今夏，来自全美各州的检察长与 Meta 达成 170 亿美元和解，该金额创下前所未有的纪录。但上周新墨西哥州一名法官的裁决让这一数字大幅失色。法官下令 Meta 支付 250 亿美元，以解决关于 Meta 在 2018 年剑桥分析公司丑闻及相关事件中误导用户的指控。其他大多数州已通过和解解决了类似指控。这一结果引出一个显而易见的问题：这些州是本该要求更多赔偿？
When attorneys general from across the US announced a $17 billion settlement with Meta this summer, the sum was unprecedented. But a ruling last week by a New Mexico judge blew that number out of the water. The judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion to resolve claims that Meta misled users around the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal and related incidents. Similar claims were resolved by the settlement with most other states. The outcome raised an obvious question: Should these states have asked for more?
答案取决于多种因素的综合考量，包括这项 250 亿美元的判决能否经受住 Meta 的法律挑战。Meta 首席法务官……
The answer depends on a mix of factors, including whether the $25 billion order stands up to Meta's legal challenges. Meta's chief legal of …