
随着美国中期选举结果在周二深夜出炉,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普接听了新闻媒体《政治报》(Politico)的电话。
As the United States midterm election results landed late on Tuesday night, United States President Donald Trump took a phone call from the news outlet Politico.
民主党的浪潮淹没了特朗普的共和党。在他两次担任总统的任期中,这是共和党首次不再控制国会两院中的任何一院。
wave for the Democratic Party had sunk Trump’s Republican Party. For the first time in his two stints as president, Trump’s Republican Party no longer controlled either chamber of Congress.
但在电话采访中,特朗普表现得毫不在意——并抛出了橄榄枝:他说他愿意与民主党人合作。“他们已经打来电话了,他们想和我合作。我有权否决一切,但我不想只是坐在那里两年,光否决所有东西,”他说。
But in the phone interview, Trump put on a brave face — and offered an olive branch: He said that he would be willing to work with Democrats“They’ve already called, and they want to work with me. I have the right to veto everything, but I don’t want to be just sitting there for two years just vetoing everything,” he said.
虽然仍有少数席位尚在计票中,但民主党已在众议院和参议院均赢得舒适多数:在众议院,他们已获得435个席位中的至少253个;在参议院,他们已赢得100个席位中的至少54个。
While a handful of seats remain to be counted, the Democrats have won comfortable majorities in both the House of Representatives, where they have secured at least 253 seats out of 435, and in the Senate, where they have won at least 54 out of 100.
此后,特朗普在其Truth Social账号上发布了一张照片,用那顶“让美国再次伟大”红色棒球帽拼出“VETO”(否决)字样。尽管民主党取得成功,但作为总统,特朗普拥有广泛的行政权力,美国宪法第一条第七款规定,总统有权否决国会通过的立法。
Trump has since posted a picture on his Truth Social account using the Make America Great Again red baseball hat to read “VETO”. Despite the Democrats’ success, as president, Trump holds broad executive authority, with Article 1, Section 7 of the US Constitution stipulating that the president has the power to reject legislation passed by Congress through a veto.
国会可以推翻否决,但需要三分之二多数,而民主党在两院均不具备这一优势。
Congress can override the veto, but would need to have a two-thirds majority, something that the Democrats do not have in either chamber.
但特朗普对《政治报》的言论凸显了另一种可能性——总统可能会挑选何时否决、何时与民主党合作。
But Trump’s comments to Politico underscore an alternate possibility — the president may pick and choose when to veto, and when to work with Democrats.
两党谈判 就目前形势而言,特朗普有三个选择:否决立法、实施行政命令或达成交易。
Bipartisan negotiations As it stands, Trump has three options: veto legislation, enforce executive orders or make deals.
自特朗普于2025年1月就职以来,他已签署292项行政命令:据联邦……注册,今年67项,去年225项。
Since Trump was inaugurated in January 2025, he has passed 292 executive orders: 67 this year and 225 last year, according to the Federal.
但现在,据伦敦大学学院美国政治学讲师安德鲁·普罗克特(Andrew Proctor)称,特朗普在国会面前的筹码甚至比以前更少了。
But now, according to Andrew Proctor, a lecturer in US politics at University College London, Trump has even less leverage than before with Congress.
“我认为最大的看点是我们可能会看到相当程度的僵局。民主党将试图推行政策,但他拥有否决权,而民主党在两院都没有足够席位来推翻他的任何否决,”普罗克特说。
“I think the biggest thing is we’re probably going to see a decent amount of gridlock. The Democrats are going to try to pass policies, but he’s got the power to veto them, and Democrats don’t have enough seats in either chamber to overcome any vetoes that he has,” Proctor said.
“因此这就引出一个问题:他是否会尝试与民主党在立法通过上进行任何合作?我认为近期的历史表明这不太可能。”尽管如此,仍有人表示愿意与总统合作,推进其竞选承诺的核心项目。
“So that raises questions about, will he try to work with the Democrats at all on passing legislation? I think recent history says that’s unlikely.”Still, some have said that they would work with the president to advance programmes central to their campaign promises.
密西根州的阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德是首位当选美国参议员的穆斯林,他已表示可以与特朗普合作——尽管这位美国总统在竞选期间曾使用种族主义和伊斯兰恐惧症言论攻击埃尔-赛义德。
Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed, the first Muslim elected to the US Senate, has already said he could work with Trump — even though the US president had used racist and Islamophobic rhetoric to target El-Sayed during the campaign.
埃尔-赛义德周四对MSNOW表示,如果特朗普有意“让金钱退出政治、把钱装进民众腰包并通过‘全民医保’法案,这正是我参选要做的事,我期待与任何愿意做这件事的人合作”。
El-Sayed told MSNOW on Thursday that if Trump was interested in “getting money out of politics, putting money in pockets and passing Medicare for All, that’s what I ran to do, and I’m looking forward to working with anyone who is willing to do that”.
“他是美利坚合众国总统,”他说。“我将是一名美国参议员,如果他有意在我想推进的议题上合作——让更多人获得医保、停止削减医保、结束愚蠢的战争、停止这些与加拿大的愚蠢关税——那么就让我们谈谈如何做成这些事,去为公众交付成果。”进步派参议员伯尼·桑德斯在近期采访中也表示,如果民主党在国会两院通过“全民医保”法案,他不会排除特朗普签署该法案的可能。他形容特朗普是一位“政治家”,并不“过于意识形态化”。
“He is the president of the United States,” he said. “I’m going to be one United States senator, and if he’s interested in working on issues that I want to work on – getting more people healthcare, ending the Medicare cuts, ending the stupid war, stopping these stupid tariffs with Canada – then let’s talk about doing that and go and deliver for the public.”Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders has also said, in recent interviews, that he would not rule out Trumpg onto a Medicare for All bill if Democrats pass it in both chambers of Congress. He described Trump as a “politician” who was not “too ideological”.
