
卡罗是密歇根州中部一座约有4000名居民的城市,也是图斯科拉县的县治。2024年,唐纳德·特朗普在此以超过40个百分点的优势获胜。在大选日前两周多的一个凛冽的周六下午,我驾驶租车前往那里,想看看进步派猛将、联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-萨耶德举行的一场市政厅会议。途中打开收音机,立刻听到右翼脱口秀主持人正大肆赞扬埃隆·马斯克。
Caro is a city of about 4,000 people in central Michigan and the seat of Tuscola County, which Donald Trump won by more than 40 percentage points in 2024. On a brisk Saturday afternoon, just more than two weeks before Election Day, I drove there in a rental car to see progressive firebrand Abdul El-Sayed, a candidate for U.S. Senate, hold a town hall. When I flipped on the radio en route to Caro, I immediately heard the hosts of a right-wing talk show lavishing praise on Elon Musk.
一路驱车穿过玉米地和风力涡轮机阵列,听着对这位反动科技大亨的推崇,我感到一阵恶心;可抵达现场时眼前的景象却让我惊讶:数百人在社区中心外排起长队,等着听一位伯尼·桑德斯背书的民主党人讲话。埃尔-萨耶德从未担任过民选职务,在民调中以微弱优势领先前共和党众议员迈克·罗杰斯,角逐一位退休民主党议员留下的空缺席位。
After many miles of driving alongside corn fields and wind turbines, while listening queasily to admiration for the reactionary tech tycoon, I was surprised at what I saw upon my arrival: hundreds of people lined up outside a community center waiting to hear what a Bernie Sanders-backed Democrat had to say. El-Sayed, who has never held elected office, has a narrow lead in the polls against former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers for a seat left open by a retiring Democrat.
埃尔-萨耶德身穿标志性的紧身黑衬衫和牛仔裤登台。他先开玩笑说,之所以来卡罗,是因为它与开罗只差一个字母——暗指他的埃及血统——随即列举美国“本不该这么难”的事情,迅速点燃全场:加满一箱油、多买一袋杂货、看一场病。当他以“本不该这么难交税,却知道这些钱会花在你和你的孩子身上,而不是扔炸炸别人和别人的孩子身上”作结时,全场沸腾。
El-Sayed took to the stage in his signature tightly fitting black shirt and jeans. After joking that he had come to Caro because it was one letter off from Cairo — a nod to his Egyptian ancestry — he immediately worked the crowd up by listing things that “shouldn’t be this hard” in America: buying a tank of gas, buying a second bag of groceries, seeing a doctor. When he ended the list by declaring, “Shouldn’t be this hard to pay your taxes and know that that money’s going to be spent on you and your kids instead of dropping bombs on somebody else and their kids,” the crowd roared.
随后,埃尔-萨耶德与卡罗观众展开了一段问答互动,将其核心竞选主题刻入人心:“钱要走出?” “政治!”他们高呼。“钱要进?” “口袋!”“全民?” “医保!”
Then came a call-and-response from El-Sayed and the Caro crowd that hammered home his core campaign themes: “Money out of?”“Politics!” they shouted. “Money in your?”“Pockets!”“Medicare for?”“All!”
2026年10月18日,密歇根州弗林特市的一次竞选活动中,来自施瓦茨克里克的玛拉·马蒂安(前排左侧)跟着埃尔-萨耶德高呼口号。奎因·班克斯/《密歇根州现在》摄卡罗现场的许多人在埃尔-赛义德发言时点头表示赞同。他说:“唐纳德·特朗普本人并非我们政治的病根。他是我们政治病症中最恶劣的症状。病根是那个允许大公司、亿万富翁和特殊利益集团买通和出卖政客、并以此操纵体制对抗我们的制度。”
Marla Martian, front-left, of Schwartz Creek, Michigan, shouts along with El-Sayed on Oct. 18, 2026, at a campaign event in Flint, Michigan. Quinn Banks for MS NOW Many in the Caro crowd nodded as El-Sayed said, “Donald Trump is not himself the disease of our politics. He’s the worst symptom of the disease of our politics. The disease is the system that allows big corporations and billionaires and special interests to buy and sell politicians in ways that leave them rigging the system against us.”
