字号·· | 护眼
商业内幕

Anthropic的IPO显示,大型科技公司正如何为AI行业最大的支出热潮提供资金Anthropic's IPO shows how Big Tech is helping fund the AI industry's biggest spending boom

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

Anthropic刚刚为有望成为有史以来最大规模IPO之一的交易定了价。但其更新后的招股书中最有趣的数字,可能不是70美元至78美元的价格区间,甚至也不是由此暗示的1.4万亿美元最高估值,而是260亿美元。这是谷歌、英伟达、AMD、博通、美光、微软和台积电同意通过与IPO同步进行的私人配售向Anthropic注资的金额。

Anthropic just put a price tag on what's on pace to be one of the biggest IPOs ever. But the most interesting number in its updated filing may not be the $70-to-$78 price range, or even the $1.4 trillion max valuation it implies. It's $26 billion. That's how much Google, Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, Micron, Microsoft, and TSMC have agreed to pour into Anthropic through a concurrent private placement at the IPO price.

因此,尽管Anthropic的公开上市本应是对AI交易的一次具有决定性意义的公开市场公投,但推动这一繁荣的公司们已经提前投下了票。正是这个配套安排,使这个故事不仅仅是一则可能创下纪录的IPO新闻。它表明,为AI繁荣提供云算力、芯片和内存的公司,也在帮助为其最大的支出者之一提供资金。好处是,这一安排为Anthropic提供了巨大的融资后盾。

So while Anthropic's public debut is supposed to be a defining public-market referendum on the AI trade, the companies powering the boom will have already cast their votes. That sidecar is what makes this more than a potentially record-breaking IPO story. It shows that the companies selling the cloud capacity, chips, and memory behind the AI boom are also helping to bankroll one of its biggest spenders. The upside is that the arrangement gives Anthropic a huge financing backstop.

坏处是,它让AI交易的循环资本问题更加凸显:供应商投资实验室,而实验室随后用这些钱从同一批供应商那里购买更多产品。包括私人配售在内,Anthropic的合计股份出售可能超过900亿美元。如果全额超额配售期权被行使,该数字可能达到约1000亿美元,足以使整体交易成为历史上最大的股票发行。与IPO同步进行的私人配售并非完全没有先例。

The catch is that it brings the AI trade's circular-capital question into sharper focus: Suppliers invest in labs, which then use that money to buy more products from those same suppliers. Including the private placement, Anthropic's combined share sale could total more than $90 billion. If the full overallotment option is exercised, that figure could reach roughly $100 billion, enough to make the overall deal the biggest share offering in history. IPOs running concurrent with private placements are not entirely unprecedented.

例如,Arm Holdings在其2023年的发行中,就安排了许多相同的公司作为基石投资者。但Anthropic的版本在规模和架构上都处于完全不同的层面。Arm的战略投资者表示有兴趣在IPO中购买最多7.35亿美元的股票。与此同时,Anthropic的支持者则通过单独的交易购买260亿美元的单独非投票股,尽管每股价格与IPO相同。那么,私人配售对普通投资者来说是好事还是坏事?

Arm Holdings, for instance, lined up many of these same companies as cornerstone investors in its 2023 offering. But Anthropic's version is in a different universe in terms of both scale and setup. Arm's strategic investors signaled interest in buying up to $735 million of stock within the IPO. Anthropic's backers, meanwhile, are buying $26 billion of separate non-voting stock through a separate deal, although at the same per-share price as the IPO. So is the private placement a good or bad thing for everyday investors?

好处相当直接:Anthropic 获得 260 亿美元的新资本,无需为此支付承销费。这些资金来自口袋深厚的合作伙伴,他们都有财务利益支持其扩张。这不是那种一遇到麻烦就抛售 IPO 的反复无常的资金。但公众投资者不应将这种支持与清晰、独立的信任投票混淆。部分需求已被预先承诺。Google 行使了一项预先存在的 IPO 期权,而 AMD 的购买履行了此前供应承诺的一部分。

The upside is quite straightforward: Anthropic gets $26 billion of fresh capital without having to pay underwriting fees on it. And it's coming from deep-pocketed partners who all have a financial interest in its expansion. It's not the type of fickle money that tends to flip an IPO at the first sign of trouble. But public investors should not confuse that support with a clean, independent vote of confidence. Some of the demand was already spoken for. Google exercised a pre-existing IPO option, while AMD's purchase fulfills part of an earlier supply commitment.

从机制上看,私人配售意味着公众 IPO 买家将拥有较小一部分 Anthropic 的股份,比他们原本可能拥有的要少。公司最初将拥有相对较小的公开交易股票池,这可能导致早期交易更加波动。Anthropic 的 IPO 仍将是对 AI 交易的重大考验,但投资者应记住他们在测试什么。不是 AI 行业能否继续为自身融资,而是 Anthropic 在辅助轮撤下能否最终为自身融资。

And in terms of mechanics, the private placement makes it so that public IPO buyers will own a smaller slice of Anthropic than they otherwise could. The company will have a relatively smaller pool of publicly traded stock at the outset, which could make early trading more volatile. Anthropic's IPO will still be a major test for the AI trade, but investors should remember what they're testing. It's not whether the AI industry can keep financing itself. It's whether Anthropic can eventually fund itself once the training wheels come off.

阅读媒体原文 ↗