Voters will have a say Tuesday on nearly 150 state ballot measures. The big economic items, such as California’s backfiring wealth tax, have had sustained coverage in these columns, but here’s a glance at some other proposals worth watching:

• Election laws: Six states will consider voter ID rules. Ohio already requires identification, but Issue 3 would put it in the constitution. Ditto North Carolina. Arizona’s Prop. 144 would require mail voters to “show” ID, without specifying how.

Nevada doesn’t ask for photo ID. Question 7 to change that won resoundingly in 2024, and now a second time is needed to amend the constitution. A bigger test is two blue states. California’s Prop. 39 would require identification at polling sites, plus the final digits of an ID number on mail ballots. Colorado’s Amendment 84 is a similar rule for postal votes.

Several states, from South Dakota to Arkansas, might ban voting by noncitizens. It’s illegal today for federal races, yet towns in a few states open local elections to resident aliens. Pre-emptively prohibiting this in red states is fine, but it won’t stop D.C. or the avant-garde parts of Vermont, Maryland and California.

Finally, Alaska’s Measure 2 would repeal the state’s kooky ranked-choice voting system. The public narrowly retained it in 2024, but Alaskans may have seen enough after this year’s double Dan Sullivan fiasco.

• Transgender questions: Four states have measures on girls’ sports. Washington’s Initiative 638 would “prohibit biologically male students from competing with and against female students.”Colorado’s Prop. 134 would do the same, and Prop. 135 would ban transgender surgeries on minors. Arizona and Nebraska will weigh in, too. Perhaps approval in these states might finally persuade Democrats they are out of the mainstream on gender.

• Abortion: Virginia has a permissive law allowing abortion until the third trimester, about 27 weeks. Question 1 would add a constitutional “right to reproductive freedom.”In Nevada, it’s legal until 24 weeks. Question 6 would create a constitutional right until viability. Opponents have a point that such constitutional language invites state judges to nullify, say, parental notification for minors.

In Idaho, which is restrictive on abortion, Prop. 1 would permit it until about 24 weeks. Many voters might prefer a middling option, but one isn’t on offer. This dynamic is how Missouri wound up passing an abortion constitutional right, 52% to 48%, in 2024. Amendment 3 now proposes to repeal that, while adding an explicit exception to allow abortion after rape or incest.

• Gerrymandering: Maryland’s Question 3 would free the state to draw zany districts and an 8-0 map, squeezing out GOP Rep. Andy Harris. Missouri’s Prop. A would ratify the GOP’s new 7-1 map. Colorado’s Amendment 86 would bar mid-decade partisan gerrymanders. • DEI: Arizona’s Prop. 142 would stop state bodies, such as schools, from soliciting “diversity” statements.

Wisconsin’s Question 3 would bar the state from “granting preferential treatment” by race, ethnicity or sex. These would make state law consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling on race discrimination. • Misc: Wisconsin’s Question 1 would stop the Governor from using a partial veto to raise taxes.

Gov. Tony Evers rewrote a law on school taxing limits through “2024-25” to read “2425,” so it would run for four centuries.

Kentucky’s Amendment 1 would end the Governor’s power to issue pardons as a lame duck, starting 60 days before an election. Colorado’s Amendment 81 would require police to notify the feds when charging a violent crime against an illegal alien or a person whose citizenship is unclear.

Arizona’s Prop. 319 would ban new traffic “photo enforcement systems.”Existing ones would need to get voter approval.

Colorado’s Amendment 82 would guarantee a “right to purchase natural gas for cooking or heating.”This shouldn’t be needed, but it’s protection against climate policy coercion that is all too likely. Fire up the barbecue! [video] WSJ Opinion: So, Who’s Going to Win the Midterms?