他的措辞常让人联想到他受过医生训练。他在哥伦比亚大学完成医学院学业后从未行医,但曾在牛津大学获得公共卫生学博士学位,并曾担任韦恩县卫生局局长,该县是底特律所在地。
His language frequently draws attention to his training as a doctor. He never practiced medicine after finishing medical school at Columbia, but he earned a doctorate in public health from Oxford, and he has served as a health director for Wayne County, which is home to Detroit.
气氛是在埃尔-赛义德表示将回答提问后变得沉重起来。在可能成为2026年中期选举最广为传播的时刻,一名自称汤米的观众站起来问埃尔-赛义德是否会“与穆斯林兄弟会划清界限”,汤米称该伊斯兰主义组织为“恐怖组织”。埃尔-赛义德表示他完全可以与穆斯林兄弟会划清界限,并当场这么做了。随后,他驳斥了汤米提问带有偏见的前提,并就宪法和宗教自由对他进行了一番说教。
It was after El-Sayed said he’d answer questions that the mood darkened. In what may be the most viral moment of the 2026 midterm elections, a man in the audience who identified himself as Tommy stood up and asked El-Sayed if he would “disavow the Muslim Brotherhood,” an Islamist organization that Tommy called a “terrorist group.”El-Sayed said he’d have no problem disavowing the Muslim Brotherhood and did so. He then rejected the bigoted basis for Tommy’s question, and lectured him on the Constitution and freedom of religion.

左图:一名与会者聆听美国众议员阿亚娜·普雷斯利发言。右图:埃尔-赛义德向社区成员和支持者发表讲话。Quinn Banks for MS NOW 摄现场没有迹象表明 El-Sayed 或屋内任何人知道 Tommy 就是 Thomas Teepell,一名共和党操盘手,最著名的经历是曾任参议员乔什·霍利(Josh Hawley,共和党-密苏里州)的助手。
Left: An attendee listens to U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley. Right: El-Sayed speaks to community members and supporters. Quinn Banks for MS NOW There has been no indication that El-Sayed, or anyone else in the room, knew that Tommy was Thomas Teepell, a GOP operative who most notably worked as a former aide to Sen. Josh Hawley , R-Mo.
但我坐在屋里看着他们的交锋,被 El-Sayed 对他的敌对、甚至带有轻蔑的语气所震惊。大多数政客都会设法敷衍干扰者话语的实质内容,如果不直接让人把他们请出去的话。当 Teepell 起身离开时,一名女子高喊:“拜拜,Tommy!”突然,整个屋子响起一片“拜拜,Tommy!拜拜,Tommy!”的合唱声,伴着他走出大门。
But watching their exchange from inside the room, I was struck by El-Sayed’s antagonistic, even scornful, tone with him. Most politicians find a way to brush off the substance of what their hecklers say, if they don’t have them escorted out altogether. As Teepell began to leave, a woman yelled, “Bye, Tommy!”All of a sudden, a whole chorus of “Bye, Tommy! Bye, Tommy!” rang out as he walked out the door.
“Tommy” 或许以为他在 Caro 发动伊斯兰恐惧症攻击会奏效,但 El-Sayed 将他击退,他夹着尾巴在嘲声中狼狈离场。
“Tommy” might have thought his Islamophobic attack would do well in Caro, but El-Sayed beat him back, and he walked out being jeered, with his tail between his legs.
Caro 的市政厅会议生动展现了 El-Sayed 竞选的振奋人心的可能性——以及针对他的黑暗反动势力。
The Caro town hall dramatized the exhilarating possibilities of El-Sayed’s campaign — and the dark reactionary forces arrayed against him.
El-Sayed 不是社会主义者,但他得到许多社会主义者的支持;他主张政府主办的医疗保险、对抗企业权力、并愿意称以色列的战争为“种族灭绝”,这标志着与美国标准自由主义的决裂。他的竞选体现了一种信念——与民主党建制派背道而驰——即政治体制必须变革,而左翼有可能在美国腹地为这一努力建立基础。在那场 Caro 市政厅会议上,这种变革仿佛触手可及。
El-Sayed is not a socialist , but he is backed by many of them , and his demands for government-backed health insurance, hostility toward corporate power, and willingness to call Israel’s war a “genocide” represents a break from standard American liberalism. His campaign embodies a belief — contra the Democratic establishment — that the political system must change and that the left can plausibly build a base for that effort in heartland America. In that Caro town hall, that change felt like a possibility.
