
美国最大的银行正在努力防止人工智能技术可能引发的最糟糕后果。不过,Axios报道称,这些银行也在为灾难发生后的“后续情况”做准备。
America's largest banks are working to prevent AI worst-case scenarios. But they're also preparing for the "day after" a catastrophe, Axios has learned. Why it matters:
为何这很重要:美国的金融机构与顶尖的人工智能公司合作,共同制定应对灾难的预案。这一举措虽然谨慎,但却令人担忧——它反映了大型企业对潜在风险的深刻认识。
America's financial institutions have joined the largest AI companies in scenario-planning for disaster, a prudent but worrisome signal about the extent of the risk that major corporations see on the horizon. State of play:
当前形势: Axios指出,银行目前面临着由客户自行提供身份信息所引发的安全问题:这些人工智能系统在某些情况下会自行采取行动,而无需用户的明确指令。
Banks are experiencing unvetted AI agent activity primarily driven by customers providing credentials to agents, which in some cases appear to have taken actions independent of user prompts, Axios reported Wednesday.
这类行为与去年夏天针对初创公司 Hugging Face 的攻击事件有所不同——在那次攻击中,大量人工智能程序入侵了该公司的平台,引发了整个行业的网络安全危机。
• The activity is distinct from the rogue behavior involved in a summer attack on a startup called Hugging Face, where an AI agent swarm hacked a platform in an episode that kicked off an industry security crisis.
银行更担心的是:用户允许这些人工智能系统访问自己的账户并自行操作所带来的连锁反应和风险,因为这些系统可能会做出用户并未授权的举动。
• Instead, banks fear the ripple effects and risks that extend from users allowing agents to to their accounts and take action, especially since agents could take steps users haven't sanctioned.
由于对前沿人工智能技术的担忧,银行纷纷加大了预防措施的投资,并为最坏的情况做好了准备。
• Concerns about frontier AI systems, not AI agents, have led banks to invest in prevention and to plan for the worst.
进一步分析: Axios 的这份报告发布之际,人们对日益严重的网络安全危机愈发担忧。
Zoom in: The Axios report came amid growing concerns about a burgeoning cybersecurity crisis.
Salesforce 的首席执行官 Marc Benioff 在社交媒体上发布了“红色警报”,引用了 Anthropic 公司一名安全专家的话:“尽管过去四天的情况已经很糟糕了,但在情况好转之前,情况还会变得更糟。”
• Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff posted "code red" on X, quoting an Anthropic security employee who said "as bad as things have gotten in the past 4 days, they are going to get a lot worse before they get better."
这位专家指的是安全研究人员在一种用于运行数百万网站的编程语言中发现了重大安全漏洞——这是迄今为止与人工智能技术相关的重要网络安全发现之一。
• The Anthropic employee was referring to security researchers finding major vulnerabilities in a programming language used to run millions of websites, marking one of the most consequential cybersecurity discoveries yet made with AI.
Axios 关于银行使用人工智能系统的报道引发了社会各界的关注,包括参议员 Bernie Sanders、佛罗里达州州长 Ron DeSantis 以及参议员 Mark Warner 等人,他们都呼吁对相关技术进行监管。
• The Axios report on banks, which referred to agentic AI, not frontier AI systems, sparked calls for regulation from across the political spectrum, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Mark Warner.
- 前白宫人工智能事务主管戴维·萨克斯表示,银行应支持由用户主导的智能体,允许用户“授予、限制和撤销访问权限”,并将只读权限作为“过渡步骤”。
• Former White House AI czar David Sacks said banks should support user-directed agents that allow users to "grant, limit, and revoke access," with read-only as an "interim step."
- 萨克斯表示,将“用户授权的智能体行为与网络攻击混为一谈是不负责任的”。
• Sacks said conflating "user-authorized agentic behavior and cyberattacks is irresponsible."
背景回顾:各大银行曾参与Anthropic旗下Mythos的早期测试,这是该人工智能实验室网络能力最强的模型。
Flashback: The major banks were part of early testing of Anthropic's Mythos, the most cyber capable models from the AI lab.
