据《经济时报》报道，在特朗普实施签证限制政策的情况下，越来越多来自印度的科技行业员工正从美国返回自己的祖国。根据Xpheno收集的数据，截至2026年9月，已有约12,700名印度科技专家完成了这一迁移过程；这一数字有望超过去年记录的最高峰值（15,100人）。过去几年中，这一趋势持续增长：2023年为7,200人，2024年增至9,800人。如果这种趋势继续下去，印度可能会出现更多科技人才从美国回流而非移民到美国的情况。
Amid Trump's visa crackdown, an increasing proportion of technology sector employees originating from India are relocating from the US to their country of origin, reported The Economic Times. Approximately 12,700 specialists had completed this transition by September 2026, positioning the year to potentially exceed the last year's documented peak of 15,100 departures, according to information compiled by Xpheno. The figures have demonstrated consistent growth throughout the preceding years, rising from 7,200 in 2023 to 9,800 in 2024. If this pattern continues, India may experience a scenario wherein more technology professionals are returning from the US rather than emigrating to it.
这种变化的发生，源于人们对特朗普政府未来移民和签证政策的担忧。与此同时，许多企业正在大规模裁员，全球就业市场也处于不稳定状态，这些因素都促使人们做出这样的选择。
This shift is happening as people worry more about what immigration and visa rules might look like under the Trump administration. At the same time, companies are cutting jobs left and right, and the global job market feels pretty shaky, which is pushing people to make this move.
一位领英用户Abhinarayan Mishra指出，从美国返回印度并不是一件容易的事。Mishra强调，印度企业更看重那些在人工智能、云计算、网络安全以及产品管理方面具备专业技能的人才，而不仅仅是他们在海外积累的工作经验。
Indians returning from US to face many challenges LinkedIn user Abhinarayan Mishra shared that heading back to India isn't necessarily a smooth transition. Mishra points out that Indian companies are really focused on hiring people with skills in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and product leadership—rather than just valuing general work experience abroad.
他还提到了一些人们在回国后面临的实际挑战，比如需要同时遵守两国的税收法规，以及帮助他们的 Z 世代子女适应新的教育体系和生活方式。
He also mentioned some real challenges people face when returning, like dealing with tax rules in both countries, plus the tricky part of helping their Gen Z kids adjust to a new education system and lifestyle.
特朗普撤销了超过 30 万个签证：前往美国的印度公民必须了解的事项
多家科技公司的 PERM 申请流程被暂停这一举措是在微软（Microsoft）、Adobe、Infosys、Cognizant、Capgemini、Wipro、HCL Technologies 和 Tata 等全球知名人才招聘公司的 PERM 申请流程被暂停之后发生的。
Trump revokes over 300,000 visas: Here's what Indian nationals travelling to the US must knowPERM process halted for several tech firmsThis development follows the halting of PERM processing for several of the world's most prominent talent acquisition companies, such as Microsoft, Adobe, Infosys, Cognizant, Capgemini, Wipro, HCL Technologies and Tata.PERM, which stands for Program Electronic Review Management, represents a crucial component in the employer-sponsored green card pathway.
“PERM”（Program Electronic Review Management）是雇主赞助的绿卡申请流程中的关键环节。通常情况下，雇主需要证明无法找到符合条件的美国本土工人来担任该职位，并且引进外籍员工不会对美国本土员工的薪酬和工作条件产生负面影响。
Typically, it requires employers to show that qualified, readily available U.S. workers cannot be found for the role and that bringing on an international worker won't negatively impact the compensation and workplace conditions of comparable American employees.
对于那些依赖雇主担保才能获得永久居留权的印度专业人士来说，这一暂停措施可能会推迟他们获得永久居留权的进程。不过，具体影响程度将取决于他们的当前移民身份以及他们的绿卡申请进展情况。
For Indian professionals dependent on employer sponsorship, the suspension may postpone their aspirations to secure permanent residency status. The extent of this impact, nevertheless, will be contingent upon their present immigration classification and the progression of their green card petitions.
移民专家的观点根据移民专家 Swatilina Barik 的说法，根据美国媒体的报道，这项措施并不会撤销目前有效的 H-1B 签证或已经获得批准的绿卡。它只是限制了受影响的公司提交新的 PERM 申请，并暂停了正在审核中的申请。Barik 进一步强调，这一举措应被视为对基于雇佣关系的永久居留制度的限制，而非对临时工作签证授权的直接终止。
Immigration expert weighs inAccording to immigration specialist Swatilina Barik, this measure does not revoke currently valid H-1B visas or invalidate green cards that have received prior approval, as per American Bazaar. It rather restricts the affected organizations from submitting new PERM applications and halts applications currently under review during the period of suspension. Barik further emphasized that this development should be interpreted as a constraint on the employment-based permanent residency mechanism rather than a termination of temporary work visa authorization.