但 “Tommy” 代表了右翼对这一愿景的反制。不是以驳斥,而是通过煽动偏见、将进步政治污名化为外来输入。密歇根州立大学政治学家马特·格罗斯曼(Matt Grossmann)告诉我,穆斯林是“选民愿意表达厌恶的极少数群体之一”。密歇根州近 40% 的选民承认他们不太可能支持穆斯林候选人,而共和党对 El-Sayed 的攻击主要集中在他是穆斯林、出生于埃及移民家庭,以暗示他是“冒险”的极端分子。
But “Tommy” represents the right’s counter to this vision. Not with rebuttal, but by fostering bigotry and smearing progressive politics as an alien import. Michigan State University political scientist Matt Grossmann told me Muslims are “one of the few demographics that voters are willing to express that they dislike.”Nearly 40% of voters in Michigan have admitted they’re less likely to support a Muslim candidate, and the GOP’s attacks on El-Sayed have mostly focused on him being a Muslim born to Egyptian immigrants to imply he’s a “risky” extremist.
一些政客可能会对这种政治环境的反应是装出一副和蔼可亲的样子,但埃尔-赛义德不会。对一些密歇根州选民来说,这反而让他更具吸引力。那一周,我跟随埃尔-赛义德穿梭全州,与数十位选民进行了交谈。我采访的几乎每一位市政厅集会参加者,都把埃尔-赛义德那种犀利的演讲风格——其中惯常包含用严厉语辞攻击对手——形容为他们被他吸引的原因。
Some politicians might react to such a political environment by affecting an air of amicability, but El-Sayed doesn’t. For some Michiganders, that makes him all the more appealing. I spoke to dozens of voters that week as I followed El-Sayed criss-crossing the state. Nearly every town hall attendee I spoke to described El-Sayed’s fierce speaking style — which routinely includes cutting down his opponents with harsh language — as a reason they were drawn to him.
“我喜欢他近乎尖锐的风格,喜欢他如此诚实、如此直率,以及他所诚实、直率对待的那些事,”住在米德兰的36岁客服从业者特雷瓦娜告诉我。
“I like how he’s almost abrasive, like how honest and how raw he is, and the things that he’s honest and raw about,” Trevana, a 36-year-old customer service professional who lives in Midland, told me.

埃尔-赛义德于2026年10月18日与来自密歇根州霍利的泽尔达·科尼什握手。Quinn Banks for MS NOW住在农村贝县、在大学经济援助办公室工作的亚历克丝-乔说,她过去投过共和党和第三党的票,原本不打算这次投票——但随后被他的强硬形象打动了:“我觉得建制派民主党人低估了大选政治气候的动荡程度,而我觉得他不会任人践踏,”她说。
El-Sayed shakes hands with Zelda Cornish from Holly, Michigan, on Oct. 18, 2026. Quinn Banks for MS NOW Alexus-Jo, a university financial aid office staffer who lives in rural Bay County, said she has in the past voted Republican and third party, and wasn’t planning to vote at all this time — but then she was moved by his tough persona: “I feel like establishment Democrats underestimate how volatile the general political climate is, and I feel like he’s not being stepped all over,” she said.
她补充道:“看到我的共和党家人或非民主党人士说,‘我不太喜欢这个主意,但他在某些方面让我觉得,“好吧,我听着呢”’,这真的让我充满干劲,想更多地参与政治。”
She added, “Seeing my Republican family members or people that aren’t Democrats say, ‘I don’t love the idea, but he’s got some things where I’m like, “OK, I’m listening,”’ that has really made me energized to get more into politics.”
我此行密歇根州的目的,是想看看一位与伯尼·桑德斯左翼路线一致的候选人,如何与远离该运动赖以生存的深蓝城市和选区的选民建立联系并说服他们——以及这位候选人如何抵御右翼攻击。埃尔-赛义德似乎正通过无视党派色彩和标签,在一个彻头彻尾的紫州与选民建立联系。
My goal in Michigan was to see how a candidate aligned with the Bernie Sanders left connects with and persuades voters far from the deep-blue cities and districts where the movement has thrived — and how that candidate withstands right-wing attacks. El-Sayed is connecting with voters in a thoroughly purple state, it seems, by disregarding colors and labels.
