
在过去十年里,每当选票上出现唐纳德·特朗普的名字,安德鲁·莱瓦都会在旁边的方框里打勾。这位39岁的亚利桑那州百叶窗安装工相信,这位敢说狠话、愿意向华盛顿发起挑战的商人,会让像他这样的打工仔受益。莱瓦投下选票,是为了迎来特朗普屡次承诺的经济“黄金时代”。他设想汽油价格会降到每加仑2美元,政府开支会被削减,富人和权贵的影响力会被降到最低,普通人终于能有话语权,美国永远优先。
Over the past decade, Andrew Leyva shaded the space next to Donald Trump’s name each time it appeared on his ballot, trusting that a tough-talking businessman willing to challenge Washington would benefit working guys like him. Leyva, a 39-year-old who installs blinds in Arizona, voted to usher in the economic “golden age” that Trump so often promised. Leyva envisioned gas that cost $2 a gallon. Government spending would be cut. The influence of the wealthy and well-connected would be minimized. Regular people would finally get their say, and America would always come first.
特朗普第二次当选后,莱瓦没花多长时间就意识到自己被骗了。他说,首先,特朗普似乎阻挠公布爱泼斯坦档案,而当部分档案最终公开时,并未达到“让美国再次伟大”圈子此前的炒作高度。接着,总统做了一件他曾说不会做的事:发动战争。如今,莱瓦在汽油上的花费比去年几乎翻了一番——有时每周要花300美元。我在斯科茨代尔一家家居建材店外遇到了他,那里的选民将决定全美极具竞争力的一个国会选区席位。
It didn’t take long after Trump’s second win for Leyva to realize that he had been duped. First, he said, Trump seemed to obstruct the release of the Epstein files, which didn’t live up to the MAGA-sphere hype when some of them were finally made public. Then the president did something he had said he wasn’t going to do: start a war. Leyva now spends nearly twice as much on gas as he did last year—sometimes it costs him $300 a week. I ran into him outside a home-improvement store in Scottsdale, where voters will decide one of the nation’s competitive congressional races.
我问他是否打算去投票。“绝不。我觉得没意义,”他一边把百叶窗装进他那辆光鲜亮丽的丰田皮卡,一边告诉我。莱瓦说,特朗普本该与众不同,结果发现他跟其他政客一样烂。莱瓦认为自己这辈子都不会再去投票了。
I asked whether he was planning to vote. “Hell no. I don’t think it matters,” he told me as he loaded blinds into his gleaming Toyota pickup. Trump was supposed to be different, Leyva said, but it turns out that he’s just as bad as every other politician. Leyva doesn’t think that he’ll ever vote again.
我已经习惯了这种反应,因为过去一年里,许多人都向我表达了对美国政治体制的深深不信。他们对主要政党和投票程序毫无信心,并认为某种形式的“操纵”早已存在。许多人告诉我,他们的选票不会有任何作用,那么何必费心去投票呢?对一些人来说,特朗普是他们最后的希望。他们通常不投票,但破例为他投了票。当他未能兑现承诺时,他们对投票能解决问题的任何期待都随之破灭。
I’d grown accustomed to this sort of response, given the many people who have told me over the past year about their deep distrust of America’s political system. They have no confidence in major parties or the voting process, and they believe that some sort of fix is already in. Their votes won’t make a difference, many told me, so why bother casting a ballot? For some, Trump was their last hope. They hadn’t typically voted, but they made an exception in his case. When he failed to live up to his promises, any expectation that voting could solve their problems evaporated.
特朗普时代带来了一个悖论:即使美国人表示觉得政治比以往任何时候都更有毒,参与政治的人却更多了;2020年大选创下历史上投票人数最多的纪录,投出的选票超过1.58亿张。共和党的不投票者因特朗普而被激发,反对他的选民也首次参与政治。但中期选举的核心问题之一,是美国人是否会维持这种参与程度。像莱瓦这样决定不参加今天选举的人,可能有助于决定国会的权力平衡。
The Trump era has brought with it a paradox: Even as Americans say that they find politics to be more toxic than ever, more of them are participating; the 2020 election had the most voters in history, and more than 158 million ballots were cast. Republican nonvoters have been galvanized by Trump, and voters who oppose him have engaged with politics for the first time. But one of the central questions of the midterms is whether Americans will continue this level of involvement. Those who, like Leyva, decide to sit out today’s election could help determine the balance of power in Congress.