普罗克特认为,特朗普确实可能基于这能让他形象多好的考量与民主党达成交易,但在未来两年内让“全民医保”法案通过似乎不太可能。
Proctor argued that Trump could indeed make a deal with the Democrats based on how good it could make him look, but that getting Medicare for All passed in the next two years appeared unlikely.
“我确实认为,在医疗保健领域可能出现共同立场的地方,是撤销特朗普早期立法中削减的那些补贴,”他说。“这将使数百万美国人的医疗保健更加负担得起。”普罗克特指出,2025年一些共和党人曾表示愿意与民主党人就医疗改革进行谈判。
“I do think that a place where common ground could emerge on healthcare is rolling back, specifically the sort of subsidies that were cut” under Trump’s earlier legislation he said. “So that would make healthcare more affordable for millions of Americans.”Proctor pointed out that some Republicans in 2025 had said they were willing to negotiate with Democrats on healthcare reforms.
“那最终没有发生,但我可以想象,这可能是我们在医疗保健具体政策方面看到某种进展的一个领域,”他说。“不过,我认为关于通过‘全民医保’的更广泛医疗保健辩论,实际上并不在考虑范围内。” 否决权或阻挠议事 虽然特朗普表示他愿意使用否决权,但他历史上并非这一做法最热衷的支持者之一。
“That didn’t end up happening, but I could imagine that might be a place for healthcare-specific policy where we could see something emerge,” he said. “I don’t think that a broader healthcare debate on passing Medicare for All, though, is really in the cards.”Veto or filibuster Though Trump has said he would be willing to use veto, he has historically not been among the most avid proponents of the practice.
他在本届任期内迄今已使用否决权两次,首届任期内使用了10次。乔·拜登在其单一任期内使用了12次,而贝拉克·奥巴马在两届任期内共使用了12次。
He has so far used the veto twice in this term, and used it 10 times during his first term. Joe Biden used it 12 times in his single term, while Barack Obama used the veto a dozen times over two terms.
总体而言,总统使用否决权的情况随时间推移而减少:比尔·克林顿在1993年至2001年间否决了37项立法。他的前任乔治·H·W·布什在其单一任期内使用了44次——几乎每月一次。罗纳德·里根在其两届任期内共使用了78次。
Overall, the presidential use of the veto has declined with time: Bill Clinton vetoed legislation 37 times between 1993 and 2001. His predecessor, George HW Bush, used it 44 times in his single term — almost once a month. Ronald Reagan used it 78 times over his two terms.
但普罗克特表示,共和党还有一种不同的工具来试图阻挠立法。那就是阻挠议事,一种通过延长辩论来推迟对特定立法进行表决的策略,这将影响民主党推动法案通过的能力。
But Proctor said that Republicans also have a different tool to try and block legislation. That is the filibuster, a tactic that delays a vote on a specific piece of legislation by using an extended debate, which would impact the Democrats’ ability to get something passed.
“这就是他们对[前总统贝拉克·]奥巴马所做的事,”普罗克特告诉半岛电视台。“参议院共和党人很可能会尝试做同样的事,这也意味着我们甚至不会达到特朗普拥有否决权的地步,因为立法根本无法首先送达他手中。” 弹劾 自民主党在周二的中期选举中大获全胜以来,针对政府的调查呼声已经出现。
“This is what they did to [former President Barack] Obama,” Proctor told Al Jazeera. “Senate Republicans will probably try to do the same thing, and it also means that we don’t even get to the point of Trump having the power to veto because the legislation never reaches him in the first place.”Impeachment Since the Democrats swept the midterms on Tuesday, calls for investigations against the administration have already emerged.
在他的第一个任期内,特朗普曾两次遭到弹劾——第一次是因为滥用职权和阻碍国会工作,第二次是因为“煽动”美国国会大厦骚乱。
In his first term, Trump was impeached twice — first for the abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, and the second time for “inciting” the US Capitol riots.
周二晚间,即将出任众议院监督委员会主席的美国众议员罗伯特·加西亚在X平台上写道:“请律师吧。”预计将领导参议院财政委员会的参议员罗恩·怀登在X平台发帖称:“传票。”然而,特朗普政府已经否认有任何不当行为。
On Tuesday night, US Representative Robert Garcia, who is set to become chairman of the House Oversight Committee, wrote on X: “LAWYER UP.”Senator Ron Wyden, who is expected to lead the Senate Finance Committee, wrote in a post on X: “Subpoenas.”However, the Trump administration has already denied any wrongdoing.
白宫发言人劳伦·比斯周三表示:“如果民主党人选择追究虚假调查并推行激进左翼政策,他们就是选择与美国人民为敌。”
“If Democrats choose to pursue sham investigations and radical left policies, they are choosing to work against the American people,” said White House spokesperson Lauren Bis on Wednesday.
报道还表明,针对国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯的弹劾程序可能迫在眉睫,缘由是伊朗战争——特朗普和其他共和党人将该党的失利归咎于这场战争。
Reports also suggest that impeachment proceedings against Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth might be imminent, over the Iran war that Trump and other Republicans have blamed for the party’s losses.