
今年秋季选票上的每一位现任者,无论共和党还是民主党,都在拿一组数字竞选。失业率 4.2%。家庭收入创纪录。通胀“降温”。我在六个月的餐桌旁学到的五件事,解释了为什么这些数字无法打动人心。
Every incumbent on the ballot this fall, Republican or Democrat, is running on a set of numbers. Unemployment at 4.2%. Record household income. Inflation “cooling.”The five things I learned over six months of kitchen tables explain why those numbers aren’t landing.
我花了大半年时间试图回答一个问题:为什么美国人对经济的感受如此糟糕,而纸面上的经济却如此美好?约 74% 的美国人将经济评价为糟糕,这与 2009 年的 84% 相差无几,当时国家每月流失数十万个就业岗位。
I spent the better part of a year trying to answer one question: Why do Americans feel this bad about an economy that, on paper, is this good? Some 74% of Americans rate the economy as poor, not far off the 84% who said the same in 2009, when the country was shedding jobs by the hundreds of thousands.
那些把银行对账单递给我这个陌生人的人,因为没人问过他们,不会被一份竞选传单打动。对那些房租翻倍且维持在高位的人来说,“降温”的通胀听起来像是一种侮辱。当一个家庭距离崩溃只差一张普通账单时,它的备选方案是睡在车里。多年来责怪自己的人,开始责怪掌权者。父母和祖父母在担心,他们的孩子是否还能留在自己建立生活的地方。
People who handed me, a stranger, their bank statements because nobody else was asking aren’t going to be won over by a mailer. “Cooling” inflation sounds like an insult to people whose rent doubled and stayed doubled. When a family is one ordinary bill from the edge, its backup plan is sleeping in the car. People who spent years blaming themselves have started blaming the people in charge. Parents and grandparents are wondering if their children will get to stay in the places they built.
这是一个愤怒且不相信手中选票能改变什么的选民群体。在最胶着的竞选中,哪位候选人拥有更好的计划可能不重要。重要的是,人们最终相信谁在倾听。
This is an electorate that is angry and unconvinced its vote changes anything. In the closest races in the country, it may not matter which candidate has the better plan. It may matter which one people finally believe was listening.
我先建了电子表格。我是个靠数字吃饭的人,对此不做道歉。但电子表格解释不了问题。六期节目中、四十多位受访者在自己的餐桌旁、通常摊着账单,做到了这一点。以下是他们教会我的五件事,是任何宏观数字都无法说明的。
I built the spreadsheets first. I’m a numbers guy, and I won’t apologize for it. But the spreadsheets didn’t explain it. More than four dozen people across six episodes did, though, at their own kitchen tables, usually with their bills spread out in front of us. Here are the five things they taught me that no top-line number will.
当华盛顿说通胀在降温,意思是物价涨幅放缓。并不意味着什么东西变便宜了。这种区别听起来像是经济学家的吹毛求疵。但在餐桌旁,它关乎一切。
When Washington says inflation is cooling, it means prices are rising more slowly. It doesn’t mean anything got cheaper. That distinction sounds like economist hair-splitting. At the kitchen table, it’s everything.
乔琳·西梅切克在克利夫兰的房租在七年间“从 785 美元涨到了近 1600 美元”,房子还是同一套。“报税的时候,”她告诉我,“我的收入绝对没有翻倍。”在坦帕,菲比·怀特的房租从 850 美元涨到了 1250 美元,而她的社会保障金却纹丝不动。“你的账单会涨,”她说,“但你的社会保障金不会涨。”被称为生活成本调整(COLA)的年度调整近年来未能跟上开支的上涨。
Jolene Simecek’s rent in Cleveland went “from $785 to nearly $1,600” for the same apartment in the space of seven years. “When I file my taxes,” she told me, “my income is definitely not doubled.”In Tampa, Phebie White’s rent climbed from $850 to $1,250 while her Social Security check sat still. “Your bills are going to go up,” she said, “but your Social Security is not going to go up.”Annual adjustments, known as COLAs, have not kept pace with rising expenses in recent years.
