
最新消息显示,根据一项新的民调结果:美国人不相信民调。根据由PF Global进行的一项《政治报》民调显示,只有25%的美国人认为政治调查能正确预测投票结果。这一结果表明,在民调行业面临未能持续覆盖共和党选民的指责之际,相当一部分公众对其缺乏信心。
This just in, according to new poll results: Americans don’t trust polls. Only 25% of Americans said political surveys correctly estimate votes, according to a new POLITICO Poll, conducted by PF Global. The result reveals that a significant portion of the public lacks faith in the industry as it contends with accusations of consistently failing to reach Republican voters.
在此背景下,2026年中期选举正受到高度审视,公众民调和各竞选阵营内部民调显示,在关键战场以及曾经稳固的红色地盘上,许多选战的差距都在误差范围之内。
It comes amid an intensely scrutinized 2026 midterm cycle, where public polling and campaigns’ internal polls have shown many races within the margin of error in key battlegrounds and in once-safe red territory.
大约四分之一的受访者表示,显示11月将出现“蓝色浪潮”的民调是错误的,他们预计共和党将在关键选战中获胜。41%的美国人——包括两党选民——要么认为民调往往低估了民主党人,要么认为民调往往低估了共和党人。
Roughly one in four respondents say that polls showing a blue wave coming in November are wrong, and they expect Republicans to win key races. And 41% of Americans — including voters of both parties — either say polls tend to underestimate Democrats or that they tend to underestimate Republicans.
此前曾出现过一些备受瞩目的失误:在整个特朗普时代,民调都曾出现偏差。仅在本轮选举周期中,民主党初选的调查就错误预测了进步派弗兰西斯卡·洪将赢得威斯康星州长竞选,并且错误预测了阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德(他最终确已成为民主党密歇根州参议员候选人)会以远大于他最终险胜的1个百分点的优势获胜。
There have been some high-profile blunders: Polls have missed themark throughout the Trump era. This cycle alone, surveys in Democratic primaries incorrectly predicted that progressive Francesca Hong would win the race for Wisconsin governor and that Abdul El-Sayed — who did become Democrat’s Michigan Senate nominee — would win by a much wider margin than the 1 percentage point victory he eked out.
众议院议长迈克·约翰逊和其他共和党人对最新的民调预测表示怀疑:“民调‘严重低估了全国共和党人的热情’,”约翰逊本周在福克斯新闻上表示,并补充说,“越来越多的共和党人不愿意参与这些调查。”
Speaker Mike Johnson and other Republicans have cast doubt on the latest forecasts: The polls are “grossly underestimating Republican enthusiasm around the country,” Johnson said on Fox News this week, adding that “more and more Republicans are unwilling to participate in these surveys.”
唐纳德·特朗普总统称民调是“虚假的”和“被操纵的”。副总统JD·万斯表示,他告诉人们要无视民调,因为民调对共和党选民有“打击士气的效果”。
President Donald Trump has called the polls “fake” and “rigged.”Vice President JD Vance said he tells people to ignore the polls because they have a “demotivating effect on our voters.”
民调专家知道他们的行业正面临严厉审视。不过:“没有其他东西能取代这一工具的全部功能,”民主党智库“探照灯研究所”分析总监夏洛特·斯韦西告诉《政客》杂志。“这是我们现有的工具,而且很难用,难度越来越大。但绝不能说它已经死了。”多年来,民调专家做出了一系列改进——比如获取各个受教育程度层面的受访者,或调整方法论以应对任何特定群体的低回应率。
Pollsters know their industry is facing heavy scrutiny. However: “There isn't another thing waiting in the wings to replace the full purpose of this tool,” said Charlotte Swasey, the director of analytics for the Democratic think tank Searchlight Institute, told POLITICO. “This is what we have, and it's difficult, it's increasingly difficult. But it's not dead by any sense of the word.”Pollsters have made a number of changes over the years — like capturing respondents across all levels of education attainment or adjusting their methodologies to account for low response rates among any given group.
尽管如此,大约五分之二在2024年投票给特朗普的美国人认为,政治民调倾向于低估共和党。
Still, roughly two in five Americans who voted for Trump in 2024 say political polls tend to underestimate Republicans.
他们的感受并非完全没有根据。2016年,民调专家严重低估了对时任候选人特朗普的支持,大多数民调都集中在前国务卿希拉里·克林顿相对稳操胜券这一预测上。
Their feelings are not completely unfounded. In 2016, pollsters grossly underestimated support for then-candidate Trump, with most polls coalescing around a relatively secure victory for former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton.
这种不信任在自认为是“MAGA共和党人”的特朗普选民中尤为普遍——这是他最忠诚的基本盘。五分之三的MAGA特朗普选民认为,显示民主党将在下周关键竞选中获胜的民调是不正确的。而在非MAGA特朗普选民中,只有三分之一持相同看法。
Distrust is especially widespread among Trump voters who identify as “MAGA Republicans” — his most loyal base. Three in five MAGA Trump voters say the polls indicating Democrats will win key races next week are incorrect. Among non-MAGA Trump voters, just a third feel the same.