“没有所谓的‘进步派’与‘保守派’观点之分,那是我们编造出来的,”在贝城一家剧院举行的、座无虚席的500人市政厅会议后,埃尔-赛义德对我说道。这个小城市位于一个支持特朗普的县,正如他所指出的,该县曾两次投票给贝拉克·奥巴马总统。“红州蓝州不是真的,那些都不是真实存在的东西。真实的是,人们被排除在政治之外,因为这个体制允许大公司和特殊利益集团买通他们的政客。”
“There’s no such thing called ‘progressive’ versus ‘conservative’ ideas, we make that up,” El- Sayed told me after a packed 500-person town hall at a theater in Bay City, a small urban center in a Trump-friendly county which , to his point, voted twice for President Barack Obama. “Red and blue are not real, those are not real things. What’s real is people are locked out of their politics by a system that allows big corporations and special interests to buy their politicians.”
极左派长期以来一直认为,诉诸人们共同的阶级利益可以跨越文化差异和既有的意识形态壁垒。埃尔-赛义德与罗杰斯的竞选将成为近期检验这一理论最具决定性意义的一次考验。
The far left has long believed that appealing to people’s shared class interests can cut across cultural differences and pre-existing ideological barriers. El-Sayed’s race against Rogers will be the most consequential test of that theory in recent memory.
埃尔-赛义德在摇摆选民中的潜在优势可归纳为三方面:他作为斗士的特定魅力模式;他对“全民医保”的关注——以及略带误导性的框架表述;以及他以能同时吸引左右派选民的方式,将外国援助和犯罪等议题进行框架化表述的能力。
El-Sayed’s potential strength with swing voters can be placed in three buckets: his specific mode of charisma as a fighter; his focus on — and slightly misleading framing of — Medicare for All; and his ability to frame issues including foreign aid and crime in ways that can appeal to voters on the right and left.
在当下这个时代,对现状的愤怒是跨越党派分歧的一种途径。埃尔-赛义德作为一名拼搏者的形象,配上他显眼的肌肉发达的体格,使他能在两党都渴望民粹能量的时刻散发出这种能量。他的一项新电视广告活动强调了他对抗“腐败沼泽地”和华盛顿“精英”的可信度,以凸显“让美国再次伟大”(MAGA)共和党人可能在哪些方面认同他的世界观。
In our era, anger at the status quo is a way to reach across the aisle. El-Sayed’s persona as a scrapper, enhanced by his conspicuously muscular physique, allows him to radiate populist energy at a time of bipartisan demand for it. A new TV ad campaign of his emphasizes his credibility going up against the “corrupt swamp” and the “elites” in Washington to highlight where MAGA Republicans might find something in common with his worldview.
当埃尔-赛义德在卡罗回怼“汤米”时,我赞同他的论点,但也感到尴尬——对市政厅会议参与者表现出居高临下的态度通常属于失言范畴。但那是旧式的修辞规范,正是因为埃尔-赛义德回应得如此强硬,他才奏了效。他引发了一个关于伊斯兰恐惧症及其竞选活动的新闻周期,在主流媒体和社交媒体上为自己赢得了广泛的正面关注,并利用这一冲突时刻筹集资金。
When El-Sayed fired back at “Tommy,” in Caro, I agreed with his argument, but I also winced — condescension toward a town hall participant is usually gaffe territory. But that’s an old-school rhetorical norm, and it is precisely because El-Sayed responded so forcefully that he was effective. He kicked off a news cycle about Islamophobia and his campaign, brought broadly positive attention to himself in the mainstream press and on social media, and used the moment of confrontation to raise money.
尽管如此,这种好斗的作风也有明显的潜在弊端。在初选中,埃尔-赛义德以微弱优势获胜,但因在竞选期间对对手表现出居高临下的态度而屡遭抨击,他可能会失去那些偏好调和或强调团结的演说家的选民。
Still, there are obvious potential downsides to such pugilism. El-Sayed was repeatedly panned for being patronizing toward his opponents during a primary he won by a narrow margin, and he might miss out on voters who prefer conciliatory or unity-focused orators.