在势均力敌的竞选中,不露面的人和露面的人同样重要:即使投票率出现微小变化,也能决定胜负,尤其是在胶着的竞选和摇摆州。政党、候选人和外部团体花了数月时间试图激励人们现身投票。说服一个不情愿的选民投出选票,比改变一个坚定支持某党的忠诚选民的想法要容易。但在这场由飙升的汽油和食品杂货价格引发的愤怒所定义的选举中,这可能很难做到——特别是对于寻求激励那些为特朗普投票、如今却后悔当初竟去投票的共和党竞选团队而言。
In close contests, the people who don’t show up matter as much as the people who do: Even small shifts in turnout can determine winners and losers, especially in tight races and swing states. Parties, candidates, and outside groups have spent months trying to motivate people to show up. It can be easier to persuade a reluctant voter to cast a ballot than it is to change the mind of a consistent one who is committed to a party. But in an election defined by anger over soaring gas and grocery prices, this could prove difficult—particularly for GOP campaigns seeking to motivate people who turned out for Trump and now regret showing up at all.
这种严峻的氛围让共和党人陷入了防守战,不仅要在摇摆选区苦苦支撑,甚至连两年前还是绝对优势地盘的地方也要拼命防守。不投票者和偶尔投票者对两党的前景都至关重要。但整整一年,我采访的美国人都表示,他们不再看到投票的意义。一些人要求匿名才肯坦诚相告,说不想让雇主或家人看到他们的真实想法。
The grim mood has left Republicans battling to defend themselves, not just in swing seats but also in what was overwhelmingly friendly territory two years ago. Nonvoters and occasional voters are vital to the prospects of both parties. But all year, I have spoken with Americans who said that they no longer see the point. Some requested anonymity to talk candidly, saying they didn’t want employers or family members to read about their true feelings.
一对正费劲把两个闹腾的幼儿塞进汽车安全座椅的年轻共和党夫妇告诉我,他们在2024年投了特朗普的票,指望他能让他们在亚利桑那州更容易买得起房。如今房价遥不可及,持续高企的利率让借贷成本太高。他们要搬到得克萨斯州的埃尔帕索,丈夫在那里找到了一份警察的工作。他们不打算投票,因为忙着准备搬家,实在抽不开身。
One young Republican couple who were wrestling two fussy toddlers into their car seats told me that they cast their ballots for Trump in 2024, hoping he would make it easier for them to buy a home in Arizona. Now home prices are out of reach, and consistently high interest rates have made borrowing too expensive. They’re moving to El Paso, Texas, where the husband has accepted a job on the police force. They aren’t voting, because they’re too busy getting ready for the move.
这个问题并不只困扰共和党人。一些在2024年投给民主党候选人的选民也不愿再付出努力。一位支持卡玛拉·哈里斯的40岁女性告诉我,她现在怀疑自己在政治进程中的位置。两党都知道她参加了上一次选举,正拼命敲她的门,寻求她再次投票。她不想跟他们交谈,因为他们说什么都无法说服她去投票:“我看起来挺年轻,”她说,“所以我跟他们说我父母不在家。”
The problem doesn’t afflict just Republicans. Some voters who cast ballots for Democrats in 2024 are also unwilling to make the effort again. A 40-year-old woman who supported Kamala Harris told me that she now doubts her place in the political process. The parties know that she took part in the previous election, and they’re banging on her door, seeking an encore. She doesn’t want to talk with them, because nothing they could say would persuade her to vote: “I look pretty young,” she said, “so I tell them my parents aren’t home.”
