毫不奇怪，唐纳德·特朗普总统认为石油天然气行业比降低汽油价格更重要：因为他是那个大发横财的人。
It’s no surprise that President Donald Trump thinks that the oil and gas business is more important than lowering gas prices: He’s the one making a fortune.
国会联合经济委员会民主党人周一发布的一份新报告显示，特朗普在石油天然气领域的个人持仓价值在过去10个月里可能增长了43%。
A new report published Monday by the Democrats on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee revealed that the value of Trump’s personal holdings in oil and gas may have increased by 43 percent in the last 10 months alone.
目前，总统的石油天然气持仓价值在2250万美元至8160万美元之间。到2025年底，这些持仓价值在1260万美元至4600万美元之间。
The president’s oil and gas holdings are currently worth between $22.5 million and $81.6 million. At the end of 2025, they were worth between $12.6 million and $46 million.
这份报告发布之际，距离总统开始吹嘘伤害美国人的能源价格正让他和他的亿万富翁朋友们发大财仅过去不久。
The report came out shortly after the president started bragging about how the energy prices hurting Americans are making him and his billionaire buddies rich.
“虽然油价暂时很高，但只要那场战争一结束，油价将在短时间内大幅下跌——因为石油太多了，”他在周六于佐治亚州举行的集会上对人群说道，指的是他在伊朗的战争。
“And while oil prices are temporarily high, and will be falling dramatically in a short period of time as soon as that war is over—because there’s so much oil,” he said to the crowd at a rally in Georgia on Saturday, referring to his war in Iran.
“美国石油天然气行业正在赚取数千亿美元……我们的国家因中东发生的事情正在赚取数千亿美元……数万亿美元。”与此同时，美国人在特朗普执政下支付的汽油平均价格已正式超过拜登政府时期的平均价格。特朗普曾反复承诺结束他为期七个月的“六周战争”，并将汽油价格降至每加仑2美元以下。但当他公开承认让美国人受苦符合他的经济利益时，他有什么理由结束战争、降低价格呢？在特朗普希望选民假装他的名字在选票上的中期选举前夕，这向美国人传递了什么样的信号？
“The United States oil and gas business is making hundreds of billions of dollars.… Our country is making hundreds of billions of dollars ’cause of what’s happened in the Middle East … trillions of dollars.”Meanwhile, the average price Americans are paying for gasoline under Trump has officially surpassed the average price during the Biden administration. Trump has repeatedly pledged to end his seven-month “six-week war” with Iran and lower gasoline prices to below $2 per gallon. But what reason does he have to end the war and lower prices when he’s openly admitting it’s in his financial interest to let Americans suffer? And what kind of message does this send to Americans ahead of the midterm elections, where Trump wants voters to pretend his name is on the ballot?
埃隆·马斯克承认减慢了乌克兰的“星链”连接速度，声称这个饱受战火蹂躏的国家理亏，因为它在对俄战争中使用了该公司的服务。
Elon Musk fessed to slowing down Ukraine’s Starlink connection, claiming that the war-torn country was in the wrong because it was using the company’s services in its war against Russia.
马斯克周六在X平台发帖称：“使用星链这一民用商业服务进行进攻性无人机打击以杀人，从未被允许，也不应被允许。乌克兰军方违反星链服务条款，将其用于进攻性无人机打击以杀人。该漏洞已于上周关闭。”
“Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be,” Musk wrote in an X post Saturday. “Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.”
马斯克此前曾表示，他不对上周乌克兰星链卫星互联网服务中断负责，当时俄罗斯导弹正轰炸基辅。相反，马斯克将中断归咎于美国军方和唐纳德·特朗普近期的决定。
Musk had previously suggested that he was not responsible for the drop in Starlink’s satellite-supplied internet service over Ukraine last week, which occurred as Russian missiles barraged Kyiv. Instead, Musk blamed the lapse on the recent decisions of the U.S. military and Donald Trump.
特朗普随即拒绝承担责任。“我不知道是谁干的，但我没有参与，”特朗普周三离开白宫时对记者说。据《华尔街日报》报道，特朗普据称当天致电马斯克，要求其恢复该地区服务。
Trump refused to take the blame shortly afterward. “I don’t know who did it, but I was not involved,” Trump told reporters as he departed the White House on Wednesday. Trump reportedly called Musk to demand he return service to the region that same day, according to The Wall Street Journal.
