字号·· | 护眼
海峡时报

蓝潮将如何在特朗普最后两年任期内考验他How a blue wave could test Trump in his final two years

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

民主党可能在11月3日的“浪潮选举”中获益,这可能削弱特朗普对国会的控制,并迫使其面临更多监督、妥协和审查。

Democrats could gain from a possible “wave election” on Nov 3, which may weaken Trump’s control of Congress and force more oversight, compromise and scrutiny.

众议院对民主党而言比参议院更容易赢得。他们需要赢得三个席位才能控制众议院,但需要四个席位才能控制参议院,而在参议院,阻挠议事和60票规则至关重要。

The House looks easier for Democrats to win than the Senate. They need three seats for the House, but four for the Senate, where the filibuster and 60-vote rule matter.

如果民主党赢得一院或两院控制权,他们可以阻挠特朗普的法案、发起调查并拖延提名人选的确认。特朗普仍可通过行政命令和否决权行事。

If Democrats win one or both chambers, they could block Trump’s bills, launch investigations and slow nominees. Trump can still act through executive orders and vetoes.

AI生成 华盛顿——在第二个任期中,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普迄今受益于其共和党同时掌控参众两院多数席位,这与他在白宫第一个任期前半段的情况相同。

AI generated WASHINGTON – In his second term, US President Donald Trump has so far benefited from his Republican Party holding majorities in both houses of Congress, as he did in the top half of his first turn in the White House.

当一个政党同时控制总统职位和国会时,雄心勃勃的立法可以成为法律,这一点从2017年和2025年特朗普任内通过的减税法案便可得到证明。

When one party controls both the presidency and Congress, ambitious legislation can become law, as evidenced by the tax-cut measures enacted under Trump in 2017 and 2025.

而且,由党内忠诚分子掌管国会委员会,使总统政府在一定程度上免受来自这些机构的严厉审查。

And with party faithful running congressional committees, a presidential administration is insulated, to some extent, from tough scrutiny from such bodies.

如今,公众对特朗普工作表现的不满威胁着要在11月3日的国会选举中,让共和党的一党执政局面戛然而止。

Now, public disapproval of Trump’s job performance threatens to bring the one-party Republican government to a crashing halt in the Nov 3 congressional elections.

一场有利于民主党的“浪潮选举”,将在特朗普白宫任期的最后两年,让其政府面临更严格的监督,并迫使其若想推行立法,就必须接受妥协。与此同时,总统无需国会也能做很多事。

A “wave election” that breaks in favour of the Democrats would, in Trump’s final two years in the White House, expose his administration to greater oversight and force it to accept compromise if it wants to enact legislation. At the same time, there’s a lot a president can do without Congress.

特朗普已经通过发布广泛的行政命令(其中一些已被法院推翻)以及在未获国会授权的情况下对伊朗发动战争,试探总统权力的边界。什么是“浪潮选举”?

Trump already has tested the bounds of a president’s power by issuing expansive executive orders, including some that have been struck down by the courts, and waging war against Iran without congressional authorisation. What’s a wave election?

没有确切的定义,但该术语用于描述一个政党在众议院、参议院或两院均取得重大席位增长的情况。

There’s no precise definition, but the term is used to describe when a political party makes major gains in the House of Representatives, the Senate or both.

一般而言,国会“波浪选举”通常发生在总统四年任期的中期——此时总统本人不在选票上——并且通常有利于不占据白宫的政党,目前正是民主党。在波浪选举中,最接近的竞选往往会全部朝同一方向倾斜。2026年有多少个席位将进行竞选?

Generally speaking, congressional wave elections have occurred at the midpoint of a president’s four-year term – when the president isn’t on the ballot – and have usually benefited the party that doesn’t occupy the White House, which right now is the Democratic Party. In a wave election, the closest races can tend to break all in the same direction. How many seats are being contested in 2026?

全部435个众议院席位和100个参议院席位中的35个。共和党在众议院以218对214领先。众议院有两个空缺席位。在参议院,共和党以53对47占优。

All 435 House of Representatives seats and 35 of the 100 Senate seats. Republicans hold a 218 to 214 edge in the House. There are two vacant seats in the House. In the Senate, Republicans have a 53-to-47 advantage.

