龚古尔学院已将泰勒松·奥雷利安的小说《要么这样，要么去死》从法国最高文学奖的首轮入围名单中除名。学院周五发表声明称，该作者存在抄袭行为，且多项分析显示，该书大部分内容极有可能由人工智能撰写。
The Académie Goncourt has dropped Thélyson Orélien’s novel C’était ça ou mourir from the first selection for France’s top literary prize. In a statement on Friday, the academy cited plagiarism by the author and analyses showing that AI had most likely written most of the book.
据《卫报》记者菲利普·奥尔特曼报道，奥雷利安否认使用人工智能。据路透社报道，他的处女作讲述了一名海地移民穿越拉丁美洲，最终抵达加拿大的故事。
Orélien denies using AI, Philip Oltermann reported for the Guardian. His debut follows a Haitian migrant who travels through Latin America before reaching Canada, Reuters reported.
学院表示，其依据是“多位可信研究人员和记者进行的几项分析得出的趋同结果”。学院称，这些分析表明，这部小说“极有可能在很大程度上是人工智能的产物”。学院还指出，作者长期存在的抄袭行为刚刚被揭露。上述引文为TNW对法文声明的翻译。
What the academy said The academy pointed to “the convergent result of several analyses by trustworthy researchers and journalists”. It said they showed the novel is “in all likelihood very largely the product of an artificial intelligence”. It also cited plagiarism that the author had committed over time, which had just come to light. The quotes are TNW’s translation of the French statement.
学院表示，其职责是“推广并表彰由男女作家创作的文学作品”。学院希望向龚古尔高中生奖、龚古尔囚犯奖以及海外50多个龚古尔选择奖的评审团传递一个明确的信息。
The academy said its role is “to promote and crown literature written by women and men”. It wanted to send a clear message to the students of the Goncourt des Lycéens, the prisoners of the Goncourt des Détenus and more than 50 Choix Goncourt juries abroad.
学院称：“我们既不认可，也不以任何方式祝福借助人工智能生成的文本。”
“We neither endorse nor give our blessing in any way to the creation of texts generated with the help of AI,” the academy said.
学院表示将不再作进一步评论，并将于10月6日公布第二轮入围名单。据《卫报》报道，获奖者将于11月4日揭晓。
It will make no further comment and will publish its second selection on 6 October. The winner is due on 4 November, according to the Guardian.
据《卫报》报道，学院主席菲利普·克洛德尔周三曾呼吁对人工智能相关的指控保持谨慎。随后出现的抄袭报告似乎改变了学院的看法。
Philippe Claudel, the academy’s president, had urged caution over the AI claims on Wednesday, the Guardian reported. The plagiarism reports that followed appeared to change the academy’s view.
这些指控始于一个名为“Balance ton Claude”的匿名X账号，该名称影射了Anthropic公司的人工智能。该账号于9月21日发布了这一指控，而这一天正是该小说获得Fnac小说奖的日子。该账号称，其使用人工智能检测工具Pangram对这本书进行了检测，并声称人工智能“几乎完全”撰写了这部小说。
How the claims started onymous X account called Balance ton Claude, a reference to Anthropic’s AI, posted the accusation on 21 September. That was the same day the novel won the Prix du roman Fnac. The account said it ran the book through Pangram, an AI detection tool. It claimed AI wrote the novel “almost entirely”.
《费加罗报》指出，其专栏作家兼散文家塞缪尔·菲图西（Samuel Fitoussi）可能是该虚假账号的幕后操纵者。据路透社报道，菲图西后来承认自己是与其他人共同运营了这个账号的。
Le Figaro identified one of its own columnists, essayist Samuel Fitoussi, as the person behind the account. Fitoussi later said he ran it with other people, according to Reuters.
路透社还指出，一些专家对人工智能检测工具的可靠性表示怀疑。据《卫报》报道，其他检测工具也认为这篇小说很可能是人工撰写的。
Some experts question how reliable AI detection tools are, Reuters reported. French media found other detectors that rated the novel as very probably human-written, according to the Guardian.
随后，关于抄袭的指控也随之出现：《解放报》（Libération）称奥雷利安（Orélien）2012年获得奖项的短篇小说抄袭了路易·鲍威尔斯（Louis Pauwels）的序言；《新闻报》（La Presse）则指出奥雷利安2013年发表的一篇评论文章实际上抄袭自《菲律宾星报》（The Philippine Star）。
The plagiarism claims came next. Libération reported that a 2012 prize-winning short story by Orélien copied a preface by Louis Pauwels. La Presse also reported that a 2013 opinion piece copied from The Philippine Star, according to Reuters.