
周一上午,在最高法院外,当大法官们正在审理一起具有里程碑意义的气候责任诉讼案时,由“气候诚信中心”与“无化石燃料媒体”组织的集会吸引了约百名民众参与。许多人举着标语牌,上面写着“气候变化绝非偶然”“最高法院请别干涉博尔德”“警告:燃烧化石燃料会摧毁文明”等字样。集会过程中,参与者们多次以呼应的方式高呼“他们心知肚明,却撒谎欺骗”,以此指责那些化石燃料行业的科学家与企业高管——早在50多年前他们就已清楚燃烧化石燃料会导致全球气温升高,却故意散布质疑言论来削弱科学证据的可信度。
On Monday morning outside the Supreme Court, as Justices heard arguments concerning a landmark climate liability lawsuit, a rally organized by the Center for Climate Integrity and Fossil Free Media drew a crowd of roughly one hundred people. Many carried signs with messages like “Climate Change is No Accident,” “SCOTUS Hands Off Boulder,” and “Warning: Burning Fossil Fuels Can Destroy Civilization.”At several points, The People v. Big Oil gathering chanted “They knew, they lied” in a call-and-response, referencing fossil fuel scientists and executives who knew more than 50 years ago that burning fossil fuels would raise global temperatures, and instead sowed doubt to undermine scientific evidence.
2021年马歇尔大火的幸存者路易·特拉华对在场民众说道:“任何企业或行业都无权通过隐瞒对民众健康、社区安全及未来发展至关重要的信息来谋取利益。事实就是:他们心知肚明,却撒谎欺骗,必须为自己的行为承担法律责任。”那场大火席卷科罗拉多州博尔德市时,特拉华与同一条街上的约50户居民都失去了家园,他的家人流离失所长达两年半之久。除他之外,马歇尔大火的其他幸存者,以及2025年加利福尼亚州阿尔塔迪纳市伊顿大火的幸存者们也都在集会上发了言。
As Louie Delaware, a survivor of the 2021 Marshall Fire told the crowd, “No company or industry should gain an advantage by hiding facts that people need to protect their health, their communities, and their future. The bottom line is that they knew, they lied, and they must be accountable for their actions.”Delaware lost his home along with roughly 50 others on his street when the fire devastated Boulder, Colorado. His family was displaced for more than two and a half years. Other survivors of the Marshall Fire spoke at the rally, as well as survivors of the 2025 Eaton fire in Altadena, California.
与此同时,在法庭内,大法官们正在听取一场备受瞩目的案件的辩论。该案件的核心争议在于地方政府是否有权因化石燃料企业对气候变化的推波助澜而要求其赔偿损失。这些化石燃料企业则辩称,州级法院无权要求跨国公司为全球范围内的环境损害承担责任。正如我上周所报道的那样,此案源于博尔德市与县政府于2018年对多家能源企业提起的诉讼。
Meanwhile, inside the courtroom, the justices heard arguments in widely regarded as a seminal case concerning the issue of whether or not local governments can demand damages from fossil fuel companies for their contributions to climate change. The fossil fuel companies are arguing that a state court can’t hold multinational companies accountable for global harm. As I reported last week The case revolves around a dispute between the City and County of Boulder, which first sued the energy companies in 2018 They are arguing that Suncor and Exxon deceived the public about the dangers of climate change and should be forced to pay damages for climate-induced heat waves, wildfires, droughts, and floods.
博尔德方面指控森科尔和埃克森美孚故意向公众隐瞒气候变化的危害,因此理应为由此引发的酷热天气、野火、干旱及洪水等灾害承担赔偿责任。“随着气候变化日益严重,相关损失还将持续增加,”博尔德在诉状中这样写道。而森科尔与埃克森美孚则恳请大法官们在该案进入庭审前即予以驳回,以免引发更多各州层面的气候诉讼。
“The damages will only multiply as climate change worsens,” Boulder stated in its lawsuit. Suncor and Exxon, meanwhile, are asking the justices to kill the case before it makes it to trial—and with it a host of other state-level climate cases.
最终裁决结果将取决于八位大法官的判定——本周早些时候,大法官塞缪尔·阿利托宣布退出此案审理,这一决定被不少人视为临门一脚的举措。此案的判决不仅会对科罗拉多州的民众产生深远影响,其波及范围更会超出该州边界:数十起其他与气候相关的诉讼均悬而未决,等待这一裁决的指引。
Depending on how the eight justices rule—Justice Samuel Alito announced what some considered to be an 11th hour recusal earlier this week—the case could have far-reaching consequences for people [in Colorado]. But its implications extend beyond the state’s borders:
“伊顿大火夺走了我姐姐以及其他18条生命。我们家失去了五处住所,其中就包括我儿时居住的家,”扎伊尔·卡尔文悲痛地说道,他的姐姐伊芙琳·麦克伦登便在这场灾难中丧生。“从阿尔塔迪纳到博尔德,我们都有着各自的故事。今天,我们团结一致,只有一个诉求:让证据得以呈现,让责任得以认定。”目前,加利福尼亚州针对多家石油巨头提起的气候责任诉讼正处于搁置状态,静候最高法院对博尔德案的裁决结果。
dozens of other climate-related lawsuits hang in the balance of how is decided“The Eaton Fire took my sister and eighteen other people. My family lost five homes, including my childhood home,” said Zaire Calvin, who lost his sister, Evelyn McClendon to the disaster. “From Altadena to Boulder, we carry different stories. Today, we stand together in one demand: let the evidence be heard. Let responsibility be determined.”California’s own climate liability lawsuit against major oil companies is currently on hold while the Supreme Court weighs in on the Boulder case.