自 2024 年 12 月以来,物价上涨了 6.8%。平均时薪上涨了 5.9%。这两个数字的差距就是整个故事的缩影,也是为什么“经济正在好转”听起来像是一种侮辱。
Prices are up 6.8% since December 2024. Average hourly pay is up 5.9%. That gap is the whole story in two numbers, and it’s why “the economy is improving” lands like an insult.
亚特兰大的一位二十多岁的年轻人凯·琼斯用四个词概括了她朋友们的财务状况:“我们正处于衰退中。”按所有官方衡量标准,我们并没有。她描述的不是定义,而是一种感受,而这种感受正是民调中所反映的内容。
A 20-something in Atlanta, Kay Jones, summed up her friends’ finances for me in four words: “We’re in a recession.”By every official measure, we’re not. She wasn’t describing a definition. She was describing a feeling, and that feeling is what shows up in the polls.
没有单一的灾难击垮我遇到的这些人。是日复一日的磨损:住房、保险、食品、育儿、电费,样样都在涨,样样都无法省去。这让他们离危机只差一个意外:一条 70 美元的轮胎,一张 400 美元的兽医账单,周一到期的 1100 美元水电费,暴风雪中没电的汽车电瓶。
No single catastrophe wiped out the people I met. It was the grind: housing, insurance, food, childcare, electricity, all of it climbing, none of it optional. That left them one surprise away from crisis: a $70 tire, a $400 vet bill, an $1,100 utility bill due Monday, a dead battery in a snowstorm.
让我没想到的是,他们中有那么多人已经悄悄算计好了后路。而答案往往是那辆车。
What I wasn’t prepared for was how many of them had already, quietly, worked out what came next. And how often the answer was the car.
菲比把车险保费放在几乎所有开支之前缴纳。“万一我得睡在车里,”她对我说,“我祈祷那种事永远别发生。”我请她解释一下。她说她认识不少已经这么做的人,“除非他们自己告诉你,否则你根本不会知道他们睡在车里。”
Phebie keeps her car insurance paid before almost anything else. “Just in case I need to sleep in it,” she told me, “and I pray that that never happens.”I asked her to explain. She said she knows plenty of people who already do, and “you won’t know that they’re sleeping in their car until they tell you.”
在坦帕的一家免费诊所,我坐在一位名叫埃伦·特罗西诺的64岁癌症幸存者旁边,当我问她住在车里多久了,她回答说:“呃,大概一周吧。”在北卡罗来纳州罗基蒙特,靠固定收入生活的退伍军人希拉·斯卡伯勒,在市政府切断她家电力后,今年夏天大多数夜晚都在车里度过了七周。在外滩群岛,导游斯图·莱尔德住在自己的卡车里,直到一月的一场风暴把电池冻坏了,他最终冻伤、住了三次院、还摔断了髋骨。
At a free clinic in Tampa, I sat down next to a 64-year-old cancer survivor named Elen Trosino, and when I asked how long she’d been living in her car, she said, “Uh, like a week now.”In Rocky Mount, North Carolina, Sheila Scarborough, a veteran on a fixed income, slept in hers most nights for seven weeks this summer after the city cut her power. On the Outer Banks, a tour guide named Stu Laird lived in his truck until the battery died in a January storm and he ended up with frostbite, three hospital stays and a broken hip.
他们年龄、种族、地区和政治立场各不相同。每一个人都独自想到了同一个应急方案。我报道这类题材已近二十年,在任何政府数据系列里都找不到这张安全网。对数百万美国人来说,那是一辆带后排座椅、正在贬值的资产。这件事至今仍让我挥之不去。
They differ in age, race, region and politics. Every one of them landed on the same contingency plan, alone. I’ve covered this stuff for nearly two decades, and I can’t find that safety net in any government data series. For millions of Americans, it’s a depreciating asset with a back seat. This one still gets under my skin.
在每一个城市,面对酝酿了数十年的种种力量——掠夺性借贷、靠贫困工资运转的托儿市场、拒绝扩大医疗补助的州政府、把柴油价格推高至6美元以上的战争——人们看着满目疮痍,却以为问题出在自己身上。
In every city, people facing forces that took decades to build – predatory lending, a childcare market that runs on poverty wages, a state that refused to expand Medicaid, a war that sent diesel past $6 – looked at the damage and assumed were the problem.