她和我交谈的其他人说,他们因特朗普及其政府不断引发的争议而精疲力竭,已不再关注。一些人说,他们现在刻意避开关于总统的新闻报道。当他们意外看到相关内容时,不知该信谁,便转向更娱乐的内容,以免感到焦虑或不堪重负。我交谈的这些人无一认为总统、联邦政府或任何一个政党在改善他们的生活。许多人说,他们只信任能在社区里看到的官员,如市议会成员和警察。
She and others I spoke with said that they’re so burned out by the constant controversies involving Trump and his administration that they’ve stopped paying attention. Some said they now go out of their way to avoid news coverage about the president. When they accidentally stumble on it, they’re unsure whom to believe and move on to more entertaining content to avoid growing anxious or overwhelmed. None of the people I talked with believed that the president, the federal government, or either political party were improving their lives. Many said that they trust only the officials they can see in their communities, such as city-council members and police.
对选举制度缺乏信心也有助于解释缺乏动力的原因。特朗普执着于虚假声称2020年大选被窃取,这损害了人们对选票将被准确计数的信心。我交谈的许多人重复了他那些未经证实的说法,称选举设备篡改选票、外国阴谋破坏美国选民的意愿。一名男子告诉我,他认为投票不值得为了找到证明公民身份的文件而费周折——特朗普想强制要求这一点,但目前投票尚不需要。
A lack of confidence in the electoral system also helps explain the lack of motivation. Trump’s obsession with falsely claiming that the 2020 election was stolen from him has damaged faith that votes will be accurately tallied. Many people I talked with repeated his unproven claims about election equipment flipping votes and foreign conspiracies undermining the will of the American voter. One man told me he didn’t think voting was worth the hassle of tracking down documents that prove his citizenship—something Trump wants to make mandatory but that is not yet required to cast a ballot.
“当没人倾听、政治承诺注定被违背时,付出努力毫无意义,”这些选民说。“我们的美国,”莱瓦说,“一直在辜负我们。” 罗纳德上个月下班后正走进凤凰城的一家健身房,他并不真正认同某个政党。他在财政上保守、在社会上开明,既投过民主党也投过共和党。他不喜欢卡玛拉·哈里斯,但在2024年还是给她投了票。
Making an effort is pointless when no one is listening and political promises are made to be broken, these voters said. “Our United States,” Leyva said, “has just been failing us.”Ronald, who was heading into a Phoenix gym after work last month, doesn’t really identify with a political party. He’s fiscally conservative and socially liberal and has voted for both Democrats and Republicans. He didn’t like Kamala Harris in 2024 but cast a ballot for her anyway.
罗纳德不愿透露全名,因为他不想让亲友知晓自己真实的政治立场。他对膨胀的国家债务感到震惊,担心金融危机迫在眉睫。他告诉我,他厌倦了那些似乎只顾相互攻讦、却置实际议题于不顾的候选人。他无法摆脱竞选广告的轰炸,广告指责候选人包庇性侵犯者。
Ronald, who didn’t want his full name used, because he doesn’t want his friends and family to know his true political feelings, is appalled by the ballooning national debt and worries that a financial crisis is on the horizon. He told me that he’s tired of candidates who seem consumed with tearing each other down at the expense of actual issues. He can’t escape campaign s accusing candidates of protecting sexual predators.
正说着,罗纳德把手捏成一个圈举到嘴边,假装那是麦克风。“这家伙他妈的就爱恋童癖!”他大喊一声,模仿着亚利桑那州铺天盖地播放的政治广告,广告里州长候选人互相指责对方在儿童虐待问题上手软。
As he was telling me this, Ronald formed his hand into a circle and held it up to his mouth, pretending it was a microphone. “This guy fucking loves pedophiles!” he yelled, mocking political ads playing nonstop across Arizona, where candidates for governor are accusing each another of being soft on child abuse.
罗纳德过去常规投票。但广告及其“对政治的戏剧化处理”是他决定今年不再费心投票的主要原因。“我真是受够了,”他说。他想通过个人生活为社会提供价值,把做出正确政治选择的事留给现在参与政治的人。“我只想做个好人,”他说,“下次再见。”
Ronald used to vote regularly. But the ads and their “dramatization of politics” are a major reason he decided not to bother this year. “I’m so fed up,” he said. He wants to provide value to society through his personal life and is leaving making the right political call to the people who participate today. “I just want to be a good person,” he said, “and I’ll see you all next time.”
