字号·· | 护眼
福克斯新闻网

约翰·迈兹:民主党获胜只意味着为生命而战具有了更重要的意义JOHN MIZE: Democrat victory just means the fight for life has added importance

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

2025年1月24日,反堕胎权利示威者在华盛顿特区参加第52届年度“生命游行”,向最高法院行进。(Bryan Dozier/中东影像社/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)Anti-abortion rights demonstrators march to the Supreme Court for the 52nd annual March For Life in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 24, 2025. (Bryan Dozier/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

11月3日周二,美国人投下了选票,将国会多数席位交给了反对反堕胎运动的力量。

Tuesday, Nov. 3, Americans cast their votes and turned congressional majorities against the pro-life cause.

人们或许很容易感到绝望,尤其是在经历了两年强有力的反堕胎领导层之后——这期间实现了一个历史性的一年,切断了许多堕胎服务提供商的联邦医疗补助资金来源,但反堕胎运动以前曾在逆境中奋战过,并且取得了胜利。以下是我们如何度过未来两年。

It may be easy to despair, especially following two years of strong, pro-life leadership that accomplished a historic year of defunding many abortion providers from federal Medicaid dollars, but the pro-life movement has fought through hostile waters before — and won. Here’s how we navigate the next two years.

捍卫既有的反堕胎条款必须是首要任务。几个月来我们一直知道,旨在保护纳税人免于被迫直接资助堕胎的“海德修正案”,一直是新一届支持堕胎国会的靶心。

Defending legacy pro-life provisions must be a first priority. We have known for months that the Hyde Amendment, protecting taxpayers from being forced to directly fund abortions, has been in the crosshairs for the next pro-abortion Congress.

但根据“韦尔登修正案”,选择不提供堕胎服务的医疗机构的良心保护条款也可能面临危险。这个支持堕胎的多数派希望让美国人成为其极端主义的同谋。

But conscience protections for healthcare entities that choose not to provide abortions under the Weldon Amendment may also be on the line. This pro-abortion majority wants to make Americans complicit in their extremism.

“海德修正案”和“韦尔登修正案”以前都曾在支持堕胎的多数派手下存活下来,其中包括第117届国会。2021年,众议院拨款委员会推进了一项劳工、卫生与公众服务及教育拨款法案,其中删除了“海德”和“韦尔登”的附加条款语言。

Both the Hyde and Weldon amendments have survived pro-abortion majorities before, including the 117th Congress. In 2021, the House Appropriations Committee advanced a Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education spending bill that omitted both Hyde and Weldon rider language.

尽管两院都由支持堕胎的多数派领导,但反堕胎组织得以集结起来,告诉国会这些保护措施不容谈判。这是我们必须在未来两年继续传达的信息。

Even though both chambers were led by pro-abortion majorities, pro-life organizations were able to rally, telling Congress that these protections are not up for negotiation. This is the same message we must carry over the next two years.

必须提醒国会,保留这些附加条款符合其自身的最大利益,并能获得两党公众的支持。

Congress must also be reminded that preserving these riders is in its own best interest, attaining bipartisan public support.

根据2026年哥伦布骑士会与马里斯特联合进行的民调,54%的美国人反对用纳税人的钱资助堕胎,63%的人支持对医疗服务提供者的良心保护。

According to the 2026 Knights of Columbus/Marist polling, 54% of Americans opposed taxpayer funding of abortion and 63% support conscience protections for healthcare providers.

国会中支持堕胎的议员也可能会敦促通过《妇女健康保护法》。该法案旨在将罗诉韦德案之下的堕胎极端主义状态永久化,阻止任何州或地方在胎儿具备独立生存能力之前限制堕胎。

Pro-abortion members of Congress are also likely to urge the passage of the Women’s Health Protection Act. This bill is intended to codify the state of abortion extremism under Roe v. Wade, preventing any state or locality from restricting abortion before viability.

如果该法案成为法律,它还将抹杀对女性必要的安全保障,例如确认怀孕或排除宫外孕的强制性超声波检查,取消等待期,并允许不受限制的邮购堕胎。

If this became law, it would also erase necessary safeguards for women like mandatory ultrasounds to confirm pregnancy or rule out ectopic pregnancies, eliminate waiting periods and allow unrestricted mail-order abortion.

反堕胎组织更准确地将其称为“妇女健康危害法”,该法案自2013年首次提出以来一直被成功阻击。在第117届国会期间,该法案在众议院获得通过,但未能达到在参议院打破阻挠议事所需的60票门槛。

What pro-life groups have more accurately called the "Women’s Health Endangerment Act" has been fended off since it was first introduced in 2013. Under the 117th Congress, this bill passed the House of Representatives but did not reach the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome cloture in the Senate.

然而,这届新国会正释放出减少政治克制的信号,并可能取消阻挠议事程序,以规避打破阻挠议事所需的必要制衡。反堕胎组织必须团结一致,反对这种极端战术。

However, this new Congress is signaling less political restraint and may eliminate the filibuster to evade the necessary checks-and-balances of cloture. Pro-life groups must be unified in opposing this extreme tactic.

务必记住,国会只是政治机器中的一个齿轮,我们依然可以在特朗普政府内部以及众多州为生命而战。

It is essential to remember that Congress is only one cog in the political machine, and we can still fight for life within the Trump administration and among the many states.

自罗诉韦德案以来,反堕胎运动克服了多轮支持堕胎的控制期,却依然能够在第117届国会结束不久后取得多布斯案的历史性胜利。

The pro-life movement has overcome many cycles of pro-abortion control since Roe and yet still was able to achieve the historic victory in Dobbs not too long after the 117th Congress.

行政机构的行动仍在考虑之中。美国食品药品监督管理局对堕胎药的审查仍在进行中,其向法院提交的最新更新表明,最终结果将于2027年3月前向公众公布。

Administrative agency action is still on the table. The Food and Drug Administration’s review of the abortion pill is still pending, and its latest update to the courts suggest final results will be available to the public by March 2027.

恢复面对面配药要求作为对米非司酮风险评估和缓解策略的最低限度补救措施仍在考虑之中。现在,该机构的审查必须天衣无缝,经得起党派审查的考验,这一点比以往任何时候都更加重要。

Restoring in-person dispensing requirements as a minimum repair to mifepristone’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy is still on the table. It’s even more essential now that the agency’s review is airtight and able to withstand partisan scrutiny.

特朗普政府仍然有权最终撤销拜登政府时期法律顾问办公室带有政治偏见的康斯托克意见,并通过司法部全面执法。

The Trump administration still has the authority to finally rescind the Biden-era Office of Legal Counsel’s politicized Comstock opinion and fully enforcing the law through the Department of Justice.

阻止正在伤害全国女性的邮购堕胎计划,对于应对本周的失利至关重要。

Stopping the mail-order abortion scheme harming women across the country will be essential to combatting the losses of this week.

尽管如此,我们在所有50州的集体努力绝不能动摇。得克萨斯州的失利向我们表明,在那些我们认为最安全的保护生命的地方,我们不能变得自满。

Still, we must not waver from our collective efforts in all 50 states. Losses in Texas showed us that we cannot become complacent in protecting life where we believe it to be the most secure.

美国政治是一场文化之战,正如最高法院大法官安东尼·斯卡利亚所言:“堕胎的容许度及其限制,应该像我们民主制度中的大多数重要问题一样来解决:由公民试图互相说服,然后进行投票。”

American politics is a cultural battle and, as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stated, "[t]he permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting."

阅读媒体原文 ↗