字号·· | 护眼
美国全国公共广播电台

经济助推民主党获胜。他们实际能对此做些什么?The economy propelled Democrats to victory. What can they actually do about it?

点「原文对照」整页切到原文,或双击某段只看那段的原文。

民主党在中期选举中大获全胜,归根结底源于选民对高昂生活成本和汽油价格的不满。但在分裂政府的格局下——民主党究竟能做多少?文字实录玛丽·路易丝·凯利,主持人:在中期选举中取得大胜后,民主党表示,对于明年1月即将到来的授权,他们看得很清楚。

Democrats' resounding victory in the midterms can be boiled down to frustrations over the high cost of living and gas prices. But in divided government — how much can Democrats do? Transcript MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST: After big wins in midterm elections, Democrats say they are clear-eyed about their mandate come January.

哈基姆·杰弗里斯:我们将奋力确保让这个国家对每一位美国人都负担得起。

HAKEEM JEFFRIES: We're going to fight to make sure that we make this country affordable for every single American.

凯利:这是哈基姆·杰弗里斯,众议院下一任议长的有力人选。现在,民主党本周赢得了参众两院的控制权,但他们将在参议院面临共和党的阻挠,外加总统否决权的威胁。那么,他们究竟能在多大程度上兑现竞选承诺?美国全国公共电台国会记者芭芭拉·斯普恩特来为我们解答这个问题。嗨,芭芭拉。芭芭拉·斯普恩特,旁白:嗨。

KELLY: That's Hakeem Jeffries, the presumptive next speaker of the House. Now, again, Democrats won control of both houses of Congress this week, but they will face Republican roadblocks in the Senate plus the threat of presidential vetoes. So how much can they actually do to deliver on their campaign promises? NPR congressional correspondent Barbara Sprunt is here to take that question. Hey, Barbara. BARBARA SPRUNT, BYLINE: Hi.

凯利:好的,民主党赢了,赢得很大,但还不足以推翻总统的否决。选民是否有因民主党在生活成本和可负担性等方面实际能够实现的目标有限而感到失望的风险?

KELLY: OK, so Democrats won big, really big, but not big enough to override a veto from the president. Is there a risk that voters will be disappointed by what Democrats can actually achieve on, say, cost of living and affordability?

斯普恩特:确实存在这种风险。但我认为这归根结底取决于沟通。你知道,我跟一些民主党人谈过,他们说需要确保不言过其实、最后却兑现不了,必须坦诚面对自身的局限性。我就此采访了马特·贝内特。他是中间派民主党智库“第三条道路”的联合创始人。

SPRUNT: Well, there is a risk. But I think it comes down to communication. You know, I've talked to Democrats who say they need to make sure that they don't overpromise and underdeliver and that they have to be upfront about their own limitations here. I was talking to Matt Bennett about this. He's the co-founder of Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank.

马特·贝内特:民主党真正承诺的是,把权力还给我们。我们将在两年内对特朗普形成制衡,等到2028年我们夺回白宫时,才能真正改善你们的生活。但我不确定选民是否听进了完整的信息。他们可能只听到了后半部分。所以可能会有真正的失望情绪。

MATT BENNETT: What Democrats were really promising was, return us to power. We will put a check on Trump for two years and then when we get to the White House in 2028, we can actually make your lives better. And it isn't clear to me that voters heard the entire message. They might have just heard the last part. And so there could be some real disappointment.

斯普恩特:但这需要走钢丝般拿捏分寸,你知道,因为民主党想表明他们在采取行动,不是干等着两年过去。

SPRUNT: But this is a needle to thread, you know, because Democrats want to show that they're taking action, that they're not just waiting around for two years.

凯利:他们不想干等着——我明白。但他们有没有列出任何细节,说明打算如何绕过共和党的阻挠?

KELLY: That they don't want to wait around - I got it. But have they laid out any detail about how they're going to get around Republican roadblocks?

斯普伦特:民主党掌控议程,这意味着他们决定提交什么进行表决。大家可能还记得,去年曾有一项推动公开爱泼斯坦档案的努力。共和党领导层试图阻止其进入议程表决。但经过一些周旋,该议案最终还是进入了议程,共和党人几乎全票与民主党人一道投票决定公开档案。因此,民主党将处于一个可以迫使共和党人就许多备受公众支持的措施公开表态的位置。

SPRUNT: Well, Democrats control the agenda, which means they get to decide what they bring up for a vote. And people may recall, last year, there was an effort to release the Epstein files. Republican leadership tried to prevent it from getting to the floor. But after some maneuvering, it did get to the floor, and Republicans voted nearly unanimously alongside Democrats to release the files. So Democrats will be in a position to force Republicans to go on the record, often on measures that have a lot of public support.