然而，尽管马斯克重申立场，乌克兰上周早些时候的行动绝非进攻性。俄罗斯弹道导弹击中两座向基辅供热供电的工厂，并损毁首都一栋居民楼。乌克兰国家紧急服务局在Telegram声明中称，袭击造成至少9人死亡。
Yet despite Musk’s renewed position, Ukraine’s actions early last week were anything but offensive. Russian ballistic missiles slammed two plants supplying heat and electricity to Kyiv and damaged a residential building in the capital city. At least nine people died in the attacks, Ukraine’s State Emergency Services shared in a Telegram statement.
乌克兰官员暗示，若能获得适当情报，这些袭击本可避免——但当时只有无线电静默。多位知情人士向CBS新闻透露，美国官员声称其防御系统因“恶劣天气”未能探测到导弹，但基辅方面不信这一借口。
Ukrainian officials suggested that the strikes could have been prevented if they received the proper intelligence—but there was only radio silence. Multiple sources familiar with the matter told CBS News that U.S. officials claimed their defense systems had failed to detect the missiles because of “bad weather,” but Kyiv did not buy the excuse.
情报失误发生在特朗普与俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京达成一项引人注目的协议、从莫斯科购买柴油几天之后，这实际上为俄罗斯提供了一条经济生命线，使其能够继续战争。乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基公开批评该安排，引发了一场持续数日的骚扰行动，特朗普政府致电基辅和其他欧洲首都，威胁切断军事情报共享和武器交付，除非乌克兰停止袭击俄罗斯炼油厂。
The intelligence blunder occurred days after Trump brokered an eyebrow-raising deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin to buy diesel from Moscow, effectively offering the country an economic lifeline that would allow Russia to continue the war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was publicly critical of the arrangement, sparking a multiday harassment campaign in which the Trump administration called Kyiv and other European capitals, threatening to cut off military intelligence sharing and weapons deliveries unless Ukraine stopped attacking Russian oil refineries.
白宫对星链的影响力似乎比总统所言更大。六名前美国高级官员周五告诉路透社，拜登和特朗普政府此前均曾要求SpaceX调整其星链互联网在不同国家的可用性，包括乌克兰和中东地区。
The White House’s influence over Starlink appears to be greater than the president lets on. Six former senior U.S. officials told Reuters Friday that both the Biden and Trump administrations had previously asked SpaceX to adjust its Starlink internet availability in different countries, including Ukraine and areas of the Middle East.
特朗普政府再次因禁止CNN、《政治报》（Politico）和MS NOW进入白宫记者团而被起诉。
The Trump administration has once again been sued for banning CNN, Politico, and MS NOW from the White House Press pool.
虽然这三家新闻机构在针对政府的初步禁令诉讼中已获胜，但这起于周一提起的最新诉讼——由哥伦比亚大学奈特第一修正案研究所和耶鲁法学院自由与信息获取诊所提起——也是为美国公众的利益而战。
While the three newsrooms were already victorious in their preliminary injunction against the administration, this recent lawsuit—filed on Monday by Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute and Yale Law School’s Freedom & Information Access Clinic—advocates for the American public, as well.
该诉讼代表六名原告提起，他们依赖持有白宫采访证的记者来完成自己的工作：耶鲁大学教授肯尼斯·罗斯和贝弗利·盖奇、《法律战》（Lawfare）主编本杰明·维特斯、《新闻观察》（Press Watch）编辑丹尼尔·弗鲁姆金、学生记者伊森·杨，以及纽约市高中教师彼得·施密特-诺瓦拉。
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of six plaintiffs who rely on credentialed White House reporters to do their own jobs: Yale professors Kenneth Roth and Beverly Gage, Lawfare editor in chief Benjamin Wittes, Press Watch editor Daniel Froomkin, student journalist Ethan Young, and New York City high school teacher Peter Schmidt-Nowara.
“该政策违反了第一修正案。白宫长期以来为某些新闻界成员维护了一个受保护的论坛，以便其从事第一修正案保护的新闻采集和报道活动，”诉状写道。“该政策之所以违宪，是因为它以基于观点且不合理的标准为条件，限制进入和参与白宫新闻论坛。”诉状称：“最终的受害者……是民主公众。”该诉状是在纽约提起的。
“The Policy violates the First Amendment. The White House has long maintained a protected forum for certain members of the press to engage in the First Amendment activities of newsgathering and reporting,” the lawsuit reads. “The Policy is unconstitutional because it conditions access and participation in the White House Press Forum on criteria that are viewpoint based and unreasonable.”“The ultimate injury here … is to the democratic public,” says the lawsuit, which was filed in New York.
