字号·· | 护眼
福克斯新闻网

梅赫克·库克:共和党未能通过“可负担性”考验,如何才能赢回选民MEHEK COOKE: Republicans failed the affordability test. This is how to win voters back

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

共和党周二失利,是因为我们忘记了政治最古老的一课:笨蛋,问题在于经济。美国人并没有突然拥抱社会主义或更大的政府。相反,他们拿杂货、汽油、住房和医疗保健这份“钱包账单”给共和党打分,随后因共和党未能兑现他们切身可感的经济减负而惩罚了共和党。

Republicans lost Tuesday because we forgot the oldest lesson in politics: It is the economy, stupid. Americans did not suddenly embrace socialism or bigger government. Instead, they graded the GOP on a pocketbook scorecard of groceries, gasoline, housing and health care, then punished Republicans for failing to deliver financial relief they could feel.

民主党夺取了国会两院控制权,翻转了多个州长职位,并在全国范围内赢得了州级选举,包括在俄亥俄州获胜——两年前特朗普总统曾以两位数优势拿下该州。共和党必须认识到,这次选举是一份绩效考核,而非单纯源于媒体偏见、投票率低迷或国家意识形态转型。在第一张选票投出之前,警告信号已十分明确。福克斯新闻的一项民调显示,60%的选民将生活成本视为最大的经济担忧,74%对经济持,仅18%表示自家情况比两年前更好。

Democrats captured both chambers of Congress, flipped governor’s offices and won statewide races across the country, including in Ohio, which President Donald Trump carried by double digits two years ago. Republicans must recognize that this election was a performance review and not simply the product of media bias, poor turnout or an ideological transformation of the country. The warning was clear before a single vote was counted. A Fox News poll found that 60% of voters considered the cost of living their greatest economic concern, 74% rated the economy negatively and only 18% said their families were better off than two years earlier.

选举日并非对共和党所有原则的否定。选民在犯罪、边境安全和移民问题上仍更信任共和党,但这些优势未能弥合负担能力的鸿沟。

Election Day was not a repudiation of every Republican principle. Voters still trusted the GOP more on crime, border security and immigration, but those advantages did not close the affordability gap.

共和党在2024年凭借承诺经济减负赢得白宫和国会两院控制权,选民通过自己的银行账户来检验该承诺的兑现情况。抛弃保守原则只会让民主党赢得更多胜利,而将失利单纯归咎于反特朗普情绪,则会无视选民发出的经济求助信号。特朗普总统兑现了减税承诺,但共和党未能让更广泛的负担能力改善足够快地惠及家庭、让他们切身感受到。

Republicans won the White House and both chambers in 2024 by promising economic relief, and voters judged the delivery of that promise through their bank accounts. Abandoning conservative principles would deliver more victories to Democrats and dismissing the losses as nothing more than anti-Trump anger would ignore the financial plea voters made. President Trump delivered tax relief, but Republicans failed to make broader affordability gains arrive quickly enough for families to feel them.

民主党人对政府失职的回应是要求更多政府。他们指出住房和医疗账单难以负担,援引可负担性问题,继而呼吁扩大预算、推出新项目、扩充联邦权力。在现有机构依然昂贵且不可靠的情况下,共和党人不能用捍卫有限政府的抽象论调来回应。

Democrats respond to government failure by demanding more government. They point to unaffordable housing and medical bills, invoke affordability and then call for larger budgets, new programs and expanded federal authority. Republicans cannot respond with abstract defenses of limited government while existing institutions remain expensive and unreliable.

下一场共和党革命必须是一场能力革命,聚焦于降低生活成本、把美国利益放在首位。这要求政府履行其基本职责、执行法律、清除阻碍家庭和企业成功的障碍。民主党衡量政府的标准是花了多少钱,共和党必须以家庭节省了多少来衡量。

The next Republican revolution must be a competence revolution focused on lowering the cost of living and putting American interests first. That requires government to perform its essential duties, enforce the law and remove barriers preventing families and businesses from succeeding. While Democrats measure government by how much it spends, Republicans must measure it by what families save.