当我在埃尔-赛义德的竞选大巴上,随车从弗林特前往底特律的途中问他是否曾对自己的强硬风格产生过怀疑时,他答道:“我就是我。”他接着说:“我喜欢建设东西。我重建了一个卫生部门,领导过另一个,建立过各种项目。但当你看到为什么我们在美国无法为劳动者建设时,往往是因为唐纳德·特朗普、迈克·罗杰斯和J·D·万斯这类人的疯狂政治。所以如果你们要来破坏我们想要建设的东西,是的,我会站出来对抗你们。”
When I asked El-Sayed, while riding on his campaign bus between Flint and Detroit, if he ever second-guessed his abrasive style, he answered, “I just am who I am.”He continued, “I like to build stuff. I rebuilt a health department, led another one, built programs. But too often, when you look at why we are not building for working people in America, it’s because of the insane politics from folks like Donald Trump and Mike Rogers and JD Vance. So if you’re coming to break the things that we want to build, yeah, I’m going to stand up to you.”

埃尔-赛义德从美国州、县和市政雇员联合会成员手中接过一只腕带。Quinn Banks for MS NOW 摄我采访的几乎每一位选民都提到,埃尔-赛义德对“全民医保”的支持是他们关注的关键点。健康研究机构KFF在9月发现,66%的美国人,包括近40%的共和党人,支持“一个全国性健康计划,有时被称为‘全民医保’,即所有美国人都从单一政府计划获得保险”——这是该机构约十年前开始提问以来的最高比例。密歇根州一位顶级民调专家发现,密歇根州对“全民医保”的支持率为62%。
El-Sayed receives a wristband from American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees members. Quinn Banks for MS NOW Virtually every voter I interviewed cited El-Sayed’s support for Medicare for All as a key point of interest. KFF, a health research group, found in September that 66% of Americans, including nearly 40% of Republicans, support “a national health plan, sometimes called Medicare-for-all, in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan” — the highest share since they started asking the question about a decade ago. A top pollster in Michigan found support for Medicare for All in Michigan is at 62% .
马克·布鲁尔是一名65岁的独立选民、退休建筑工人,住在梅维尔村附近。他告诉我,他认为埃尔-赛义德支持“全民医保”是个好主意。他过去曾投票给自由意志党候选人,并自称“在财政上是保守派”,但他感到沮丧的是,他在健康保险上花费的巨额资金从未能保证他获得医疗服务。
Mark Brewer, a 65-year-old independent voter and retired construction worker who lives near the village of Mayville, told me he thought El-Sayed’s support for Medicare for All was a good idea. He has voted for libertarian candidates in the past, and told me he’s “financially conservative,” but was frustrated that the vast amount of money he spent on health insurance never guaranteed him care.
“我干了40年建筑。这期间我缴了37.5万美元的医疗保险费。退休那天,保险就停了,”他说。他说,他不得不在没有保险的情况下过了三年,直到符合联邦医疗保险(Medicare)的资格,他对此很不满。
“I worked construction for 40 years. I paid $375,000 into health insurance during that time. The day I retired, it stopped,” he said. He said he was unhappy he had to go three years without insurance until he qualified for Medicare.
61岁的米德兰居民塔德·萨姆纳从事银行和IT工作,他说2016年他支持的是希拉里·克林顿,而不是伯尼·桑德斯,但他慢慢转向了左翼,并逐渐认同了埃尔-赛义德的医疗观点,因为“医疗保健变得越来越利润化了”。
Tad Sumner, a 61-year-old Midland resident who works in banking and IT, said in 2016, he was for Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, but he has slowly moved to the left and toward El-Sayed’s healthcare views because “health care has become more and more profitized.”
对“全民联邦医疗保险”持怀疑态度的人,往往害怕失去自己现有的保险,哪怕它并不完善。埃尔-赛义德如何让他们安心?“人们对现行制度感到沮丧,”他告诉我。“我无意拿走任何东西。我感兴趣的是为你提供一份从摇篮到坟墓的医疗保险保障,不必担心网络内还是网络外,不必担心保费、共付额或免赔额。”
People skeptical about Medicare for All are often afraid of losing the insurance they do have, as flawed as it is. How does El-Sayed put them at ease? “People are frustrated by the current system,” he told me. “I’m not interested in taking anything away. I’m interested in offering you a guarantee for health insurance, cradle to grave, without worrying about a network, or out of network, without worrying about a premium, copay or deductible.”