除佛罗里达州和俄亥俄州的特别选举外,全部35场竞选都是为完整的六年任期,这两场特别选举是为填补将于2028年底到期的任期。民主党能否赢得控制权?民主党在赢得众议院控制权方面比在参议院的位置更有利。

All 35 races are for full six-year terms except for special elections in Florida and Ohio to serve out terms that will expire at the end of 2028. Can Democrats win control? The Democrats are better positioned to win control of the House than the Senate.

民主党只需净增三个席位即可在众议院获得多数,并且自特朗普于2025年1月重返白宫以来,在举行的特别选举中表现超出预期。参议院构成更严峻的挑战。

Democrats need a net gain of just three seats for a majority in the House and have over-performed in special elections held since Trump returned to the presidency in January 2025. The Senate poses a steeper challenge.

民主党需要净增四个席位才能获得51个席位的绝对多数,因为副总统J·D·万斯可以在任何50比50的平局中投下决定性一票,使其倾向共和党。

Democrats need a net gain of four seats for a 51-seat outright majority because Vice-President J.D. Vance could break any 50-50 split in favour of Republicans.

民主党可能需要保留其全部或几乎全部13个正在竞选的现有席位,包括在密歇根州、佐治亚州和新罕布什尔州等政治竞争激烈的州。

Democrats would likely have to retain all or almost all of their 13 current seats that are being contested, including in the politically competitive states of Michigan, Georgia and New Hampshire.

在22个有共和党持有席位参选的州中,除缅因州和北卡罗来纳州外,其余所有州在2024年大选中都支持特朗普超过10个百分点。民主党需要在这些特朗普以两位数优势获胜的州中至少翻转两个。这在竞选周期开始时看起来不太可能,但现在更现实了。

Of the 22 states with Republican-held seats on the ballot, all but Maine and North Carolina favoured Trump by more than 10 percentage points in the 2024 election. Democrats would need to flip at least two of those double-digit Trump states. That looked unlikely at the start of the campaign cycle but is more realistic now.

强有力的候选人招募和反特朗普政治环境,使民主党在阿拉斯加、爱荷华州、堪萨斯州、俄亥俄州和德克萨斯州等一系列传统上倾向共和党的州中具有高度竞争力。波浪是如何产生的?

Strong candidate recruitment and an anti-Trump political environment have made Democrats highly competitive in a raft of traditionally Republican-leaning states such as Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Ohio and Texas. Why do waves happen?

一种理论认为,愤怒能激发公民,因此反对总统及其政策的人比对现状满意的人更有动力去投票。

One theory is that anger energises citizens, so those opposed to the President and his policies are more motivated to turn out at the polls than those happy with the status quo.

反弹可能非常严重:自第二次世界大战结束以来,总统所在政党在中期选举中平均净损失约25个众议院席位和3.5个参议院席位。民调和预测市场怎么说?民调显示,大多数公众对国家的方向以及对总统深感不满。

The backlash can be severe: Since the end of World War II, the president’s party on average has suffered a net loss of about 25 House seats and 3.5 Senate seats in midterm elections. What are polls and prediction markets saying? Polls suggest that most of the public is deeply dissatisfied with the direction of the country and with the President.

特朗普的支持率——截至10月30日,《纽约时报》每日民调平均值为37%——是二战以来任何总统中最低的之一,并可与共和党人乔治·W·布什在2006年选举日盖洛普民调中的38%支持率相媲美,当时民主党赢得了布什总统任期最后两年众议院和参议院的多数席位。总统越不受欢迎,其所在政党倾向于失去的席位就越多。

Trump’s approval rating – 37% in a New York Times average of daily polls as at Oct 30 – is one of the lowest of any president since World War II and comparable to Republican George W. Bush’s 38% approval rating in a Gallup Poll on Election Day 2006, when Democrats won majorities in both the House and Senate for the final two years of Bush’s presidency. The less popular the president, the more seats his party tends to lose.

民调显示,民主党在选民热情方面领先于共和党,并在一个询问选民支持哪个党派参加即将举行的选举的泛型国会选票问题上领先。

Polls show Democrats leading Republicans in voter enthusiasm and in a generic congressional ballot question that asks voters which party they support in the upcoming election.