我认为也可能存在真正两党合作的领域。你知道,这种事以前发生过。我回想起2007年,民主党赢得国会控制权后,他们通过了提高最低工资的法案,由共和党总统小布什签署生效。

And there also could be areas for real bipartisanship, I think. You know, this has happened before. I think back to 2007, after Democrats won control of Congress. They passed a minimum wage increase, and it was a Republican president, George Bush, who signed it into law.

凯利:是的。芭芭拉,让我问一个选民中似乎存在两党共识的领域——说到两党合作——那就是汽油价格太高。民主党控制的国会在这方面能做多少?

KELLY: Yeah. Barbara, let me ask about one area where - speaking of bipartisanship - there seems to be bipartisan agreement among voters. The gas prices are too high. Can a Democratic-controlled Congress do much about that?

斯普伦特:这对立法者来说是个棘手的问题,因为除了试图结束伊朗战争,他们没有直接降低燃油价格的途径。他们可以尝试几种方式来做到这一点。他们可以试图通过战争权力决议来迫使特朗普就范。历史上,两党总统在很大程度上都无视过这类决议。另一种选择是利用必须通过的立法——比如政府拨款和拨款法案——加入条款,明确禁止将资金用于战争。当然,这可能会被总统否决。

SPRUNT: This is a tough one for lawmakers because they don't have a direct path towards lowering fuel prices beyond trying to end the war in Iran. And they can try to do that in a few ways. They can try to force Trump's hand with a war powers resolution. You know, historically, presidents of both parties have largely ignored those. An alternative would be using must-pass legislation like funding for the government and appropriations bill and adding a provision to explicitly stop funds from being used in the war. That, of course, could be vetoed by the president.

凯利:对。这正是关键所在——对吧?——无论他们做什么,无论送给他什么,总统都会准备好他的否决笔。

KELLY: Right. That's the nub of this - right? - that whatever they do, whatever they send his way, the president's going to have his veto pen ready.

斯普伦特:没错。我是说,但他是个不确定因素。你知道,他说过他会否决所有法案。他也说过,他能想象自己与民主党人达成交易。所以民主党人说,尽管他发出了各种矛盾信号,但把法案送到他桌上很重要。这是纽约州民主党参议员克尔斯滕·吉利布兰德昨天在《早间新闻》节目中的发言。

SPRUNT: That's right. I mean, but he is a wild card. You know, he has said that he will veto everything. He's also said that he could see himself cutting deals with Democrats. So Democrats say, despite all of the mixed signals that he's sending, it's important to send the bills to his desk. Here's New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on Morning Edition yesterday.

克尔斯滕·吉利布兰德:如果我们有一项两党法案,旨在为失去医疗补助资格的人恢复医疗保障,或改善获取负担得起药品及其他事项的途径,我就敢他否决。我就敢他站在美国人民面前说,你们不配获得医疗保健。凯利:她的意思是,这是他们工具箱里的一个工具。

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND: If we have a bill that is bipartisan to restore health care for the people who lost their Medicaid or to improve access to affordable medicines and other things, like, I dare him to veto that. I dare him to stand in front of the American people and say, you don't deserve access to healthcare. KELLY: She's saying this is a tool in their toolbox.

斯普伦特:这是个工具,而且他们打算用。如果总统否决公众支持的立法,那就会是一个又一个新闻周期,标题都是“特朗普否决降低医疗成本法案”,诸如此类。你知道,这会把事情办不成的责任完全推到他肩上。凯利:美国国家公共广播电台的芭芭拉·斯普伦特为您报道。使用条款 权限页面 详见 以获取更多信息。

SPRUNT: This is a tool, and they plan to use it. If the president vetoes legislation that's popular with the public, it's news cycle after news cycle of Trump vetoes bill to lower healthcare costs, or what have you. You know, it places the blame for stuff not getting done squarely on his shoulders. KELLY: NPR's Barbara Sprunt. terms of use permissions pages at for further information.

美国国家公共广播电台节目的文字记录准确性和可用性可能有所不同。记录文本也可能会被修订以纠正错误或匹配音频更新。音频在首次播出或发布后可能会被编辑。美国国家公共广播电台节目的权威记录以音频记录为准。

Accuracy and availability of transcripts for NPR programming may vary. Transcript text may also be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

请注意,美国国家公共广播电台的平台和产品也包含一些由第三方制作的节目;美国国家公共广播电台无法保证该内容的文字记录,且某些记录可能是使用自动化或其他工具制作的。

Please note that NPR platforms and products also include some programming produced by third parties; NPR cannot guarantee transcripts for that content and some transcripts may be produced using automated or other tools.

阅读媒体原文 ↗