弥合“交付差距”最清晰的机会在于医疗保健。凯撒家庭基金会(KFF)在大选后对全国选民民调的分析显示,在医疗保健议题上,选民信任民主党多于共和党,差距达19个百分点。超过半数受访者表示特朗普政府的政策让他们自己的医疗成本变得更糟,仅10%的人说成本有所改善。医疗保健是重大的“钱包问题”,选民根据自己为医疗账单支付了多少来评判共和党。

The clearest opportunity to close the delivery gap is health care. A post-election KFF analysis of the national Voter Poll found that voters trusted Democrats over Republicans by 19 points on the issue. More than half said Trump administration policies had made their own health care costs worse, while only 10% said those costs had improved. Health care is a major pocketbook issue and voters judged Republicans by how much they are paying for their medical bills.

更多承诺无法改变这种情绪,但一项强制价格透明、揭露隐性中间商加价、增加竞争、并要求及时解释拒保理由的计划可以做到。这就是有能力的政府,因为它在不建立更庞大的联邦医疗体系的前提下,赋予患者信息和选择权。

More promises won’t change that sentiment, but a plan that enforces price transparency, exposes hidden middleman markups, increases competition and requires timely explanations of coverage denials. That is competent government because it gives patients information and choices without creating a larger federal health care system.

民主党控制国会两院,仍使特朗普总统保有否决权,即便他承诺与民主党合作。这赋予了他显著的谈判筹码,因为除非民主党在两院均获得三分之二支持,否则需要他的签名才能使立法生效。特朗普总统拒签法案的权力,使他能够否决那些让生活成本上升的立法,同时要求加入能为家庭提供可衡量减负的可负担性条款。民主党如今已被警告。他们必须向选民表明,自己究竟是真正主张可负担,还是仅仅推行更大规模的支出议程。

Democratic control of both chambers of Congress still leaves President Trump with the power of the veto pen even as he pledges to work with Democrats. This gives him significant negotiating leverage because Democrats need his signature to enact legislation unless they secure two-thirds support in both chambers. President Trump’s power to say no allows him to reject legislation that makes life more expensive while demanding affordability provisions that provide measurable relief for families. Democrats are now on notice. They must show voters whether they really stand for affordability or just a larger spending agenda.

国会共和党人面临同样的可负担性使命。每一项支出法案、监管提案和政策,都应以其是否降低医疗成本、消除建房障碍、减少政府浪费、让家庭保留更多收入为衡量标准。特朗普政府和共和党州长应发布记分卡,衡量许可审批时长、免受欺诈的纳税资金数额,以及政府项目是否兑现承诺。在向失败项目追加资金前,共和党还应要求进行审计,说明出了什么问题、现有资金去向何处,以及纳税人从任何追加支出中将获得什么回报。检验标准不在于提案是红是蓝,而在于它能否让美国人钱包里留下更多“绿钞”。

Congressional Republicans face the same affordability mandate. Every spending bill, regulatory proposal and policy should be measured by whether it lowers health care costs, removes barriers to building housing, reduces government waste and allows families to keep more of what they earn. The Trump administration and Republican governors should publish scorecards that measure permit processing times, taxpayer dollars protected from fraud and whether government programs deliver what they promised. Before spending more money on a failing program, Republicans should also require an audit explaining what went wrong, where the existing money went and what taxpayers would receive from any additional spending. The test is not whether a proposal is red or blue, but whether it leaves more green in Americans’ wallets.

民主党未能拿出除指责特朗普总统之外的连贯执政策略,且已将周二的胜利误读为对社会主义的背书、扩大政府的许可,以及用两年时间调查总统的空白支票。这一错误给了共和党一个清晰的机会,去证明保守原则能让生活更可负担。周二的结果是个警告:没有有力执行的原则,赢不回多数席位。

Democrats failed to offer a coherent governing strategy beyond blaming President Trump, and they are already mistaking Tuesday’s victory for an endorsement of socialism, permission to expand government and a blank check to spend two years investigating the president. That mistake gives Republicans a clear opportunity to prove that conservative principles can make life more affordable. Tuesday was a warning that principles without competent delivery will not earn another majority.

阅读媒体原文 ↗