预测市场Polymarket和Kalshi指向民主党大胜,给予该党超过90%的几率赢得众议院控制权,以及大约三分之二的几率赢得参议院多数席位。国会民主党胜利对立法意味着什么?

Prediction markets Polymarket and Kalshi point to a Democratic sweep, giving the party better than 90% odds of winning control of the House and about a two-thirds chance of securing a Senate majority. What would Democratic victories in Congress mean for legislation?

即使只有一个议院易手,特朗普让国会通过民主党反对的立法的能力也将受挫。

Even if control of only one chamber flips, Trump’s ability to get Congress to pass legislation opposed by Democrats would be thwarted.

一项法案必须经众议院和参议院批准,才能送到总统办公桌上签署成法或被否决。因此,任何一个议院的联合民主党多数都能阻止任何法案。

A Bill must be approved by both the House and Senate before it is sent to the president’s desk to be signed into law or vetoed. So a united Democratic majority in either chamber would be able to block any Bill.

出于同样的原因,仅控制一个议院不会使民主党能够自行通过立法。

For those same reasons, control of just one chamber wouldn’t enable the Democrats to pass legislation on their own.

即使他们同时夺得众议院和参议院,其这样做的能力也将受到限制。

Their ability to do so would be limited even if they take both the House and Senate.

因为大多数立法在参议院需要超级多数通过,而民主党在本次选举中不太可能实现这一点。

That’s because for most legislation, Senate approval requires a supermajority, which the Democrats are unlikely to achieve in this election.

在参议院,议员享有一种被称为“阻挠议事”的特权,即有权要求无限期辩论以阻挠立法。

In the Senate, members enjoy a privilege known as the filibuster, which is the prerogative to demand never-ending debate to thwart legislation.

在100席的参议院中,需要60票才能结束阻挠议事——因此也需要60票才能通过大多数立法。

It takes 60 votes in the 100-seat Senate to end a filibuster – and thus 60 votes to pass most legislation.

如果民主党掌控国会两院,他们可以通过一种称为预算调和的程序绕过阻挠议事,该程序适用于与支出、税收和联邦债务上限有关的法案,后者是国会对美国政府借贷设定的上限。

With control of both houses of Congress, the Democrats could get around the filibuster using a process called budget reconciliation that’s permitted for Bills relating to spending, taxes and the federal debt limit, which is a cap established by Congress on US government borrowing.

首先,众议院和参议院必须就预算决议达成一致,该决议设定总体支出和收入目标。

First, the House and Senate must agree to a budget resolution, which sets overall spending and revenue targets.

随后,以“调和”税收和支出做法与该预算决议相符名义推进的法案,只需在参议院获得简单多数票即可获批。

Then, Bills advanced in the name of “reconciling” tax and spending practices with that budget resolution need only a simple majority vote to win approval in the Senate.

正是这一程序,使得当时完全控制国会的共和党在特朗普第一任期的2017年以及第二任期的2025年通过了减税法案。当然,特朗普可以否决国会通过的任何法案。

It’s this process that Republicans, then in full control of Congress, used to pass tax cuts in 2017 in Trump’s first term and again in 2025 in his second. Of course, Trump can veto any Bill passed by Congress.

要克服总统否决,需要众议院和参议院均达到三分之二的超级多数,这在本次选举中对民主党而言是难以实现的目标。

To overcome a presidential veto requires a two-thirds supermajority in both the House and Senate, improbable goals for Democrats in this election.

与此同时,如果特朗普否决那些拥有显著公众支持的法案,例如旨在解决选民在选举前关注的可负担性问题的法案,他将面临进一步下滑的支持率风险。

At the same time, were Trump to veto Bills with significant popular support, for example, Bills aimed at addressing issues of affordability that were top of mind for voters going into the election, he would risk further tanking his approval rating.

此类法案的选项包括撤销2025年税法对医疗补助(主要面向贫困人口的政府健康保险计划)的支出削减,以及恢复加强补贴以帮助人们支付健康保险费用。

Options for such Bills would include a reversal of the 2025 tax law’s spending reductions to Medicaid, a government health insurance programme primarily for the poor, and a revival of enhanced subsidies to help people pay for health insurance.

