随着我们的科技巨头们继续向人工智能的开发和创新投入更多资源——当然，是负责任地——他们正面临着巨大的信任鸿沟：他们希望使用这项技术的人们不断询问，这项技术到底是为谁而设的。
As our tech overlords continue pumping more resources into AI development and innovation—responsibly, of course—they’re facing a massive trust gap: the people they want to use the tech keep asking who the technology is actually for.
它是为那些呼吁建立监控国家的人服务的吗？它是为了帮助我们与其他国家竞争吗？还是为了取代员工——并决定谁应该失去工作？这些决策的绝大多数是由政府和行业中的富裕男性制定的。
Is it for those who clamor for a surveillance state Is it meant to help us compete with other nations Or is it for replacing employees—and deciding which ones should lose their job? A vast majority of these decisions are made by wealthy men in government and industry.
哈佛大学研究人员周三发布的一项研究显示，该研究包括对超过5000名美国成年人的调查，女性表示她们在这些对话中习惯性地被排除在外——更不用说参与决策了。根据国家妇女和家庭伙伴关系的数据，女性在最容易受到像ChatGPT和Google Gemini这样的AI工具自动化影响的工作岗位中比例过高——超过80%的女性面临此类风险——而且她们更可能表示自己没有获得足够的信息和培训，以了解这些工具在其工作场所是如何被使用的。
According to a study released Wednesday by Harvard University researchers, which included a survey of more than 5,000 US adults, women reported that they are habitually excluded from those conversations—let alone the decision-making—compared to men. Women are disproportionately concentrated in jobs most vulnerable to automation by AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini—more than 80 percent of women face such risks, according to the National Partnership of Women and Families—and were more likely to say they didn’t have sufficient access to information and training about how the tools are used in their workplaces.
因此，该研究发现女性比男性更不信任人工智能工具及其提供的信息，这并不令人意外。（研究人员指出，大多数受访者自认是男性或女性，因此分析“以这两个群体为中心，虽然我们认识到并非所有人都认同性别二元论。”）哈佛肯尼迪学院肖恩斯坦中心执行主任劳拉·曼利告诉我：“独立研究人员在受访者眼中是人工智能领域最值得信赖的来源之一，而谨慎正是他们提供的内容的一部分。”
It’s therefore no surprise that the study found women less likely to trust AI tools, and the information they did get about them, than men. (The researchers note that most respondents identified as men or women, and that the analysis therefore “centers on these two groups, though we recognize that not everyone identifies within a gender binary.”)“Independent researchers rank among our respondents’ most trusted sources on AI, and caution is part of what they offer,” Laura Manley, the executive director of the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center told me.
美国的就业环境几乎没有政府或行业监管，规定雇主如何将人工智能技术融入工作场所，或哪些具体产品被推向公众。但曼利继续说，女性“很少被引用为专家”——根据研究人员在2025年7月至2026年6月期间收集的数据，在国内媒体对人工智能的报道中引用的10万多名专家中，男性出现的频率是女性的4.3倍。
The US employment landscape offers little government or industry regulation on how employers incorporate AI technology into the workplace, or what specific products are promoted to the public. But women are “rarely quoted as experts,” Manley continued—according to data the researchers collected from July 2025 to June 2026, among the well over 100,000 experts cited in domestic news coverage of AI, men appeared 4.3 times more often than women.
该研究发现，人工智能工具被不成比例地视为男性开发、男性使用的工具——女性未被视为在这项技术上具有同等权威或被感知的专业知识，男性和女性受访者都同意“男性的需求和视角在人工智能开发和人工智能生成内容中得到更好的代表。”与此同时，女性更可能报告对人工智能的担忧和怀疑——这种情绪是全球最大人工智能公司的许多领导人物不愿听到的，而且在一个人工智能首席执行官——也是世界上最富有的人——已经喜欢抱怨女权主义的领域里，这种观点尤其不受欢迎。
AI tools, the study found, were disproportionately seen as by and for men—women weren’t seen to have the same level of authority or perceived expertise on the technology, and male and female respondents in the study agreed that “men’s needs and perspectives are better represented in AI development and AI-generated content.”Women, meanwhile, were more likely to report concern and skepticism around AI: a sentiment many leading figures at the world’s largest AI firms do not want to hear, and an especially unwelcome perspective in a sector where a leading AI CEO—and the world’s richest man—already loves to complain about feminism.
女权主义和没有孩子已经夺走了这么多女性的幸福 2026年6月29日 换句话说，人工智能是一个男孩俱乐部——而一些领导人物正是这么希望的。
Feminism and lack of children has killed the happiness of so many women June 29, 2026 AI, in other words, is a boys’ club—and some of its leading figures like it that way.