“白宫不能通过惩罚批评性报道来决定美国人接收什么信息，”奈特第一修正案研究所副诉讼主任凯蒂·法洛说。“当白宫因记者的报道将其驱逐，并威胁驱逐其他记者时，受损的不仅是新闻界——公众失去了获取独立报道的渠道，得到的更接近政府宣传。”这场风波始于9月18日，当时特朗普因对其政府的负面报道，戏剧性地拒绝CNN、MSNBC和《政治报》进入白宫。
“The White House cannot decide what information Americans receive by punishing critical reporting,” said Knight First Amendment Institute deputy litigation director Katie Fallow. “When the White House expels reporters because of their coverage and threatens others with expulsion, it isn’t just the press that suffers—the public loses access to independent reporting and gets something closer to government propaganda.”This debacle first began on September 18, when Trump dramatically denied CNN, MS NOW, and Politico access to the White House due to unfavorable coverage of his administration.
此后，他们获得了一项临时禁令，允许他们返回记者团——但特朗普无视该禁令，继续拒绝CNN登乘其“空军一号”专机。只有时间能告诉我们特朗普将如何应对这最新的法律行动。_本故事已更新。_白宫其他消息：挪威官员感到目瞪口呆，因为特朗普总统建议禁止挪威人入境美国，并在周日密歇根州的一场集会上称挪威为“屎坑国家”。
Since then, they have been granted a temporary injunction allowing them to return to the press pool—but Trump has defied them, continuing to deny CNN access to his Air Force One jet. Only time will tell how Trump reacts to this most recent legal action against him. This story has been updated. Elsewhere in the White House: Norwegian officials are dumbfounded after President Trump suggested banning Norwegians from the U.S., calling Norway a “shithouse country” during a Michigan rally on Sunday.
特朗普在密歇根州休伦港对观众抱怨诺贝尔和平奖被一个“从未有人听说过的女人”获得时发表了上述言论。“我说‘那我呢？他们会颁两个吗？’想想看，我解决了问题，所以我对挪威谈不上喜爱。坦白说，挪威真烂。挪威实际上已经变成了一个屎坑国家，”特朗普在笑声中说道。
Trump made the comments while complaining to the audience in Port Huron, Michigan, that the Nobel Peace Prize was won by a “woman nobody had ever heard of.”“I said ‘What about me? Do they do two of them?’ Think of it, I settled, so I’m not in love with Norway. Frankly, Norway sucks. Norway has become a shithouse country, actually,” Trump said to laughter.
“丹麦？拿走。瑞典。挪威，我想不行，因为我没拿到诺贝尔奖，”特朗普接着说。“我不想要任何来自挪威的人，我不想和挪威有任何瓜葛。”挪威官员们直摇头。
“Denmark? Take ’em. Sweden. Norway, I don’t think so because I didn’t get the Nobel Prize,” Trump continued. “I don’t want anybody from Norway, I don’t want anything to do with Norway.”Norwegian officials are shaking their heads.
“他非常清楚诺贝尔委员会是独立的，”挪威外交大臣埃斯彭·巴特·艾德周一对该国公共广播机构 NRK 表示。“我们已经提醒过他这一点，以防有人存疑，这依然是事实。”
“He knows very well that the Nobel committee is independent,” Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said to NRK, the country’s public broadcaster, on Monday. “We have reminded him of that, in case anyone is wondering, and that is still the case.”
特朗普如此恼火颇具讽刺意味，毕竟他在 1 月曾表示其实并不在意。当时他依然猛烈抨击挪威，声称：“如果有人认为挪威不控制诺贝尔奖，那他们就是在开玩笑。他们有一个委员会，但它是由挪威控制的，我不在乎挪威怎么说。”更有趣的是，早在他的第一个任期，特朗普据报道曾在椭圆形办公室的一次会议上抱怨，不想接受来自海地和非洲国家等“屎坑国家”的移民，反而建议美国应接纳更多来自挪威等国家的人，特别点名了挪威。
It’s funny that Trump is so annoyed, considering that he said in January that he actually doesn’t care. He still railed against Norway at the time, claiming, “If anybody thinks that Norway doesn’t control the Nobel Prize, they are just kidding. They have a board, but it’s controlled by Norway, and I don’t care what Norway says.”Even funnier is the fact that way back in his first term, Trump reportedly complained in an Oval Office meeting about accepting immigrants from “shithole countries” like Haiti and places in Africa, and instead suggested the U.S. should take in more people from countries like Norway, mentioning that country in particular.
他在去年 12 月的一场集会上也说过类似的话。但对特朗普而言，被一个奖项冷遇，足以覆盖他对移民的种族主义偏好。
He said similar words at a rally last December. To Trump, though, being snubbed for an award is enough to override his racist preferences for immigrants.