只要愿意妥协,即使一党掌握白宫而另一党控制国会一院或两院,重要立法仍有可能成为法律。

Given a willingness to compromise, significant legislation can become law even when one party has the White House and the other controls one or both chambers of Congress.

例如包括 1983 年的社会保障救助方案、1986 年的大规模税制改革,以及 1996 年对福利制度的全面改革。民主党在国会获胜是否意味着将对特朗普展开新的调查?

Examples include a Social Security rescue package in 1983, a major tax overhaul in 1986, and sweeping changes to the welfare system in 1996. Would Democratic victories in Congress mean new investigations into Trump?

特朗普及其政府很可能面临国会委员会发起的新调查,或是原有调查的重启,这些委届时将转为民主党控制。

Trump and his administration would likely face new or re-energised investigations by congressional committees that would switch to Democratic control.

潜在的调查目标包括特朗普家族的股票交易和加密货币业务、私营公司为特朗普白宫舞厅项目提供资金、政府的移民执法政策,以及其对已故性犯罪者兼金融家杰弗里·爱泼斯坦相关档案的处理方式。然而,国会调查的权力有重要限制。

Potential targets for probes include the Trump family’s stock trading and cryptocurrency ventures, private companies’ funding of Trump’s White House ballroom project, the administration’s immigration enforcement policies, and its handling of files related to the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein. However, the power of congressional investigations has important limits.

国会委员会可以发出传票,试图强制私人公民、企业或政府官员提交文件或作证,并可对拒绝配合者提出国会蔑视罪指控,该罪名可处以罚款和最长 12 个月的监禁。

Congressional committees can issue subpoenas to try to compel private citizens, businesses or government officials to produce documents or testify, and committees can cite those who refuse for criminal contempt of Congress, which is punishable by a fine and imprisonment for up to 12 months.

但虽然国会可以将官员移交司法部进行刑事起诉,却无法自行提起指控。

But while Congress can refer officials to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution, it cannot bring charges itself.

司法部属于行政分支,拥有是否根据移交情况采取行动的自由裁量权,并掌握提起联邦刑事指控的专属权力。特朗普被弹劾是一种可能吗?

The Justice Department, which is part of the executive branch, has discretion over whether to act on a referral and holds the exclusive power to bring federal criminal charges. Is Trump’s impeachment a possibility?

由民主党控制的国会可以对特朗普发起第三次弹劾,但这并非民主党信息传递的重点。弹劾程序始于众议院。

A Congress run by Democrats could pursue a third impeachment of Trump, but it is not a focus of the Democrats’ messaging. The impeachment process starts in the House.

如果众议院以简单多数通过针对总统的弹劾条款,总统即被弹劾,但尚未被免职。

If the House approves articles of impeachment against the president with a simple majority, the president is impeached, though not yet removed from office.

随后参议院举行审判。如果参议院以三分之二多数投票定罪,总统将被免职。

The Senate then holds a trial. If the Senate votes to convict by a two-thirds majority, the president is removed from office.

特朗普在其第一个任期后半段曾被弹劾两次,此前民主党在 2018 年中期选举中赢得了众议院控制权。

Trump was impeached twice in the second half of his first term, after Democrats won control of the House in the 2018 midterms.

2019年12月,众议院以滥用职权和妨碍国会为罪名弹劾了他。

In December 2019, the House impeached him on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

众议院指控总统将对乌克兰的军事援助与其政府对总统政治对手乔·拜登及拜登之子亨特展开调查挂钩。

The House alleged that the President conditioned military aid to Ukraine on its government opening investigations into the President’s political rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son Hunter.

众议院于2021年1月第二次弹劾特朗普,指控他在2021年1月6日国会大厦袭击事件中煽动叛乱,该事件延迟了对拜登在2020年总统选举中胜过特朗普的认证。两次弹劾均未导致参议院定罪。

The House impeached Trump a second time in January 2021, charging him with inciting an insurrection in connection with the Jan 6 attack on the US Capitol, which delayed the certification of Biden’s victory over Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Neither impeachment led to a Senate conviction.