与一些“全民联邦医疗保险”的倡导者不同,埃尔-赛义德说,他的计划不会禁止重复性的私人保险。但正如“人民政策项目”创始人马特·布鲁尼格在《雅各宾》杂志上所指出的,这实际上是一种障眼法。在公共计划出现、许多雇主放弃医疗保险之后,人们不太可能——也不太有意愿——去购买昂贵的私人保单,来重复他们已经获得的保障。
Unlike some advocates for Medicare for All, El-Sayed says his plan would not entail prohibiting duplicative private insurance. But as People’s Policy Project founder Matt Bruenig has pointed out in Jacobin , that’s effectively a sleight of hand. After a public plan emerges and many employers drop coverage of health insurance, it’s unlikely that people will be able to, or inclined to, purchase expensive private policies that duplicate coverage they’re already guaranteed.
此外,布鲁尼格指出,私人保险如果仍然存在,其面貌很可能大不相同。埃尔-赛义德的计划是否在形式上允许私人保险,其实并不是问题的关键——但他“不想拿走任何东西”的立场,必定能让怀疑者更容易接受这一主张。
Moreover, private insurance would likely look quite different, if it still existed, Bruenig notes. Whether El-Sayed’s plan would formally allow private insurance is not really the issue — but his position that he doesn’t want to take anything away must make the idea go down easier for the skeptics.
埃尔-赛义德因自信地将以色列对加沙人的待遇称为“种族灭绝”,并反对对以色列无条件援助而受到广泛关注。但在市政厅会议和新闻采访中,他的大部分外交政策信息并未聚焦以色列。在这些场合,他更一般性地抨击军国主义,并主张美国应把支出重点放在国内。
El-Sayed has garnered a lot of attention for confidently characterizing Israel’s treatment of Gazans as a “genocide ” and opposing unconditional aid to Israel . But the bulk of his foreign policy messaging during town halls and press interviews hasn’t focused on Israel. In those contexts, he has more generally called out militarism and argued that the U.S. should focus on spending at home.

埃尔-赛义德于2026年10月18日抵达底特律,出席由北中西部地区木工工会理事会和密歇根州民主党主办的投票动员集会并向与会者发表讲话。Quinn Banks 为《MS NOW》摄他在卡罗的言论——“缴税不应该这么难,明明这笔钱是用来给你和你的孩子,而不是把炸弹投向别人和他们的孩子”——具有跨党派吸引力。通过这句话,埃尔-赛义德同时将外交冒险主义与国内社会服务的削减联系起来;通过指向无辜者被杀,作出道德判断;而且由于他没有点名任何国家,他既批评了美国对以色列的支持,也批评了美国与伊朗的战争。
El-Sayed arrives to speak to attendees at a Get Out the Vote Rally hosted by the Northern Midwest Regional Council of Carpenters and the Michigan Democratic Party in Detroit on Oct. 18, 2026. Quinn Banks for MS NOW The remark he made in Caro — “Shouldn’t be this hard to pay your taxes and know that that money’s going to be spent on you and your kids instead of dropping bombs on somebody else and their kids” — has cross-partisan appeal. With it, El-Sayed simultaneously connected foreign policy adventurism to depleted social services at home; issued a moral judgment by directing attention to the killing of innocents; and, because he didn’t name any countries, he condemned the U.S. backing Israel and the U.S. war with Iran simultaneously.
对政治光谱上厌战的人群都有所触动。这种表述似乎在我采访的许多选民中产生共鸣,其中一些人赞同他在伊朗或加沙问题上的立场,而许多人则表示赞同埃尔-赛义德的外交政策“把密歇根放在首位”。
There was something there for war-averse people across the political spectrum. That framing seemed to resonate with many voters I spoke to, some of whom approved of his position on Iran or Gaza, while many others said they approved of how El-Sayed’s foreign policy “put Michigan first.”
埃尔-赛义德正在投放电视广告,引用《底特律自由报》的一句话,指出他“以美国优先的视角看待外交政策”。他还意外获得了右翼评论员塔克·卡尔森的支持,后者将他的外交政策观点形容为“特朗普式”。
El-Sayed is running TV ads featuring a quote from the Detroit Free Press noting that he “Views foreign policy through an America First lens.”And he has found an unlikely supporter in right-wing pundit Tucker Carlson , who has described his outlook on foreign policy as “Trumpian.”