根据皮尤研究中心的数据,在过去十年里,41%的合格选民参加了全部三次总统大选,四分之一的人在任何一次竞选中都没有投票。研究发现,与参与投票的人相比,不参与的人更年轻、家庭收入更低,且不太可能是白人或受过大学教育。
In the past decade, 41 percent of eligible voters participated in all three presidential elections, according to the Pew Research Center, and one-quarter didn’t vote in any of the contests. When compared with people who did participate, the people who didn’t were younger, had lower family incomes, and were less likely to be white or to have gone to college, the study found.
2024年,特朗普大力争取未投票者的支持,奏效了:在前两届总统大选中未投票的人群中,他以55%对41%的优势领先哈里斯。
In 2024, Trump aggressively targeted nonvoters, and it worked: Among people who hadn’t voted in the previous two presidential contests, he carried the group by 55 percent, compared with Harris’s 41 percent.
笼罩在今天投票之上的一个重大问题是,这些人是否会再次现身——如果会,他们是否会继续支持共和党。亚利桑那州共和党政治顾问洛娜·罗梅罗·弗格森告诉我,选民冷漠反映了对政府和政治领导人的根本不满。“当你失去了那些通常可以指望的铁杆民主党人或铁杆共和党人时,”她说,“选举日就变成了一场碰运气的赌博。”
A major question looming over today’s vote is whether those people show up again—and if so, whether they will stick with Republicans. Lorna Romero Ferguson, a Republican political consultant in Arizona, told me that voter apathy reflects a fundamental unhappiness with the government and political leaders. “When you lose people who are either die-hard Democrats or die-hard Republicans that you typically could count on,” she said, “then it becomes a crapshoot on Election Day.”
在阴谋论和烧毁一切重来的风格开始定义当今政治的背景下,两党都让普通民众感到提不起劲。“要激励一个如此愤怒、如此厌倦政治的选民群体,实在很难,”罗梅罗·弗格森说。
Between the conspiracies and the burn-it-to-the-ground style that have come to define today’s politics, both parties are making regular people feel uninspired. “It’s hard to really motivate an electorate that’s so upset and so turned off by politics,” Romero Ferguson said.
杰米·加西亚最近从埃尔帕索搬到凤凰城,去做一名X光技术员。当我问她为什么不经常投票时,她眼眶湿润。她告诉我,她的家人从未谈论过政治或投票,尽管她的父亲是一名墨西哥移民,在罗纳德·里根总统签署一项法案后,他得以成为公民,该法案为无证移民提供了获得公民身份的途径。她在 2020 年疫情期间的限制下首次也唯一一次投票。她投给了乔·拜登,认为他会改善国家的医疗保健系统。
Jamie Garcia, who recently moved to Phoenix from El Paso for a job as an X-ray tech, teared up when I asked why she doesn’t regularly vote. No one in her family ever talked about politics or voting, she told me, even though her dad, a Mexican immigrant, was able to become a citizen after President Ronald Reagan signed an act that gave undocumented people a path to citizenship. She voted for the first and only time in 2020, amid pandemic-era restrictions. She cast her ballot for Joe Biden, thinking he would improve the nation’s health-care system.
此后她再也没有投票。新闻让她感到压力,因为她不知道谁在说真话,也不知道如何开始辨别事实与虚构。她曾想请朋友帮忙,了解如何开始参与政治,但她担心人们会因为她没有关注而评判她。她犹豫地向我求助:“我怎样才能更了解州长和类似的事务,或者仅仅了解我所在城市正在发生的事情——甚至从那开始——而不感到如此不知所措或压力过大?”两党现在都必须尝试突破像加西亚这样有意回避投票的选民。
She hasn’t shown up again. The news stresses her out because she doesn’t know who is telling the truth or how to even begin to decipher fact from fiction. She has thought about asking friends for advice about how to start becoming politically engaged, but she’s afraid that people will judge her for not having paid attention. She haltingly asked me for help: “How can I be educated more, as far as governors and stuff like that, or just what’s going on in my city—even starting with that—without feeling so overwhelmed or so stressed?”Both parties must now try to break through to voters like Garcia, the ones who have deliberately turned away.