即使民主党人再次发起弹劾,由于参议院需要三分之二多数票才能定罪,他们不太可能成功将特朗普罢免。即便民主党人在参议院取得显著增益,也极不可能达到该门槛。

If Democrats pursue another impeachment, they’re unlikely to successfully remove Trump from office because of the Senate’s requirement of a two-thirds majority vote to secure a conviction. Even if Democrats make significant gains in the chamber, it’s highly improbable they will reach that threshold.

无论如何,党内领袖在2026年选举竞选期间已淡化弹劾情景,并敦促候选人以降低日常生活成本、减轻工薪家庭经济负担为竞选纲领。特朗普的任命权将如何受到影响?

In any case, party leaders have downplayed an impeachment scenario during the 2026 election campaign and urged their candidates to run on a platform of lowering everyday living costs and easing economic burdens for working families. How would Trump’s ability to make appointments be affected?

由民主党控制的参议院可能会拖延或阻止特朗普的司法和行政提名。

A Democratic-run Senate could stall or block Trump’s judicial and executive nominees.

需要参议院确认的总统任命包括内阁成员、最高法院和联邦法官、大使以及政府机构和委员会的负责人。

Among the presidential appointees that require Senate confirmation are Cabinet members, Supreme Court and federal judges, ambassadors and the heads of government agencies and commissions.

参议院的共和党控制使特朗普得以(仅勉强)确认了一批有争议的人选,包括皮特·赫格塞特担任国防部长、罗伯特·F·肯尼迪 Jr.担任卫生与公共服务部长,以及卡什·帕特尔担任联邦调查局局长。

Republican control of the Senate enabled Trump to win confirmation – just barely – of a number of controversial figures, including Pete Hegseth as defence secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health and human services secretary, and Kash Patel as Federal Bureau of Investigation director.

在第二任期内官员的更迭比第一任期少,但如果特朗普需要参议院民主党人批准其人选,他在填补空缺时的回旋余地将大幅减少。没有国会,特朗普还能做什么?总统可以通过行政行动在不经国会的情况下实施重大政策变动。

There’s been less turnover among officials in his second administration than in his first, but Trump would have considerably less leeway filling vacancies if he needs Senate Democrats to okay his picks. What can Trump do without Congress? The president can enact significant policy changes without Congress through executive action.

特朗普已下令对伊朗进行军事打击,实施并取消关税,解雇大批联邦雇员,撤出美国对世界卫生组织以及2015年国际气候协定《巴黎协定》的参与,并将长期担任委内瑞拉总统的尼古拉斯·马杜罗抓捕并带到美国——全部未经过国会立法程序。

Trump has ordered military strikes on Iran, imposed and removed tariffs, fired large swaths of the federal workforce, withdrawn the US from the World Health Organization and the 2015 international climate treaty the Paris Agreement, and seized and extracted long-time Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to the US – all without legislative action from Congress.

Checkmate Government Relations的管理合伙人、与特朗普政府关系密切的说客切斯·麦克道尔表示,无论中期选举结果如何,特朗普仍将是华盛顿的权力中心。

Ches McDowell, managing partner of Checkmate Government Relations and a lobbyist with close ties to the Trump administration, said Trump will remain the centre of power in Washington regardless of the outcome of the midterms.

麦克道尔在10月21日彭博政府高管晚宴圆桌会上说:“我们一直在告诉客户,行政当局仍将是推动任何事务的主要机构,无论民主党是否夺取众议院和参议院。”共和党人是否担心失去多数席位?

“We’ve been telling clients, the administration is still going to be the primary body to get anything done, no matter if the Democrats take the House and the Senate,” McDowell said at a Bloomberg Government executive dinner roundtable on Oct 21. Are Republicans worried about losing their majorities?

是的,尽管党内领袖很少公开表达担忧,因为他们不想打击选民和捐助者的士气。

Yes, though party leaders rarely convey worry publicly because they don’t want to dispirit their voters and donors.

众议院议长、共和党人迈克·约翰逊一再表示,他的党将“违背历史”,继续掌控议院。

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a Republican, has repeatedly said his party will “defy history” and keep control of the chamber.