“从阿尔塔迪纳到博尔德,我们承载着各自的故事。今天,我们团结一致,只为一个诉求:让证据得到倾听,让责任得以认定。”周一,前华盛顿州州长杰伊·英斯利也出现在法庭外。“化石燃料行业蓄意且恶意地向美国民众撒谎。我绝不会允许他们剥夺美国人追究企业责任、诉诸法庭的权利,”他说道,“几十年来,他们明明清楚自己产品带来的后果,却依然选择撒谎。”
“From Altadena to Boulder, we carry different stories. Today, we stand together in one demand: let the evidence be heard. Let responsibility be determined.”Former Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee was also present on Monday outside the courtroom. “The fossil fuel industry malignantly and maliciously lied to the American people, and I’ll be damned if I let them take away an American right to hold industries accountable and have their day in court,” he said.
2021年,英斯利签署了《华盛顿气候承诺法案》,该法案是一项以市场机制为基础的碳排放总量控制与投资计划。如今,他已成为反对那些试图出台气候责任诉讼豁免法律的行业势力的主要代言人。
“They knew for decades what the consequences of their products were, and they chose to lie.”In 2021, Inslee signed Washington’s Climate Commitment Act a market-based cap-and-invest program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and has emerged as a leading voice against industry pushing against sweeping immunity laws against climate liability lawsuits.
演讲结束后,我与迪尔德丽·麦克纳布以及凯瑟琳·贝德尔博士进行了交谈。她们都是来自里奥布兰科县的牧场主,从事再生农业养殖,此次专程从当地赶往华盛顿参加活动。在采访完麦克纳布后,我问她站在最高法院面前是什么感受。“我很高兴这件事能提交到最高法院审理。现在我们需要团结起来,我们一定能解决这个问题,”她说,“不过我们必须让那些大公司也参与进来,也就是那些石油企业。”
When the speeches ended, I spoke with Deirdre Macnab and Dr. Kathryn Bedell, two regenerative cattle ranchers from Rio Blanco County who had traveled to Washington for the event. After interviewing Macnab I asked her what it felt like to be in front of the Supreme Court. “I’m glad it’s coming to the Supreme Court. Now we need to come together. We can solve this,” she said. “But we’ve got to bring the big boys to the table, and that’s the oil companies.”
同为牧场主的贝德尔也呼应了这一呼吁,并强调了野火、干旱与极端高温带来的破坏性影响。“我认为在座没有人能够否认气候变化的影响。如果我们不做出改变,很快就会在食品供应上显现出后果,”她对我说,“如果无法种植粮食,我们就只能依赖进口,那样我们就既无法保障粮食安全,也无法控制物价。人们应该感到恐惧才对,我自己就深感恐惧。”
Fellow rancher Bedell echoed her call to action, and underscored the devastating effects of wildfires, drought, and extreme heat. “I think there isn’t anybody here who should be able to deny the impacts of climate change. It’s going to be obvious in our food supply pretty soon if we don’t change,” she told me. “If you can’t grow food, we have to import it, and we won’t have any food security or control over the price. People should be terrified. It terrifies me.”
贝德尔是第六代务农者,从事牧场经营已有三十余年,如今却被迫出售自己的牛群。“这些牛都是世代饲养下来的,我对每一头都了如指掌。它们将于12月19日被送往拍卖场。”
Bedell, a sixth-generation farmer who has been a rancher for over three decades, has been forced to sell her cattle. “I’ve had these same cattle for generations, so I know them all personally. They’re moving to the sale yard on December 19.”
口头辩论即将结束时,我又与路易·特拉华以及另一位马歇尔大火的幸存者珍妮·辛格-鲁普交谈。“自由民主制度的基本原则之一便是‘弱者’也能挑战‘强者’。每个人都有权利在法庭上为自己辩护,”特拉华对我说。他提到了烟草行业与制药公司因阿片类药物成瘾问题而达成的和解案例,并补充道:“这些企业规模庞大,但也有许多类似的大型企业曾在法庭上败诉。”
As oral arguments drew to a close, I spoke with Louie Delaware and another Marshall Fire survivor, Jenny Singer-Rupp. “One of the tenets of a free democracy is ‘the David’ can go after ‘the Goliath’. Everybody deserves their day in court to be able to prove their case,” Delaware told me. He pointed to settlements by the tobacco industries and pharmaceutical companies over opioid addiction, adding, “They’re huge entities, but there are a lot of huge entities that have been taken down in court.”
辛格-鲁普只是为了自己的孩子而抗争。“我的孩子们常跟我谈论气候变化与自然灾害,他们对自己的未来忧心忡忡,”她说,“我从没想过自己能站在最高法院面前,但我正在竭尽全力为他们守护未来。”
Singer-Rupp is simply fighting for her children. “My kids talk to me about climate change and natural disasters, and they’re worried about their future,” she said. “I never thought I’d be standing in front of the Supreme Court. But I’m doing everything I can to protect that future for them.”