我问埃尔-赛义德,他是否想与“美国优先”立场划等号,还是说其他价值观构成了他的外交世界观。“我绝对是美国优先,”埃尔-赛义德说。“但我真正的价值观是,我相信国际法,并认为我们需要作为平等者中的首位来执行国际法。”
I asked El-Sayed if he wanted to be associated with an America First position, or if he would say other values inform his foreign policy worldview. “I definitely am America first,” El-Sayed said. “But my real value is I believe in international law, and I believe we need to be the first among equals to enforce international law.”
这带来了一些棘手的问题和矛盾。执行国际法似乎与专注于美国国内事务的想法相悖。他还坚持“支持乌克兰的责任”。这并非“让美国再次伟大”阵营的“美国优先”拥护者所希望看到的。但埃尔-赛义德世界观的这部分并未出现在他的竞选信息中,据我与选民的交谈,似乎也没有太多传导给选民。
That poses some vexing questions and contradictions. Enforcing international law would seem to cut against the idea of focusing exclusively on American affairs. And he insisted on a “responsibility to support Ukraine.”That’s not what MAGA America First advocates want . But this part of El-Sayed’s worldview doesn’t feature in his messaging and doesn’t seem to be trickling through as much to voters, based on my conversations.
谈到犯罪问题时,埃尔-赛义德把自己定位为既维护现状又推动改革的倡导者。像社会主义者、纽约市长佐赫兰·马姆达尼一样,埃尔-赛义德翻转了此前对“削减警费”的支持。在贝城,一位选民结合同龄人遭遇的未破谋杀案,询问刑事司法改革。埃尔-赛义德强调“每个人都应该能平安回家”——社区居民和警察皆是如此,并谈到为警方提供资金,以保障“招募、留任和退休”。他补充说,还应投资社区暴力干预和心理健康响应服务。换句话说:给警察拨款,同时也给替代警务模式拨款。
When crime came up at the town halls, El-Sayed positioned himself as an advocate for both the status quo and reform. Like socialist New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, El-Sayed has flipped on his previous support of “defund the police .”At Bay City, a voter asked about criminal justice reform in light of an unsolved murder of her peers. El-sayed emphasized “everybody should get to come home safely” — community members and police — and he spoke about funding the police in order to protect “recruitment, retention, and retirement.”He added that there should also be investment in community violence intervention and mental health response services. In other words: Fund the police and alternatives to policing.
当我问他是否反对“削减警费”这一口号还是政策时,他说:“这是个蠢主意,也是蠢口号。”虽然进步左派中一些刑事司法改革支持者会对埃尔-赛义德全力支持警务的转向有意见,但他的增量式改革路径有潜力同时吸引进步派和非进步派。
When I asked if he took issue with “defund the police” as rhetoric or policy, he said, “It was a dumb idea and dumb rhetoric.”While some proponents of criminal justice reform on the progressive left will take issue with El-Sayed’s turn to full-throated support for policing, his additive approach to reform has the potential to appeal to progressives and nonprogressives alike.

2026年10月18日,来自密歇根州霍利的9岁女孩泽尔达·科尼希在一次竞选活动中向埃尔-赛义德和美国众议员阿亚娜·普雷斯利提问。Quinn Banks为MS NOW拍摄这一切能否汇聚成一张获胜的选票?埃尔-赛义德将进步政治校准至铁锈地带的做法,似乎足以引起选民共鸣,使他能够保持领先,但他的领先优势比该州民主党州长候选人领先其共和党对手的优势要小。
Nine-year-old Zelda Cornish from Holly, Michigan, asks El-Sayed and U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley a question during a campaign event on Oct. 18, 2026. Quinn Banks for MS NOW Will all of this come together for a winning ticket? El-Sayed’s calibration of progressive politics to the Rust Belt seem to be resonating enough with voters that he’s been able to maintain a lead, but his lead is narrower than the Democratic gubernatorial candidate’s lead over her Republican opponent in this state.
他在筹款方面大幅领先对手,但罗杰斯是前七届联邦众议员,拥有特朗普的背书和相当高的知名度。埃尔-赛义德努力让自己的竞选活动吸引各个政治光谱上的人群,但这并不意味着他们会忽视他的党派归属或摒弃种族偏见。他很容易就会输掉选举。
He is massively outraising his opponent, but Rogers is a former seven-term U.S. representative with Trump’s backing and significant name recognition. El-Sayed has labored to make his campaign appealing to people across the political spectrum, but that doesn’t mean that they will overlook his party affiliation or discard racial prejudice. He could easily lose.