“我没做出正确的决定,”乔琳告诉我。菲比说,如果她们那一代人当时懂得更多,本会做得更好。爱荷华州种植玉米和大豆的农场主科里·古德休盯着超支的柴油预算,对我说:“要么是我做错了,要么是通胀害了我。责任得止步于这张桌子。”一位坦帕女子花了35年帮别人申请食品券和医疗补助,如今自己却没了医保,她说:“我能给任何人出主意,唯独给不了自己。”
“I didn’t make the right decisions,” Jolene told me. Phebie said if her generation had known better, they would have done better. Corey Goodhue, an Iowa corn and soybean farmer staring at his over-budget diesel line, told me, “Either I did it wrong or inflation got me. The buck has to stop at this desk.”A Tampa woman who spent 35 years getting other people onto food stamps and Medicaid, now uninsured herself, said, “I can counsel anybody, I can’t counsel myself.”
我起初会笑,因为听起来荒谬,我以为他们各自都在说一句自知的俏皮话。随后我意识到他们有多么认真,说实话,我会生气。当一个体系安静得足以让人察觉不到破裂时,被它击垮的人会怪罪自己。
I’d smile at first, because it sounded absurd and I assumed each was delivering a knowing quip. Then I’d realize how much they meant it, and, to be candid, I’d get pissed. When a system breaks quietly enough, the people it breaks blame themselves.
但自我指责不会永远停留在自我指责上。乔琳在我们谈话接近尾声时说得最透彻:“我有点纳闷,为什么不多愤怒的人?”他们现在愤怒了。超过四分之三的美国人表示对国家走向不满或愤怒,37%的人直言自己彻底愤怒了。我听到的焦虑不只关乎本月的账单。它关乎谁有资格留下来。
But self-blame doesn’t stay self-blame forever. Jolene said it best near the end of our conversation: “I’m kind of questioning why more people aren’t mad.”They are now. More than three-quarters of Americans say they’re dissatisfied or angry about the direction of the country, and 37% call themselves flat-out angry. The anxiety I heard wasn’t only about this month’s bills. It was about who gets to stay.
格雷格和奥德丽·邓恩在波士顿郊区为三个孩子支付了一年11.4万美元的托儿费。“即使我们想要第四个孩子,”格雷格说,“我们也永远负担不起第四个。”
Greg and Audrey Dunn paid $114,000 in daycare in a single year for three kids in suburban Boston. “Even if we wanted a fourth kid,” Greg said, “we could never afford a fourth.”
在外滩群岛,企业主克里斯·马里克买房子只是为了留住员工,他推断三个女儿大概率再也无法住在她们长大的地方。“如果我遵守规则、纳税、这么做,本该行得通,”他说。“但在纸面上,永远行不通。”在亚特兰大,迈拉·马丁内斯眼睁睁看着移民父母被挤出他们帮忙建设的社区。她说父母“失去了两个家园”:他们离开的祖国,和他们在这里建立的社区。在爱荷华州,一位年轻农民解释说,按现行税规,让年长亲属持地去世比卖给他更划算。
On the Outer Banks, business owner Chris Marik buys houses just to keep his staff and figures his three daughters will probably never be able to live where they grew up. “If I play by the rules, pay my taxes and do this, it should work out,” he said. “On paper, it’s never gonna work out.”In Atlanta, Mayra Martinez watched her immigrant parents get priced out of the neighborhood they helped build. They “lost two homes,” she said: the country they left, and the community they made here. In Iowa, a young farmer explained that under current tax rules, it makes more sense for an older relative to die holding the land than to sell it to him.
乔琳从未有过可继承的代际财富,她决心让儿子拥有。“如果我在42岁时还在困难中挣扎,”她问我,“我怎么能指望我快18岁的儿子买得起房?”这就是为什么35岁以下的选民是全国最悲观的群体之一:84%的人对经济状况评价不佳。这不是一种情绪,而是关于他们自身未来的算账。
And Jolene, who never had generational wealth to inherit, is determined that her son will. “If I’m having trouble and struggling at 42,” she asked me, “how do I expect my gonna-be-18-year-old to get a place?”That’s why voters under 35 are among the most pessimistic in the country: 84% rate the economy poorly. It isn’t a mood. It’s math about their own futures.