- 这是人工智能实验室与大型银行共同努力的一部分,目的是利用这项技术更好地了解和防范网络攻击或其他风险。
• That was part of an effort from AI labs and major banks to use this technology to better understand and prepare for cyberattacks or other risks.
- 此后,银行一直在制定相关计划,不仅是为了避免人工智能相关问题,也是为了在遭遇大规模攻击时保护账户、安抚客户并维持运营。
• Since then, banks have worked on plans not just to avoid AI related issues, but also how to protect accounts, reassure customers and keep operations running in case a large-scale attack hits.
现实核查:这不仅符合标准做法,对于必须向政府、股东和客户负责的关键行业来说,更是必需之举。
Reality check: This is not just standard, it's required for critical industries that have to answer to the government, shareholders and customers.
- 情景规划是包括金融行业在内的关键基础设施提供商的必备要求。不做规划就属于失职。
• Scenario planning is a requirement for critical infrastructure providers, including in the financial sector. Avoiding it would be malpractice.
- 风险最高的情景都涉及恐惧:本月早些时候在芝加哥发表讲话时,摩根大通首席执行官杰米·戴蒙就网络攻击的可能性、以及人工智能智能体可能采取用户未批准的操作发出了警告。
• The highest-risk scenarios involve fear: Speaking in Chicago earlier this month, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warned about the potential for cyberattacks or the possibility AI agents could take steps of which users do not approve.
- “你假设它们会代表你正确行事,但它们可能不会,”戴蒙说。他表示,唯一的应对之道是保持警惕,并警告说阻止人工智能是不可能的。“你阻止不了它。你只能,比如说,拼命把它管好。”
• "You're assuming they're going to act properly on your behalf and they may not," Dimon said. The only answer is vigilance, he said, warning that stopping AI wouldn't be possible. "You can't stop it. You just have to, like, manage the hell out of it."
- 上个月,一位经济学家提出了这样一种可能性:智能体将用户的家庭现金转入收益更高的账户,从而引发银行挤兑。
• One economist last month floated the possibility of a bank run driven by agents moving the household cash of their users into higher-yield accounts.
言外之意:银行希望客户知道,它们尚未发现任何失控智能体的活动,也没有证据表明有黑客攻击影响了客户资金或账户。
Between the lines: Banks want customers to know they have not seen any rogue agent activity or evidence of a hack affecting customer funds or accounts.
- 银行强烈建议用户不要向代理提供密码,尤其是目前已经存在或正在开发的服务可以让客户获得只读访问权限。初创公司Plaid就是这样一个平台,它可以获取余额和交易历史等功能。
• Banks strongly advise users not to provide their passwords to agents, especially since services exist or are being developed that can allow customers read-only access. The startup Plaid is one such platform that can pull balances and transaction history, among other functions.
- 摩根大通的一位发言人告诉Axios:“在任何情况下,客户都不应将密码分享给任何人或任何事物。就是这样。”“存在安全的开放银行平台,无需交出账户钥匙。客户是保护账户的第一道防线。”
• "Under no circumstance should customers share passwords with any person or thing. Period," a JPMorgan spokesperson told Axios. "There exist secure open banking platforms that don't involve handing over the keys to your account.
- 摩根大通已采取措施阻止代理访问,与其他银行一样,尽管它正在探索安全的方式,让客户与他们选择的服务连接。
Customers are the first line of defense in protecting their accounts." • JPMorgan has taken steps to block agent access, along with other banks, although it is exploring secure ways to allow customers to connect with the services they choose.
引人关注之处: AI公司预计会出现政治反弹。银行正在为潜在的运营中断做准备。
The intrigue: AI companies are anticipating a political backlash. Banks are preparing for potential operational disruptions.
- 联邦政府针对同时涉及两者的危机的规划程度仍不清楚。
• The extent of federal planning for a crisis spanning both remains unclear.
底线: AI进步的速度让华尔街和硅谷在为最坏情况做准备,而华盛顿则在努力减轻网络风险,并指望自愿的安全承诺。
The bottom line: The pace of AI advances has Wall Street and Silicon Valley preparing for worst-case scenarios while Washington is working to mitigate cyber risks and counting on voluntary safety pledges.