“全国民调总是低估对共和党人的支持,”共和党全国委员会全国新闻秘书娜塔莉·巴尔达萨雷(Natalie Baldassarre)表示。“民调可能会暗示某种情况,但美国人民拥有最终决定权,共和党人依然全神贯注于动员选民投票、打破历史规律以及保护我们的多数席位。”公共民意调查公司“领头羊研究”(Bellwether Research)总裁克里斯蒂娜·马修斯(Christine Matthews)在最近的一次采访中告诉《政客》杂志:“我确实认为,在其中一些红州,共和党基本盘选民的不回应是一个问题。”
“National polls always underestimate support for Republicans,” said RNC national press secretary Natalie Baldassarre. “Polls may suggest one thing, but the American people get the final say, and Republicans remain laser-focused on driving voters to the polls, defying history, and protecting our majorities." “I do think that non-response among base Republican voters in some of these red states is a problem,” Christine Matthews, president of public opinion polling firm Bellwether Research, told POLITICO in a recent interview.
在距离选举日不到一周之际,随着堪萨斯州、密西西比州和内布拉斯加州等州的参议院竞选——以及在某种程度上南卡罗来纳州和路易斯安那州的竞选——全部陷入白热化,共和党候选人和官员们正把希望寄托在不回应这一前提上。如果民调被证明是准确的,他们可能会在深红阵营遭遇曾被认为不可想象的失利。但这种不信任并不局限于共和党人。
Republican candidates and officials are banking on the non-response caveat as Senate races in states like Kansas, Mississippi and Nebraska — and to some extent, in South Carolina and Louisiana — all tighten, with less than one week until Election Day. If polling proves true, they could experience once-unthinkable losses in deep-red territory. But distrust is not limited to Republicans.
在两党中,许多人在一个名为“韦奇伍德民调”(Wedgewood Polls)的机构在“五加一”(FiftyPlusOne)的审查下承认在几次民主党初选的民调结果中使用虚假数据后感到愤怒,一些人认为这影响了选举结果。另一个机构则在洛杉矶市长竞选上发布了虚假民调数据,以此作为测试,看看这些数据在未经核实前如何传播。
Many in both parties were outraged after one group — Wedgewood Polls — admitted under scrutiny from FiftyPlusOne to using fake data in its polling results in several Democratic primaries, which some believe impacted election results. Another group published fake polling data on the Los Angeles mayoral race as a test to see how the data would travel before being verified.
支持前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯的选民中,有近三分之一的人表示,政治民调往往会低估民主党人。
And just under a third of voters who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris say political polls tend to underestimate Democrats.
部分不信任可以归结为一个事实,即民调并非旨在预测结果。它们只是特定时间点上公众情绪的一个快照——而且人们可能会改变主意。五分之一的美国人在《政客》杂志的调查中表示,他们在关于自己将如何投票的民调中填写的答案,与他们实际的投票方式不同。
Part of the distrust can come down to the fact that polls are not intended to forecast outcomes. They are a snapshot of public sentiment at a given point in time — and people can change their minds. One in five Americans said in POLITICO’s survey they have filled in a poll on how they would vote differently than how they actually voted.
“当然有人会在民调中说一套,几周后做的却是另一套,”总部位于伦敦的PF Global民调负责人、POLITICO民调合作伙伴塞布·赖德(Seb Wride)表示。“我认为,今年早些时候那些出现重大偏差的竞选,很有可能是在最后一周才定下胜负的。”根据POLITICO最近的一项调查,民调——如果操作得当,需要周密的计划和严谨的方法论——获得的信任度并不比预测市场高多少,后者的赔率仅由公众下注决定。
“Of course there are people who say something to a poll and then do something different a couple of weeks later,” said Seb Wride, head of polling at London-based PF Global, POLITICO’s polling partner. “I think it's quite possible that some of the races that were real big misses earlier this year were decided in the very last week.”According to a recent POLITICO survey, polls — which, when conducted correctly, involve careful planning and meticulous methodology — don’t earn much more trust than prediction markets, where odds are determined simply by bets placed by the public.
仅有18%的人表示,他们更信任基于民调的预测,而非预测市场,能正确预判选举结果。这仅比认为预测市场比民调更可信的12%的人略高。三分之一的人表示两者都不信任。
Just 18% of people said they trusted poll-based forecasts over prediction markets to correctly predict the outcome of an election. That’s a marginal lead on the 12% of people who said they trust prediction markets over polls. A third said they trust neither.
尽管如此,大多数选民表示他们确实会根据民调做决定。大约55%的美国人说,如果民调显示他们支持的候选人大幅落后,他们“肯定”会去投票。即使在那些认为民调低估自家政党的共和党中期选举选民中,也有约75%的人持同样看法。
Still, most voters say they do make decisions based on polling. Roughly 55% of Americans say they would “definitely” go vote if the polls showed their preferred candidate far behind. Even among Republican midterm voters who say the polls underestimate their party, roughly 75% say the same.
“许多选民都有动力向体制传递一个信息,”资深共和党策略师凯文·马登(Kevin Madden)说。“我认为,特别是在[政治]右翼,他们会有动力传递信息,而这个信息实质上是‘你们错了,选民才是对的’。”竞选团队面临的大问题是“这样的人够不够多?”他说。
“There are a lot of voters that are motivated to send a message to the system,” said longtime GOP strategist Kevin Madden. “I think particularly on the [political] right, they'll be motivated to send a message, and essentially that message is ‘You're wrong, and the voters are right.’”The big question for campaigns is “are there enough of those?” he said.