一名法官周一裁定，莫琳·科米被错误解除前纽约南区助理美国检察官职务，责令司法部恢复其职位并补发工资。
A judge ruled Monday that Maurene Comey was wrongfully terminated from her position as the former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, ordering the Justice Department to reinstate her with back pay.
科米是前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的女儿，于 2025 年 7 月被解职。司法部当时未提供解职理由，仅以唐纳德·特朗普拥有解职权力为唯一理由。
Comey, the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, was fired in July 2025. The DOJ did not provide a rationale for her ouster at the time, simply citing Donald Trump’s authority to do so as the sole justification.
在一起联邦诉讼中，科米主张，她的解职是总统针对其父亲的政治报复行动的一部分。其父亲曾在特朗普首个任期内，就联邦调查局对2016年大选俄罗斯干预调查一事，在国会作证。
In a federal lawsuit, Comey argued that her firing was part of the president’s political retribution campaign against her father, who testified before Congress during Trump’s first term regarding the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
在一份长达55页的意见书中，美国地区法官杰西·M·弗尔曼认定，科米的解职不仅毫无根据，而且属于违法，因为它从根本上违反了1978年《文官制度改革法案》。
In a 55-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman declared that Comey’s termination was not only unfounded, but it was also illegal as it fundamentally violated the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.
政府的另一项抗辩理由引用宪法第二条，称国会无权规定助理美国检察官的免职，这一理由同样站不住脚，因为它“与近两个世纪的最高法院判例背道而驰”，弗尔曼写道。
The government’s other defense, which cited Article 2 of the Constitution barring Congress from regulating the removal of assistant U.S. attorneys, was similarly fraught, as it “flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent,” according to Furman.
“事实上，采纳被告的论点将动摇这个国家宪法体制所确立的微妙平衡，”弗尔曼写道。
“Indeed, to accept Defendants’ argument would be to unsettle the very equilibrium established by this Nation’s constitutional system,” Furman wrote.
在被解职前，科米参与了多起备受关注的案件，包括对音乐人肖恩·“迪迪”·库姆斯和儿童性贩运者杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的起诉。预计她将获得从被解职之日起至2025年12月（她当时在私人执业机构获得新工作）期间的拖欠工资。
Comey was involved in several high-profile cases prior to her firing, including prosecutions against musician Sean Combs (also known as P. Diddy) and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. She is expected to receive back pay dating from the time she was fired to December 2025, when she obtained a new job in private practice.
特朗普一直公开表达对詹姆斯·科米的鄙视。总统在其首个任期中，正值“通俄门”调查期间解除了科米的职务，提前终止了局长为期10年的任期。这一决定引发了由科米前任、特别检察官罗伯特·穆勒领导的后续调查，穆勒认定俄罗斯对2016年大选的影响“广泛且系统性”，并发现了大量（虽不可起诉）证据，表明特朗普通过解职科米构成了妨碍司法公正。
Trump has been very public about his contempt for James Comey. The president fired Comey during his first term in the midst of the Trump-Russia probe, prematurely ending the director’s 10-year term. His decision to do so prompted a follow-up investigation by Comey’s predecessor, special counsel Robert Mueller, who determined that Russian influence in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic” and found substantial (if non-prosecutable) evidence that Trump had obstructed justice by firing Comey.
4月，北卡罗来纳州东区联邦大陪审团以两项重罪指控起诉了科米，罪名与这位前联邦调查局局长在Instagram上分享的一张海边照片有关，照片中贝壳拼出了“86 47”的字样。“86”是餐饮业常用语，意指某菜品已从菜单上划去。
In April, a grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina indicted Comey on two felony charges relating to a seaside photo the former FBI director shared on Instagram that depicted seashells in an arrangement reading: “86 47.”Eighty-six is a popular phrase used in the restaurant industry to signify that an item has been crossed off the menu.
然而，根据科米的起诉书，司声称，任何“熟悉相关情况”的人都会将该信息解读为“一种严重表达伤害总统意图的言论”。
Yet the Department of Justice claimed that the message would be interpreted by any person “familiar with the circumstances” as a “serious expression of an intent to do harm to the president,” according to Comey’s indictment.
政府针对老科米的案件最终能否成立，仍有待观察。不过，近期曝光的特朗普亲自介入初步调查的细节，可能会让该诉讼陷入困境。
Whether or not the government’s case against the elder Comey will pan out remains to be seen. However, recent revelations regarding Trump’s personal involvement in the initial investigation could unravel the suit.