参议员蒂姆·斯科特负责参议院共和党竞选组织,他在9月30日对记者说:“我们将毫无疑问地保持参议院多数”,但他也指出参议院竞争选区的数量创下纪录,并承认堪萨斯州和内布拉斯加州等传统共和党倾向州的选情十分紧张。

Senator Tim Scott, who leads the Senate Republicans’ campaign organisation, told reporters on Sept 30 that “we will hold the Senate majority, without question,” though he said there are a “record number” of toss-up Senate races and acknowledged tight races in traditionally Republican-leaning states such as Kansas and Nebraska.

特朗普在罕见地承认自己在选民中的支持度疲软时,于9月30日表示,他“在解释国家表现良好方面做得非常糟糕”。

Trump, in a rare acknowledgement of his weak standing with voters, said on Sept 30 that he’s “done a very bad job of explaining how good the country is doing”.

北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员、未寻求连任的汤姆·蒂利斯在10月6日出版的书中写道,他预计该党将在11月3日的选举中出现“一场血腥屠宰”。

Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who’s not seeking re-election, said in his book released on Oct 6 that he expected a “bloodbath” for his party on Nov 3.

共和党超级政治行动委员会(超级政治行动委员会)在捍卫本党把控的州和选区上投入的资金,远多于争夺民主党把持席位的资金,而这些州和选区中有许多在2024年大选中强力支持特朗普。

Republican super political action committees (PACs) are spending much more to defend their own states and districts, many of which strongly favoured Trump in the 2024 election, than they are on contesting Democratic-held seats.

10月初,捍卫共和党参议院多数席位的主要超级政治行动委员会撤出了北卡罗来纳州——民主党极有可能从共和党手中赢下该州的一个席位——转而将资源调往倾向共和党的堪萨斯州、密西西比州和南卡罗来纳州的竞选中。共和党是否拥有任何优势?

In early October, the leading super-PAC defending the Senate Republican majority pulled out of North Carolina, where Democrats are likely to win a seat from Republicans, and instead shifted resources to races in Republican-leaning Kansas, Mississippi and South Carolina. Do Republicans have any advantages?

是的。近几个月来,七个州——阿拉巴马州、佛罗里达州、路易斯安那州、北卡罗来纳州、俄亥俄州、田纳西州和得克萨斯州——采用了更有利于共和党的选区划分地图。

Yes. In recent months, seven states – Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas – have adopted a more Republican-skewing electoral district map.

部分州份是在2026年4月美国最高法院限制利用《投票权法案》划分以黑人和西班牙裔为主的选区后采取行动的。

Some acted after the US Supreme Court in April 2026 curtailed the use of the Voting Rights Act to draw predominantly black and Hispanic districts.

然而,一场民主党“浪潮”可能会大幅限制共和党原本指望通过重新划分选区获得的收益。此外,民主党针对全国范围内共和党主导的选区重划进行报复,在加利福尼亚州推出了自己的党派地图,并且根据新的法院批准地图,他们极有可能在犹他州从共和党手中夺走一个席位。

However, a Democratic “wave” could significantly limit the gains Republicans had expected to make through redistricting. Also, Democrats retaliated against Republican-led redistricting across the country with a partisan map of their own in California, and they’re likely to wrest one seat in Utah from Republican control under a new court-approved map.

共和党的另一项优势:该党的政治行动委员会普遍比民主党对手更加资金充裕。

Another Republican advantage: The party’s PAC generally are more cash-flush than their Democratic counterparts.

截至9月初,亲特朗普的“让美国再次伟大”超级政治行动委员会账面资金超过4.15亿美元(约5.31亿新元),共和党全国委员会拥有超过1亿美元的现金优势,领先于民主党全国委员会。

The pro-Trump MAGA Inc super-PAC had more than US$415 million (S$531 million) in the bank as at early September, and the Republican National Committee had a cash advantage of more than US$100 million over the Democratic National Committee.

不过,超级政治行动委员会购买广告的费率高于联邦候选人,有利的政治环境可以抵消对手的资金优势。彭博社

However, super-PACs pay higher advertising rates than federal candidates, and a favourable political environment can neutralise the opposition’s cash advantage. BLOOMBERG

阅读媒体原文 ↗