民主党基本盘对他而言并非完全稳操胜券。埃尔-赛义德在初选中在黑人选民中的表现疲软,他们是否会大量出来为他投票,是一个可能决定选情的悬而未决的问题。战略家和记者指出,密歇根州阿拉伯社区与黑人社区之间的紧张关系是埃尔-赛义德面临的一个问题。但主要问题可能与种族关系不大,而更多关乎意识形态。
The Democratic base is not entirely a lock for him. El-Sayed was weak with Black voters in the primary, and whether they will turn out in large numbers for him is an open question that could decide the race. Tensions between the Arab and Black community in Michigan have been cited by strategists and reporters as an issue for El-Sayed. But the main issue may have less to do with race than with ideology.
密歇根州立大学政治学家格罗斯曼告诉我:“他与黑人选民的许多问题,不一定是黑人选民特有的。在民主党内部,黑人选民实际上更倾向于认同自己为温和派或保守派,也更可能对桑德斯那一派持怀疑态度。”
“A lot of his issues with Black voters are not necessarily specific to Black voters,” Grossmann, the Michigan State political scientist, told me. “Within the Democratic Party, Black voters are actually more likely to identify as moderate or conservative, and more likely to be skeptical of the Bernie wing of the party.”
这场竞选的赌注极高。结果不仅将对谁控制参议院起决定性作用,还将塑造关于2028年大选的讨论。据《纽约时报》获得的一份录音显示,正在考虑竞选总统的众议员亚历山德拉·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯(民主党-纽约州)在10月的一场纽约筹款活动上表示,埃尔-赛义德是进步运动“代际工程”的一部分,有助于“打破版图”。她补充道:“如果阿卜杜勒能在密歇根州获胜,任何人都能在任何地方获胜。”
The stakes of this race are exceptionally high. The outcome will not only be crucial in determining who controls the Senate, but will also shape conversations about 2028. According to a recording obtained by The New York Times , Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y., who is considering a presidential run, said at a New York fundraiser in October that El-Sayed is part of a “generational project” for the progressive movement that could help “break the map.”She added, “If Abdul can win in Michigan, anybody can win anywhere.”
毫无疑问,埃尔-赛义德竞选的结果将被用来论证像奥卡西奥-科尔特斯这样的民主社会主义者真有机会赢得白宫——或者粉碎这一论点。但这场竞争中一个主要的干扰变量是,埃尔-赛义德因其身份面临独特的障碍。
Undoubtedly, the outcome of El-Sayed’s race will be used to make the case that a democratic socialist like Ocasio-Cortez has a real chance at winning the White House — or shatter the argument. But a major confounding variable in this contest is that El-Sayed faces unique obstacles due to his identity.
鉴于密歇根州的民调显示存在针对穆斯林的真实偏见,且特朗普曾两次赢下该州,我询问埃尔-赛义德,在伊斯兰恐惧症泛滥的环境下,以进步派穆斯林身份参选是否要求过高。他是否曾想过向中间靠拢?
Given that polls in Michigan detect real bias against Muslims and that Trump has won the state twice, I asked El-Sayed whether running as a progressive Muslim in an environment of rampant Islamophobia was asking too much. Had he been tempted to move toward the center?
“我不欺骗选民,”他说,“我会告诉他们我的信念。我不会因为我的身份而在门口放弃我的理想。这正是人们厌恶政治的原因。我就是我。我会告诉你我的信念。如果你同意,就投我一票。”
“I don’t lie to people,” he said. “I tell them what I believe. I’m not willing to check my ideals at the door because of my identity. That’s what people hate about politics. I am who I am. I’ll tell you what I believe. If you agree with me, vote for me.”
他补充道:“即使他们可能永远不愿因我的名字而投票给我,也许等到我的公共服务生涯结束时,他们会对美国是什么有稍微不同的看法。因为美国一直是一个尽管存在差异、人们仍聚在一起、共同建设独自无法完成事业的地方。我信仰这一点。”
He added, “Even if they might never want to vote for me because of my name, maybe by the end of my public service, they’ll think a little bit differently about what America is. Because America’s always been a place where people come together despite our differences to build together what we can’t alone. I believe in that.”