字号·· | 护眼
美国消费者新闻与商业频道

美国法官驳回特朗普政府针对哈佛招生调查的诉讼U.S. judge dismisses Trump administration's Harvard admissions probe case

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

美国联邦法官周一驳回了唐纳德·特朗普总统政府提起的一项诉讼,该诉讼旨在强迫哈佛大学移交记录,以调查其是否仍在学生招生过程中考量种族因素。

A federal judge dismissed on Monday a lawsuit by President Donald Trump's administration seeking to force Harvard University to turn over records for an investigation into whether it continues to consider race in its student admissions process.

美国马萨诸塞州联邦地区法官Myong Joun驳回了美国司法部的诉讼。哈佛大学主张,该诉讼是这位共和党总统政府针对这所常春藤盟校发起的更广泛运动的一部分。

US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston rejected the US Department of Justice's lawsuit, which Harvard contends was filed as part of a broader campaign by the Republican president's administration against the Ivy League school.

法官强调,他的裁决基于狭窄的程序性理由,并未解决司法部和美国教育部最终能否寻求数千名申请哈佛大学的高中生数据这一问题。

The judge stressed that his decision rested on narrow, procedural grounds and did not resolve whether the Justice Department and US Department of Education could ultimately seek data on thousands of high school students who sought admission at Harvard.

Joun法官是民主党总统乔·拜登的任命者,他同意哈佛大学的观点,即司法部在起诉前未采取所有法律要求的步骤,以寻求哈佛大学自愿遵守其对申请人层面数据的要求。

But Joun, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, agreed with Harvard that the Justice Department sued without taking all legally required steps aimed at securing the university's voluntary compliance with its demands for applicant-level data.

他写道:“例如,起诉状并未指控司法部已告知哈佛大学,若其不遵守,将采取何种行动——即诉讼——起诉状也未指控具体认定的违规行为。”司法部和哈佛大学均未立即回应置评请求。

"For example, the complaint does not allege that DOJ informed Harvard of the action it would take — namely, litigation — should Harvard fail to comply, nor does the complaint allege the specific failure identified," Joun wrote. The Justice Department and Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

哈佛大学一直是该政府利用联邦资金和政府权力,迫使特朗普声称被“激进左派”意识形态主导的大学进行变革的首要目标。

Harvard has been a top target of the administration's effort to leverage federal funding and government power to force changes at universities that Trump says are dominated by "radical left" ideologies.

这所位于马萨诸塞州剑桥市的大学此前已获得其他法官的裁决,驳回了政府终止超过20亿美元拨款、禁止该校招收国际学生以及以涉嫌未能保护犹太和以色列学生免受骚扰为由起诉该校的努力。

The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university has already secured rulings from other judges rejecting the administration's efforts to terminate over $2 billion in grants, block the school from hosting international students and sue it for allegedly failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students from harassment.

美国司法部于2月在Joun法官面前提起诉讼,主张哈佛大学未配合调查,以确定其是否遵守美国最高法院2023年在一起涉及该校拒绝使用旨在提高少数族裔学生入学率的种族敏感招生计划的案件中作出的裁决。

The Justice Department filed the case before Joun in February, arguing Harvard was not complying with investigations into whether it is following the US Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in a case involving the school rejecting race-conscious admissions programs used to boost enrollment of minority students.

政府表示,需要多年的申请人层面招生数据,以判断种族是否仍是哈佛招生决策的一个因素,以及该大学是否遵守了1964年《民权法案》第六章,该章禁止教育项目中的种族歧视。

The administration said it needed years of applicant-level admissions data to determine whether race remains a factor in Harvard's admissions decisions and if the university is complying with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars racial discrimination in education programs.

哈佛大学上周发布的数据显示,自最高法院禁止种族敏感招生以来,黑人本科生入学比例已连续第三年下降,2030届为9.3%,低于2029届的11.5%。

Data released by Harvard last week showed Black undergraduate enrollment fell for a third straight year since the Supreme Court barred race-conscious admissions, dropping to 9.3% in the class of 2030 from 11.5% in the class of 2029.

该校律师反驳称,提起诉讼是为了报复哈佛拒绝接受要求其改革治理、招聘和学术项目以配合政府议程的要求。

The university's lawyers countered that the case was filed to retaliate against Harvard for refusing demands that it overhaul its governance, hiring and academic programs to align with the administration's agenda.

他们表示,诉讼是在特朗普于2月初宣布结束和解谈判、并要求哈佛支付10亿美元赔偿金之后提起的,特朗普称哈佛“长期以来表现非常恶劣”。Joun法官周一驳回案件时强调,他并未裁决哈佛是否存在歧视,也未裁决其最终是否可能被要求向相关机构提供数据。他表示,如果司法部采取进一步行政步骤,仍可尝试再次提起类似诉讼。

They said the lawsuit was filed after Trump announced in early February that he was ending settlement talks and wanted $1 billion in damages from Harvard, which he said had "been, for a long time, behaving very badly." Joun, in dismissing the case on Monday, stressed that he was not resolving whether Harvard has discriminated or if it may ultimately be required to provide data to the agencies. The Justice Department could try to pursue a similar case again if it takes additional administrative steps, he said.

阅读媒体原文 ↗