。反对者们指控选举委员会主席吉亚内什·库马尔操纵了这次选民名单的修订工作,以偏袒莫迪领导的印度人民党(Bharatiya Janata Party,简称BJP);不过,选举委员会及印度人民党都否认了这一指控。
Kamta Prasad, 53, a voter who is listed as "Kanta Prasad" and is declared dead in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) list published on August 1, 2026, cleans his glasses at his workstation, in New Delhi, India, October 19, 2026. — Reuters The deletions have triggered a political storm, with opposition parties and youth groups staging near-daily protests in New Delhi and elsewhere, which have been met with force by the police. They allege Election Commission chief Gyanesh Kumar manipulated the revision to benefit Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, a charge denied by both the commission and the BJP.

“没有人愿意听我们的诉求……”据非营利组织“人民关注”的志愿者拉金德拉·库马尔介绍,在修订后,普拉萨德所在选区约9000名选民中,约有2000人被剔除,被列为缺席、迁出、死亡或在其他地方登记。
'Nobody listens' According to Rajendra Kumar, a volunteer with non-profit Jan Sarokar, about 2,000 of the roughly 9,000 voters in Prasad's block were struck off after the revision, classified as absent, shifted, deceased or registered elsewhere.
普拉萨德是该选区唯一一名被宣布死亡的人,但当地媒体在全国范围内报道了几起类似案例。
Prasad is the only person in this block who has been declared dead but several similar cases have been reported by local media across the country.
选举委员会表示,正在剔除重复、死亡、迁出及其他不符合资格的选民,任何被错误排除的人都可以提出申索、提交支持文件,并在选民名单最终确定前提出上诉。
The Election Commission has said it was removing duplicate, deceased, shifted and otherwise ineligible voters and that anyone excluded in error can file claims, submit supporting documents and pursue appeals before the rolls are finalised.
然而,对于普拉萨德这样的选民来说,被排除会导致陷入官僚迷宫,视情况而定,他们可能需要提供生存证明、确立居住地、纠正所谓的差异或提交新文件。
For voters such as Prasad, however, exclusion leads to a bureaucratic maze, and depending on the circumstances they may have to provide proof of life, establish residency, correct alleged discrepancies or submit fresh documentation.
这包括反复前往选举办事处、在选举官员面前举行听证会以及多轮上诉,有些人花费数周或数月试图恢复自己的名字。
That involves repeated visits to election offices, hearings before electoral officials and multiple rounds of appeals, with some spending weeks or months trying to restore their names.
“我告诉他们,我参加了上一次州议会选举和大选,已经投票35年了,但没人听,”普拉萨德说。印度选举委员会未回应本报道的置评请求。
"I told them I voted in the last assembly and general elections and have been voting for 35 years, but nobody listens," Prasad said. India's Election Commission did not reply to a request for comment for this story.
作为一名新选民,在数周抗议之后,选举委员会下令在包括德里在内的一些州重新核查,普拉萨德说,官员向他保证他的名字将被恢复。
as a new voter Following weeks of protests, the Election Commission ordered fresh verification in some states, including Delhi, and Prasad said officials had assured him his name would be restored.

38岁的私立学校教师卡马尔·拉尔住在德里一座立交桥下的聚居地,与几十户其他家庭一起,但他被标记为“迁出”。
Kamal Lal, a 38-year-old private school teacher in Delhi, was marked as "shifted" even though he still lives in a settlement beneath a flyover with dozens of other families.
38岁的卡马尔·拉尔是一名教师,也是登记在册的选民。他称自己的名字被从选民名单中删除,并被列入特别密集修订名单里的“永久迁移”类别。2026年10月16日,他在印度新德里接受路透社采访时拍摄了照片。——路透社“我们一直在这个国家投票,如今却因为没有土地证明或水费账单而被除名,这实在令人失望,”他说。
Kamal Lal, 38, a teacher and voter who says his name was removed from the voter list and is placed in the Permanently Shifted category in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) list, poses for a photograph during Reuters interview in New Delhi, India, October 16, 2026. — Reuters "It is very disappointing that we have been voting in this country and now our names have been cut because we do not have land papers or a water bill," he said.

拉尔称,他于9月份首次得知自己被除名的消息,此后便多次联系选举官员、参加听证会并提交了多份恢复选民资格的申请。
Lal said he first learned of his exclusion in September and has since approached election officials, attended hearings and filed multiple reinstatement applications.
对于部分被除名的选民而言,官方提供的补救办法并未带来多少安慰:他们并未被恢复原有的选民登记资格,反而被要求以新选民的身份重新申请。对于经济条件较差的选民来说,担忧更为深切。
For some excluded voters, the remedy offered by officials has brought little comfort: rather than restoring their previous registrations, they were advised to apply afresh as new voters.
39岁的玛姆塔同样没有使用姓氏。2026年8月1日发布的特别密集修订名单中,她的名字也被从选民名单中删除并归入“永久迁移”类别。2026年10月15日,她在印度新德里的家中接受路透社采访时拍摄了照片。——路透社“如今当地选举官员要求我们以新选民的身份重新申请,可我的丈夫坚决反对,因为他此前多次参与过选举,”玛姆塔说道,“我担心如果名字无法重新列入名单,我可能就再也享受不到政府提供的粮食补贴及其他福利了。”
For poorer voters, fears run even deeper. Mamta, a voter whose name was removed from the voter list and put under the Permanently Shifted category in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) list published on August 1, 2026, poses for a photograph during a Reuters interview at her house in New Delhi, India, October 15, 2026. — Reuters "Now local election officials are asking us to as new voters, and my husband is strongly opposed to that because he has voted in the last few elections," said 39-year-old Mamta, who does not use a surname. "I am worried that if our names are not restored to the list, I could lose access to subsidised ration and other government welfare schemes."