字号·· | 护眼
国会山报

科米回应新指控:若非“令人发指的滥用司法部”,简直“滑稽可笑”Comey reacts to new charges: ‘Funny’ if it weren’t ‘appalling abuse’ of DOJ

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

前联邦调查局(FBI)局长詹姆斯·科米周一猛烈抨击特朗普政府对他提出的新指控。

Former FBI Director James Comey on Monday slammed his new charges from the Trump administration.

“他们又回来了,又来一次。若非这是对司法部如此令人发指的滥用——我们不能对此变得麻木——这简直几乎滑稽可笑。我的情况没有任何改变,”科米在周一的 Substack 帖子中写道。

“Well, they’re back, again. It would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice, one that we cannot become numb to. Nothing’s changed with me,” Comey said in a Monday Substack post.

“我依然无辜,我依然不怕这些人,我依然相信独立的联邦司法体系。而且我依然很幸运,拥有一个了不起的家庭和一群出色的律师,他们将在法庭上站出来,对抗最新的指控以及此后可能出现的一切,”这位前 FBI 局长补充道。

“I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid of these people and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. And I’m still lucky to have an amazing family and an incredible group of lawyers that will stand up in court and fight the latest and whatever comes after this,” the former FBI director added.

根据新公开的法庭文件,司法部(DOJ)再次指控科米涉嫌在 10 年前泄露敏感国防信息。

Comey has been charged again by the Department of Justice (DOJ) over allegedly disclosing sensitive national defense information 10 years ago, per newly unsealed court documents.

本月早些时候,这位前 FBI 局长被控两项传递与国防事务相关信息以及共谋传递此类信息的罪名。然而,一名联邦法官周一批准了科米要求公开起诉书的请求。

The former FBI director was charged with two counts of transmitting information and conspiring to transmit information linked to national defense matters earlier this month. However, a federal judge granted Comey’s request to unseal the complaint on Monday.

根据起诉文件,司法部指控科米“通过一名或多名共谋者”指使一名人员在 2016 年 10 月与一家全国性新闻机构的记者分享机密信息。其他法庭文件指出该出版物为《纽约时报》。

The DOJ accuses Comey of, “through one and more co-conspirators” ordering an individual to share classified information with a reporter from a national news organization in Oct. 2016, per the charging document. The New York Times is identified in other court documents as the publication.

这位前 FBI 局长已提出驳回案件的动议,其律师在法庭文件中指出,该泄露事件过去曾由两个不同的美国检察官办公室调查,但双方均未提起指控。

The former FBI director has moved to dismiss the case, with his lawyers noting in court filings that the disclosure had been investigated in the past by two separate U.S. attorney’s offices, with both not bringing charges.

阅读媒体原文 ↗