艾森科特的政党名称“Yashar”（雅沙尔）在希伯来语中意为“诚实”；根据最新民调结果，他极有可能在下次选举中赢得最多的席位。他是否能够成为以色列的下任总理，将取决于该国复杂的政治联盟格局。虽然两位候选人在竞选期间都承诺不会合作，但理论上也有可能形成一个大联盟（即多个政党联合执政）。然而目前他们仍是激烈的竞争对手，在几乎所有问题上都存在分歧……除了纳扎（Naza）之外。
Eisenkot’s party name, Yashar, even means “Honest”, and he is narrowly projected to win the most seats after next week’s poll. Whether he becomes Israel’s next prime minister will depend on the country’s complicated coalition maths. It is even possible that a grand coalition could see the two men work together (despite campaign promises not to). But for now they are bitter rivals and differ on almost everything. Except Naza.
内塔尼亚胡（Netanyahu）将这部影片视为又一个证据，证明以色列的声誉正遭受着前所未有的攻击，而只有他才能保护国家免受这些攻击的伤害。艾森科特本人的儿子加尔·艾森科特（Gal Eisenkot）于2023年12月在加沙地带的隧道中遭遇埋伏身亡；他也强烈谴责了这部影片，称其是对以色列军人的道德侮辱。几乎所有政治派别都持有同样的观点。
Netanyahu is already presenting the film as yet more evidence of how Israel’s reputation is under the kind of relentless attack that only he can be trusted to defend the country against. Eisenkot, whose own son Gal Eisenkot was killed in a booby-trapped tunnel in northern Gaza in December 2023, has also condemned it, calling the film a moral stain on Israel’s soldiers. And the same is true almost across the political board.
这种反应与1982年的情况截然不同。任何仔细观看这部影片并考虑其中所呈现的第一手证据的人，都会得出两个结论：首先，尽管激烈的竞选活动使得激烈的反应在所难免，但以色列政府的愤怒反应既不公正又具有误导性；其次，这部影片具有更广泛的意义——它揭示了战争方式的变革，这种变革不仅发生在以色列和加沙地带，也发生在世界各地。
This reaction, and how it differs from 1982, is telling. For anyone who watches this careful and measured production and considers the first-hand evidence it presents might gain two impressions. First, although the reality of an all-consuming election campaign probably made a splenetic reaction inevitable, the Israeli government’s furious response is unjustified and misguided. And second, Naza achieves wider significance because it paints a picture of how warfare is being transformed not just in Israel and Gaza but everywhere.
在影片中，受访者们描述了科技如何催生了一种极其“冷酷”的手段：人们可以在人们的家中、街道上，或几乎任何地方，通过技术手段识别、追踪并杀害他人。这种技术几乎彻底消除了人们的藏身之处（至少在地面上是如此）。
The killing machine The interviewees describe how technology has enabled a peculiarly clinical method for identifying, tracking and then killing human beings – in their homes, in the streets or just about anywhere else – since this system has come close to abolishing hiding places, at least above ground.
在加沙，这一过程依赖于对该地区约两百万人口近乎全员的持续大规模监控。以色列监听他们的通话，追踪他们的行踪，并为每一栋房屋、每一套公寓或任何类型的住所分配一个序列号，将加沙变成了某种近乎巨型全景监狱的存在。几乎每一平方英寸都能被置于监视之下，地道网络内部除外。
In Gaza, the process depends on the constant mass surveillance of just about all of the territory’s two million people. Israel monitors their conversations, follows their movements and assigns a serial number to every house, flat or dwelling of any kind, transforming Gaza into something approximating to a giant panopticon. Just about every square inch can be made visible, except within the network of tunnels.
这依赖于普及的智能手机，这些手机被劫持并变成了追踪和窃听设备，以及人工智能，后者能够分析并理解上述所有手段产生的海量数据。
That relies on universally owned smartphones, which are hijacked and turned into tracking and eavesdropping devices, and AI, which can analyse and make sense of the colossal haul of data produced by all of the above.
纪录片中的一名军官描述了以色列如何使用一款名为“薰衣草”（Lavender）的AI工具来识别加沙的哈马斯恐怖分子——这实际上等同于给这些人判处死刑——依据的指标包括他们与谁通话、住在哪里以及他们的行动轨迹。
One officer in the documentary describes how Israel uses an AI tool called Lavender to identify the Hamas terrorists in Gaza – effectively the same as marking those individuals for death – based on indicators like whom they talk to, where they live and what their movements are.
我们得知，“薰衣草”已从加沙居民中筛选出了6万至7万人，声称的准确率为85%。
We learn that Lavender has singled out between 60,000 and 70,000 of Gaza’s inhabitants with a supposed accuracy rate of 85 per cent.
这种定点清除引出了一个至关重要的问题，这也是影片标题的由来。为了消灭一名哈马斯恐怖分子，你准备牺牲多少无辜旁观者——男人、女人和儿童？“纳扎”（Naza）是以色列军方的行话，指可接受的平民死亡人数，源自希伯来语短语“Nezek agavi”，意为“附带损害”。
Such targeting raises the vital question that gives the film its title. How many innocent bystanders – men, women and children – are you prepared to kill in order to eliminate a single Hamas terrorist? “Naza” is the Israeli military jargon for an acceptable number of civilian deaths, based on the Hebrew phrase Nezek agavi, or “collateral damage”.
一名受访者称，在加沙战争期间，击杀一名哈马斯行动人员（无论职位多低）的“纳扎”指标为20人。针对更高级别人物，该数字上升至数百人。据称，针对一次获批的打击行动，该数字高达500人。
One interviewee claims that during the Gaza war the naza for killing one Hamas operative, however junior, was 20. For more senior figures, the naza figure rose to the hundreds. For one approved strike, it was supposedly 500.