Shock waves from the Democratic blue tsunami cascaded through global energy markets on Wednesday. The impacts from a midterm rout that swept Democrats into power in the House and Senate, while ending Republican rule in at least five governors’ mansions, is coming into focus after a historic election bludgeoned President Donald Trump’s party and its policies. The effects are shocking.

The AI race, which is powering the U.S. economy and sending electricity demand soaring, suddenly faces major roadblocks. Democrats who have promised to impose moratoriums on data centers won gubernatorial elections in key states like Texas, Ohio and Georgia. The banking giant, Allianz, reckons that 47 gigawatts of planned data center projects now face moratorium risks.

Manufacturers in Asia wondered if the electoral outcome would lead to a slowdown in orders for semiconductors, batteries and transformers. In Europe, many leaders celebrated Democrats’ victory, even as they expressed limited hope for a change in U.S. climate and tariff policy.

A new generation of Democrats is bound for Washington. They are less focused on climate change and more focused on affordability and rooting out corruption. POLITICO reviewed the victory speeches of 10 Democrats in key Senate races. None mentioned climate change directly, though Michigan Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed pledged to defend voters from “air too putrid to breathe” and Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff referenced “a poisoned planet.”Questions over the Iran war loom large over energy markets. The decision to escalate or deescalate remains with Trump, despite Democrats’ big win. The conflict is the biggest factor in determining the price of oil, gasoline and diesel.

Tuesday’s winners include a pastor from Kansas, a seminarian from Texas, a pediatrician from South Carolina and a logger from Maine. All four flipped Republican-held Senate seats.

These are not the “Resistance” Democrats that absconded to the United Nations climate talks during Trump’s first term. Nor are they seeking to resurrect the Biden administration’s “whole of government” approach to combating rising temperatures.

Instead, they punched a ticket to Washington by persuading voters in deeply red states that they will address rising costs, get money out of politics and work with Republicans.

“I will be a brick wall between Washington, D.C., and South Carolina, even when it means standing up to my own party,” South Carolina Sen.-elect Annie Andrews said in her victory speech.

"I want to be Jerry Moran's best friend", Kansas Sen.-elect Adam Hamilton told supporters, referring to the state’s senior Republican senator.

In most victory speeches, energy barely registered. Climate change wasn’t mentioned. Take Texas Sen.-elect James Talarico, who ran on a pledge to rein in data center development and support renewable energy — and oil and gas.

He scarcely touched on the subject Tuesday evening, saying only, “Hate can't lower our energy bills." Even in the few races where more progressive Democrats prevailed, energy was framed as a cost-of-living issue. Ohio Sen.-elect Sherrod Brown blamed rising energy costs on Big Tech, data centers and the Iran war. In Michigan, El-Sayed focused his energy message on the war’s effect on energy prices "They might have been pointing to my name and my faith, but we all know that my name and my faith aren't the reason you can't afford your gas,” El-Sayed, who will become the nation’s first Muslim senator, said in his victory speech.

The lack of climate mentions did little to dent the enthusiasm of Democrats' loudest climate advocates. The party is likely to ramp up efforts to expand clean energy, especially at the state level where Democrats are poised to seize full control of governments in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee told POLITICO.

“I think all of these winning candidates shared, to some degree, four central arguments: cost, corruption, chaos, and clean energy,” said Inslee, whose climate policies became a template for Democrats when former President Joe Biden won the White House in 2020. “We're going to have people who understand the nature both of the opportunities of getting cheaper energy and cleaner energy.”

The Nasdaq and Dow were up in morning trading, a reflection of Trump’s acceptances of the results, analysts said. Hyperscalers Amazon, Apple and Microsoft were all up.

But warning signs for the data center boom lurked beneath those headline figures. AI stocks like SpaceX, NVIDIA, and Oracle were down, underscoring the threats data centers face from another group of winners: new Democratic governors.

The most consequential of those is Gov.-elect Gina Hinojosa in Texas, who is now poised to lead what could soon become the country’s top data center market. Development had already slowed in Texas after Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, called for an audit on data centers. Many analysts had expected Abbott to relax those measures if he prevailed Tuesday. Instead he lost to Hinojosa, raising the prospect that the pause will be longer.

“She has called for a day one moratorium until the Texas legislative body acts, and I don't know why we wouldn't anticipate that to be her actual action until she says otherwise,” said John Miller, an analyst at TD Cowen.

A slowdown has potentially far reaching economic impacts. The four largest hyperscalers are expected to invest $725 billion in the AI buildout this year, up from $410 billion last year, Allianz wrote in a note to clients. That money is driving investments in new power plants, transmission lines and the grid equipment needed to generate and supply power to data centers.

“For investors, the risk is less an abrupt halt than a slower, costlier and more uneven buildout,” Allianz wrote. But it isn’t all bad for data centers.

In Pennsylvania, where Democrats completed a takeover of all three branches of government by winning the state Senate, Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) has called on developers to sign community benefit agreements and cover the cost of grid upgrades. That might put data center development on a more sustainable path than the Wild West approach that has dominated in recent years, Miller said.

Democrats may also soften their stance now that they are in power, said Ethan Zindler, an analyst at BloombergNEF and former climate counselor at the Treasury Department during the Biden administration.

“I do wonder that, you know, once we get past the initial euphoria from the election from a lot of folks, whether there'll be a quieter reconsideration of this,” he said. “I mean, governors do like to attract investment into their states.”