当我坐在厨房餐桌旁和私人办公室里,逐行核对育儿发票、水电费账单和预算表格时,我常常不禁惊叹于如此多人愿意如此坦诚地敞开自己个人财务压力点和困境。我后来相信,其中一部分原因是,没有其他人问过。
As I sat at kitchen tables and personal offices walking line-by-line through childcare invoices, utility bills and budget spreadsheets, I often caught myself marveling at the willingness of so many to be so transparent about their personal financial pressure points and struggles. Part of it, I came to believe, was that nobody else had asked.
希拉直言不讳。“他们不在听,”她告诉我。“我们作为公民,正在努力告诉你们发生了什么,但没有人在听。”我问菲比,政策制定者是否理解她正在经历的事情,她说了一个词,“不。”接着:“因为他们没有经历过挣扎。”当希拉家停电时,竞选电话打进来,她对他们有一句话:“在帮我把灯点亮之前,别问我要不要投票给任何人。”
Sheila said it outright. “They’re not listening,” she told me. “We are trying, as citizens, trying to tell you what’s going on, but nobody’s listening.”When I asked Phebie whether policymakers understand what she’s going through, she said one word, “No.”Then: “Because they don’t have the struggle.”And when the campaign calls came while Sheila’s power was off, she had a message for them: “Until you help get my lights on, don’t ask me about voting for nobody.”
这就是这场选举如此难以预测的原因。经济和生活成本领先于所有其他问题,占43%。但29%的人表示,两个政党都不会在这方面做得更好。而在不太有动力去投票的选民中,51%的人把经济列为首要问题,而最有动力的选民中这一比例为36%。最被生活成本困扰的人,最不确定自己的投票能改变任何事情。
That’s what makes this election so hard to read. The economy and cost of living lead every other issue, at 43%. But 29% say neither party would do a better job on it. And among voters who aren’t highly motivated to show up, 51% call the economy their top issue, compared with 36% of the most motivated. The people most consumed by the cost of living are the least sure their vote changes anything.
在过去六个月里,我与四十多人进行了超过60小时的采访,以下是我记忆犹新的事情。那些让我进入他们家门的人——与我坐在厨房餐桌旁、在家庭晚餐上为我摆好椅子和盘子、向我敞开他们最私密的想法、场所和财务信息的人——没有一个人要求太多。
Here’s what stays with me after more than 60 hours of interviews with more than four dozen people over the course of the last six months. None of the people who let me into their homes – who sat with me at their kitchen tables, put out a chair and plate for me at their family dinners, took me to their most personal thoughts, places and financial information – asked for much.
这不是救助,也不是施舍,只是一个能托住底线的保障:房租不会翻倍,水电费合理,有机会买到父辈当年买得起的首套房,孩子们也能公平地留下来。他们自己算过账,往往比那些寄竞选传单给他们的人算得更精确。先是自责,接着愤怒,现在他们正在决定,出去投票是否值得。11月3日,真正悬而未决的,正是这些。
Not a bailout or a handout, just a floor that holds: rent that doesn’t double, a utility bill that’s right, a shot at the same starter home their parents got, a fair chance for their kids to stay. They did the math themselves, often more precisely than the people sending them mailers. Then they blamed themselves, then they got angry, and now they’re deciding whether showing up is worth it. That’s what’s really at stake on November 3.
这些旅行让我心碎的次数,比我愿意承认的还要多,但我从未变得愤世嫉俗。菲比仍然去海滩,因为那里免费。希拉第一次在市议会会议上发言。科里仍把自己的乐观称为“精神疾病”,但依然起身去收割。
I came home from these trips heartbroken more often than I’d like to admit, but never cynical. Phebie still goes to the beach because it’s free. Sheila stood up at a city council meeting for the first time in her life. Corey still calls his optimism “mental illness” and gets up for harvest anyway.
他们履行了自己的责任。几天后,他们会告诉我们,是否认为其他人也会如此。
They’re holding up their end. In a few days, they’ll tell us whether they think anyone else is.